| Author |
 Topic  |
|
etyrnal
Regular Member
USA
26 Posts |
 Posted - 18 Nov 2003 : 00:59:14
|
quote:
It dissolves when you become silent, and silent, and more silent. Suddenly, there is nothing to fix, no puzzle, no problem, nothing to solve. It will disappear in deep meditation along with all other thoughts.
like having a full-on DejaVu - 24/7?
…i had DejaVu many times long ago...
then two yers ago i had a peculiarly unusual version of it...
 |
 |
|
|
loybost
Regular Member
USA
29 Posts |
Posted - 18 Nov 2003 : 22:42:01
|
Greetings etyrnal, in His Holy name, Yahshua,
You requested some information that I referred to in an earlier post. I sent the referrenced statement and Common Law Offer to the email link at the bottom of your reply. Please let me know if you recieved this information.
Thank You,
Loy |
|
|
|
etyrnal
Regular Member
USA
26 Posts |
Posted - 19 Nov 2003 : 00:28:10
|
quote:
Originally posted by loybost
Greetings etyrnal, in His Holy name, Yahshua,
You requested some information that I referred to in an earlier post. I sent the referrenced statement and Common Law Offer to the email link at the bottom of your reply. Please let me know if you recieved this information.
Thank You,
Loy
yes - thank you.
I read the Offer and I am readin the other presently.
my mind is swimming.
i find so many ideas...
for ...
against ...
who can understand it ALL? |
|
|
|
gsgkill
Regular Member
USA
30 Posts |
Posted - 19 Nov 2003 : 10:40:42
|
Using UCC Redemption right Leeds to tranquility with government. After studying this subject for sometime one can participate in the income tax scheme and not be hurt. I saw a bill of exchange for $77,000 honored by the IRS. The Guy lives in Trenton Missouri the IRS un-seized his family farm. If UCC Redemption didn't work this would not have happened. Federal Debt is settled because of HR 192. You get into trouble when you try to steal at the local level. Never write a actual closed check on a closed checking account. Submit an invoice for payment using the bill of exchange and the letter of direction which is the bill of credit. For example you deal with a Gold and Silver exchange. Ask for them to write you an invoice for x amount of gold adding in insurance and shipping. Upon payment then ship. Mean while the US treasury will be trying to figure out a way not to honor it. If they don't honor it you have done nothing wrong
if they do honor it then they must have interpreted the law as you did. There is no dishonor in that. When you deal at the local level you have to deal with people who are in the delusion of asset money.
Go for the one time use of the UCC Bill of Exchange to pay all your Debts past, present and future.
My take on the great delusion:
1933 The Great Image of the Antichrist and a face of a man> George Washinton.
Through out history evil people have sought to control the money tree. In the days of Jesus Christ the moneychangers traded silver coins to the Jews for gold coins so the Jews could tithe . The silver coin, was with out a pagan emperors face. The Priests of the temple were corrupt and allowed moneychangers within the temple walls. Jesus threw out the moneychangers and called them a den of Thieves. The Priests sought to kill Jesus. Strong Exhaustive Concordance is a dictionary with the original Hebrew and Greek words from the King James Bible. Each word in the Bible if it was in the original translation of the scriptures has a corresponding number with each word. By looking up the number in Strong's you can find the definition of each word. The King James is old English. Many words in old English doesn't mean the same today. Like the word before means against in most cases. Today Daniel chapter seven verse eight has meaning. Dan 7:8 I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots: and, behold, in this horn eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things. (1)Bank of North America 1779-1785, (2) First Bank of the United States 1791-1811 (3) Second Bank of the United States. 1816-1837. These were the first 3 attempts on the same continent to control the world through the system of money. This can be found in history. The little horn is Strong's word 7162 which links to 7161 which means a peak of a mountain or a corner of an alter and sunrays. A triangle with sun rays Word 5869 the English translators said eyes instead of eye thinking the animal horn belonged to an animal and it must have had eyes. But today that shape has meaning and the plural word eyes is actually singular eye. So in this shape with the sun rays there was one eye of a man. The key word is in it. This scripture Dan 7 verse 8 is uncovered proving we are in the last generation. Also proving we are under the rule of the little horn today in 2003. The triangle with the sunrays and the eye in it, is on the one dollar bill. What is worse the number of the Antichrist the 666 is not a 666 at all. It is 600 60 and 6 it says count the number not add it. The word numbers in Strong's are 1812=600, 1835=60, 1803=6. Six hundred threescore and six. Rev 13:16 And he causeth 4160 all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: Rev 13:17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. number 706 of his 848 name.3686 His word 848 means self, your own, their own. A number for you and a number for me. The he causeth all, the (he) is not really there. It was added to give understanding. And or (it) causeth all to receive a mark. This means (it) causeth all to have their name associated with a number. It is Financial System since we can't buy or sell. Rev 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man;444 and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. (600 60 6) Man Greek word 444 From G435 and (the countenance; from G3700); ((manfaced,)) that is, a human being: - certain, man. Man means manfaced an old english way of saying a face of a man. On the great Seal on the one dollar bill in Latin it says Announcing the Conception of the New Secular order. Secular means without God. In groups of three as pointed out by Bible scripture 600 60 and 6. 600=MDC ,060=CCL , 006=XVI. 3 Greek words into 9 roman numerals = 3 Greek or English words. Download a Roman Number converter from the internet. This means the US one-dollar bill is the marker of the system. It displays a certain mans face and the 600 60 and 6 with the little horn symbol. The image of the beast we give life to. 1933 the US went bankrupt the governors of each state pledged all the citizens' assets to the New Deal to cover the National debt. Gold was called in and transferred to Europe banks.
Money became a note of Debt. There is no money. So if the money the one dollar Reserve Note is the announcing of the Beast Financial System the Image of the Beast is of this systems mirror Rev 13:15 And2532 he had power1325, 846 to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image1504 of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. Here again the (he) is not there. The word 1325 and 846 and 1325 means power while 846 means self or other persons. We give power to the image of the beast. The image 1504 a likeness of the beast is the resemblance of money. The image is it is not money. It is only likeness of money It is an illusion. The word 4151 (life) means mental disposition. You think it is money there for it is money. You give the image of the beast power and you make it live while in fact it is only the image of wealth not wealth but slavery. And word 4352 worship. To adore, to lick the hand that feeds you, to crouch down. As a slave don't you lick the hand which feeds you? There are four groups of people. Group one has their head in the sand. Group two is people who think the Government is doing it wrong and they are the only ones that are right. Group three is the people whom know they are at fault that the Government is right and they learn to move to group four. Group 4 knows that God set up a strong delusion that God controls the Government. Even if the Government doesn't know God controls them. God laid down the laws and if we fail to give God Honor and follow his law then like the Jews we become debtors to the law and we are in dishonor. Jesus came here to set us free. As free people we were to be the creditors and to operate Gods law in honor, free from slavery and from the second death. As living people by operating under Gods law we were to be free People and have a free nation. Because we did not operate under the law set forth by God our enemies have occupied us. There is no Constitution it is gone. Because of Americas Bankruptcy in 1933 there is no lawful money only debtor notes. We can't hold title with out asset money. Congress hid in public law (192) and various acts, laws, which would enable us to operate as free living souls not debtor slaves. Without remedies in law there is no law. What was taken was given back. It was hidden as remedies to the loss of the constitution and lawful money. Group 4 has moved into this area. Group 4 has found the laws and operates without the image of the beast without the fiction money. (UCC Redemption) So lets recap this the he is an it the marker of the beast system is the little Horn on the fiction currency the 600, 60, and 6. The currency displays a certain mans face And the people chose to live in the world of fiction which gives the image of the beast life which is the fiction economic system of slavery. The fiction currency announces the removal of God. So there you have it. The question is, is group four the people that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed or is it group two which can't except they might be wrong that God is in control and want to war with the beast. But that is not all
Verse Rev 13:14 And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth1by1those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
Sword word 3162 Probably feminine of a presumed derivative of G3163; a knife, that is, dirk; figuratively war, judicial punishment: - So the Beast system crashed and through several miracles Acts convinced them that dwell on the earth that to use Debt money was an asset. Desen’t that just sound nuts? To think Debt money is an asset?
|
|
|
|
gsgkill
Regular Member
USA
30 Posts |
Posted - 19 Nov 2003 : 12:13:02
|
http://sandiego.indymedia.org/en/2002/06/1628.shtml
The time has come for insurrection, to purge the criminals from power, break the chains of slavery once and for all, hang the bankers, and cry Freedom from the mountain tops!
Stephen Ames: A Tortured Enemy Of The State
By: Nicole Terry
What would happen to someone who played a major role in the discovery and publication of the following facts?
1. The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It is an Agency of the IMF. (Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.)
2. The IMF is an Agency of the UN. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. Pg. 816)
3. The U.S. Has not had a Treasury since 1921. (41 Stat. Ch.214 pg. 654)
4. The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. (Presidential Documents Volume 29-No.4 pg. 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-288)
5. The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States. No more reorganizations. After
over 200 years of operating under bankruptcy its finally over. (Executive Order 12803) Do not personate one of the creditors or
share holders or you will go to Prison.18 U.S.C. 914
6. The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the United States government. Even though
the "US Government" held shares of stock in the various Agencies. (U.S. V. Strang , 254 US 491, Lewis v. US, 680 F.2d, 1239)
7. Social Security Numbers are issued by the UN through the IMF. The Application for a Social Security Number is the SS5 form. The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 not the Social Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who or what publishes them, the earlier SS5 forms state that they are Department of the Treasury forms. You can get a copy of the SS5 you filled out by sending form SSA-L996 to the SS Administration. (20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2) Read the cites above)
8. There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178)
9. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller
v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178)
10. According to the GATT you must have a Social Security number. HouseReport (103-826)
11. We have One World Government, One World Law and a One World Monetary System.
12. The UN is a One World Super Government.
13. No one on this planet has ever been free. This planet is a Slave Colony. There has always been a One World Government. It
is just that now it is much better organized and has changed its name as of 1945 to the United Nations.
14. New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Gulliani stated on C-Span that "New
York City was the capital of the World" and he was correct. (20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2)
15. Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust Fund. (Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619, Steward Co. V. Davis 301 US 548.)
16. Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF which is an Agency of the UN. (Look at it if you receive one. It
should have written on the top left United States Treasury.)
17. You own no property, slaves can't own property. Read the Deed to the property that you think is yours. You are listed as a
Tenant. (Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session)
18. The most powerful court in America is not the United States Supreme Court but, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. (42
Pa.C.S.A. 502)
19. The Revolutionary War was a fraud. See (22, 23 and 24)
20. The King of England financially backed both sides of the Revolutionary war. (Treaty at Versailles July 16, 1782, Treaty of
Peace 8 Stat 80)
21. You can not use the Constitution to defend yourself because you are not a party to it. (Padelford Fay & Co. v. The Mayor
and Alderman of The City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)
22. America is a British Colony. (THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION, NOT A LAND MASS AND IT EXISTED BEFORE THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR AND THE BRITISH TROOPS DID NOT LEAVE UNTIL 1796.) Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, The Society for Propagating the Gospel, &c. V. New Haven 8 Wheat 464, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774.)
23. Britain is owned by the Vatican. (Treaty of 1213)
24. The Pope can abolish any law in the United States. (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol.1 53-54)
25. A 1040 form is for tribute paid to Britain. (IRS Publication 6209)
26. The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery. (Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493)
27. The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of millions of people.(Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493)
28. The Popes laws are obligatory on everyone. (Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844) (Syllabus, prop 28, 29, 44)
29. We are slaves and own absolutely nothing not even what we think are our children.(Tillman v. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van
Koten v. Van Koten 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 43 & 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481)
30. Military Dictator George Washington divided the States (Estates) into Districts. (Messages and papers of the Presidents Vo1, pg 99. Websters 1828 dictionary for definition of Estate.
31." The People" does not include you and me. (Barron v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore. 32 U.S. 243)
32. The United States Government was not founded upon Christianity. (Treaty of Tripoli 8 Stat 154.)
33. It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect the Corporation and arrest code breakers. Sapp v.
Tallahasee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff v. City of Philadelphia, 477 F.Supp. 1262, Lynch v. N.C. Dept of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247.
34. Everything in the "United States" is For Sale: roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, water, prisons, airports etc. I wonder who
bought Klamath lake. Did anyone take the time to check? (Executive Order 12803)
35. We are Human capital. (Executive Order 13037)
36. The UN has financed the operations of the United States government for over 50 years and now owns every man, women and child in America. The UN also holds all of the Land in America in Fee Simple.
37. The good news is we don't have to fulfill "our" fictitious obligations. You can discharge a fictitious obligation with another's fictitious obligation.
38. The depression and World War II were a total farce. The United States and various other companies were making loans to others all over the World during the Depression. The building of Germanys infrastructure in the 1930's including the Railroads was financed by the United States. That way those who call themselves "Kings," "Prime Ministers," and "Furher."etc could sit back and play a game of chess using real people. Think of all of the Americans, Germans etc. who gave their lives thinking they were defending their Countries which didn't even exist. The millions of innocent people who died for nothing. Isn't it obvious why Switzerland is never involved in these fiascoes? That is where the "Bank of International Settlements"is located.Wars are manufactured to keep your eye off the ball. You have to have an enemy to keep the illusion of "Government" in place.
39. The "United States" did not declare Independence from Great Britian or King George. (Get the Disks for Documents and
Essay.)
40. Guess who owns the UN? (ed. note: the vatican)
The disks have many more cites including Hundreds of Documents to verify the 40 statements above and numerous other facts. The Disks also include numerous Essays written by Stephen Ames and several other people that fully explain the 40 above mentioned facts. The Disks will clear up any confusion and answer any questions that you may have. The cites listed above are only the tip of the iceberg. Also included on the Disks are several hundred legal definitions because without them it is next to impossible for the non-lawyer to understand many of the the Documents. Simple words such as "person" "citizen" "people" "or" "nation" "crime" "charge" "right" "statute" "preferred" "prefer" "constitutor" "creditor" "debtor" "debit" "discharge" "payment" 'law" "United States" etc, do not mean what most of us think because we were never taught the legal definitions of the preceeding words. The illusion is much larger than what is cited above. |
|
|
|
loybost
Regular Member
USA
29 Posts |
Posted - 23 Nov 2003 : 20:55:49
|
Greetings to All in His Holy name, Yahshua,
I have received numerous requests for information relating to a previous post that I made on page seven of this forum. Due to these increasing requests for this information, I have decided to post it in a generic form below. It is a three part knee jerk indirect response to a Notice of Federal Tax Lien that I recently received, and it is more of a leap of Faith than it is a defense. However, our Faith is our only True defense, isn’t it?
The documents below are not to be construed as legal advise of any kind; further, any use of the documents below for legal purposes is done at your own risk. I am not a lawyer, nor do I have any intentions of ever becoming one. This information is being submitted for educational purposes over.
The arguments made below are consistent with the statutory requirements for an appeal; however, they are being brought through a superior Common Law venue. This was necessary in order to have the contents heard by an alleged court. The rest is self explanatory.
I hope that you enjoy the information below. Note: This post does not reflect the original document format. I apologize.
Peace and Grace,
Loy
______________________________________________________________________
From:
John James: Doe, II
4430 23rd Avenue Place South West
Freeville, North Carolina state republic
Responding instead of and not as:
JOHN J DOE
4430 23RD PL SW
FREEVILLE, NC 21815-9791
[Social Security Number: 123-12-1234]
To:
Internal Revenue Service
Lien Unit, Room 112
320 Federal Place
Greensboro, NC 27401
On this Nineteenth Day of the Ninth Month of the Two Thousand and Third Year of Our Lord
Affidavit
I, John James: Doe, II, am a Christian man and living soul through an act of God. I am responding instead of, not as, the soulless and lifeless legal fiction referred to by the Internal Revenue Service as “JOHN J DOE” a dishonorable misnomer that the IRS continually attempts to refer to me as; I am not this legal fictitious person. Actus Doi nomini facit injuriam. De non apparentibus et non existntibus eadem est ratio. Designatio unius est exclusio alterius, et expressum facit cessare tacitum. Jesus the Christ is my Advocate and Wonderful Counselor in all matters of Law. I am exercising my Ministerial Right of Visitation to address the colorable jurisdiction of the matter at hand. This response is being made to a Notice of Federal Tax Lien sent to: “JOHN J DOE” at the address: “4430 23RD PL SW FREEVILLE, NC 21815-9791” [note that Avenue is missing, among other errors (courtesy copy enclosed)]. Praesentia corporis tollit errorem nominis, et veritas nominis tollit errorem demonstrationis. I received it, by shear chance, at: “4430 23rd Avenue Place South West, Freeville, North Carolina state republic,” which is the location of my dwelling home. Domus sua cuique est tutissimum refugium. Domus tutissimum cuique refugium atque receptaculum. I signed the receipt for this Notice of Federal Tax Lien without prejudice as to all of my God given Rights and under the duress of a perceived threat. Likewise, this response is being made without prejudice to any of my God given Rights and is done under threat, duress, and coercion. Further, this response is not to be construed as compliance with any statute.
I believe that the IRS filed this Notice of Federal Tax Lien in error for the following reasons:
1. The IRS mailed the notice of deficiency and the notice of federal tax lien to the wrong address. It is my understanding that a proper address includes the lawful name and residence of the drawee in a bill of exchange. I did not realize, at the time that I received the notice of deficiency, that the name on that notice of deficiency was incorrect in that it was spelled in all capital letters and included an initial; in addition, improper use of abbreviations and enumeration were used to identify my dwelling home; therefore, this notice of deficiency was received by mistake. Non videntur qui errant consentire. Immediately upon realizing my mistake, I informed the IRS of the improper name and address that they had apparently mistakenly used in reference to me, and I further informed them of the mistake that I had made in my alleged receipt of that alleged presentment; this resulted in the Lawful abatement of that notice of deficiency due to the colorable misnomer that they had used and the resulting conflict with the Common Law jurisdiction of my Lawful name theretofore. I informed the IRS, with particularity, of the essential changes that must be made to the notice of deficiency and any further correspondence from them to me, in order to be acceptable by me under the Law. I made this request in good faith and was prepared to settle this matter under my Lawful Christian name but no other, ad pios usus. The IRS has since received numerous requests from me to correct these fatal errors in any and all of their presentments; they have perpetually refused to do so. The IRS has willfully, without regard to prejudice of right, responded to these requests, which were made by me, in which I used my Christian and family name and the true location of my dwelling home. In doing so they have also accepted the truth that I am who I say I am; however, they continually dishonor my good name and dwelling home with misaddressed presentments as the enclosed, “Notice of Federal Tax Lien” is a testament to.
At the instant that I was saved by the shed Blood of the Lamb who is Jesus the Christ, my name, John James, was written in the Lambs book of life; my name, therefore, belongs to God the Father, the Almighty Creator. Jesus the Christ has instructed me to render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's, in the New Testament of the Holy Bible at, Mathew: 22:21, Mark: 12:17, and Luke: 20:25. I am, therefore, bound by the Laws of God not to surrender my good name, His Lawful property, for matters of alleged taxation. Jura sanguinis nullo jure civili dirimi possunt. I have been left in charge of my good name as a temporary steward of His property. Actus legis nomini faeit injuriam. I will not dishonor Him by being a poor steward. Manga negligentia culpa est, magna culpa dolus est. Magna culpa dolus est.
Any presumption that I have willingly surrendered my good name is false. I have virtually no choice but to give the false legal appearance of being a colorable legal fiction. I have even attempted to sell my labor without the use of the colorable persona portrayed by the Social Security Card; I was promptly released from the service of the people whom otherwise would have purchased my labor. After my hiring was terminated because of my Christian belief that I should not be marked with the colorable name and number on the Social Security card, I sought to take lawful action against them in order to reinstate my hire; I found that there is no legal recourse or remedy available to me against the people who had fired me. Therefore, any appearance of voluntary usage by me of the Social Security number or any other colorable persona is false. I must support my family and myself; therefore, I must present this false name and number in order to exchange my labor for sustenance of any kind. Revelation: 13:17, states: “And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.” I have the God given Right to Life and the Right to provide for my family. Thus, I deny that any privilege is granted to me through the use of this name and number. I am being forced against my will to give the appearance that I am a fictitious colorable entity; nothing could be further from the truth; I am the man and living soul that I claim to be. The IRS is continually attempting to disgrace the Law by misaddressing the presentments they have directed toward me; therefore, all of these misaddressed presentments are void ab initio. I cannot, with a good and clear conscience, accept any of these presentments as valid until the IRS properly addresses me and my dwelling home, for me to do so would be a lie in the face of God and to all concerned parties. Contr non volentem agere nulla currit praescriptio.
The U.S. Government defines the spelling and usage of a proper name officially. The United States Government Printing Office in their "Style Manual," March 1984 edition (the most recent edition published as of March 2000), provides comprehensive grammar, style and usage for all government publications, including court and legal writing. Chapter 3, "Capitalization," at § 3.2, prescribes rules for proper names: "Proper names are capitalized. [Examples given are] Rome, Brussels, John Macadam, Macadam family, Italy, Anglo-Saxon." At Chapter 17, "Courtwork, the rules of capitalization," as mentioned in Chapter 3, are further reiterated: "17.1. Courtwork differs in style from other work only as set forth in this section; otherwise the style prescribed in the preceding sections will be followed." After reading §17 in entirety, I found no other references that would change the grammatical rules and styles specified in Chapter 3 pertaining to capitalization. At § 17.9, this same official US Government manual states: "In the titles of cases the first letter of all principal words are capitalized, but not such terms as defendant and appellee." This wholly agrees with Texas Law Review's Manual on "Usage & Style." Therefore, I see no Lawful, legal, or respectable reason why the IRS would refuse to refer to me in the Lawful manner as I have humbly and repeatedly requested.
I will accept as valid any properly addressed presentments sent to me from the IRS, I will consider any other presentment void under the Laws of God, the Common Law, and the united states Constitution there under. Due to their subsequent, blatant, and intentional misaddressing of the correspondences they have directed toward me, many of the IRS’s presentments have been returned to them unopened, countless others may have never reached my dwelling home, others still were received, but not accepted, and responded to under duress as the Christian man and living soul that I am. Thus far, it appears that the IRS has been acting in bad faith with respect to their willful use of improper addressing on the face of their presentments in direct conflict with my repeated requests, the Law, and the rules of English grammar.
The legal fiction, “JOHN J DOE,” used by the IRS is filius nullius and thus is inherently dead in law. I aver that my true name is not written in a book of death; to any man having cause to believe that I am guilty of an offence worthy of a civil death, I ask that he come forward now, proclaim any such alleged offense against me, and present his evidence of my alleged crime or forever keep his peace. Extra legem positus est civiliter mortuus. If no such charge of an offense is produced to show cause that I am a Lawfully convicted criminal who is civiliter mortuus then I retain my Right to be addressed at my dwelling home only by the Christian appellation of my Christian and family name on all presentments directed toward me of a legal and/or Lawful nature, at my discretion.
2. I had paid all tax, penalty, and interest before the lien was filed. This conclusion is drawn from my overall understanding of the Law as it pertains to lawful contracts. The sources that have I have studied to form this conclusion include, but are not limited to:
· The Holy Bible
· Griffin, G. Edward. The Creature From Jekyll Island. California: American Media, 1998.
· Maxwell, Newton. The Fed: Inside the Federal Reserve, the Secret Power Center that Controls the American Economy.
· McFadden, Louis. Congressman McFadden's Report to the House of Representatives 1934 Expose of the Fed. Reprinted by permission 1978 Arizona Caucus Club. Internet source. 8 Available at: http://www.uhuh.com/worthy/mcfad.htm - McSpeechNew York: Times Books, 1983.
· Mullins, Eustace Secrets of the Federal Reserve: The London Connection. New York: Kasper and Horton., 1952.
· Traficant, James, Jr. addressing the House. United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33, page H-1303. Internet source. 9 Available at: http://www.questionsquestions.net/documents/bankrupt.html
· U.S. Constitution. Article I, Section X.
· Common Law Maxims
· Numerous court rulings as stated below
· Fed publication, Modern Money Mechanics
The following may at first appear to be off topic; however, I will show relevance for including all of the information below. As the result of intense and thorough research on my part, I have concluded that the IRS is, in net effect, a collection agency for the privately owned Federal Reserve System (the “Fed” hereinafter). Accessorius sequit naturam sui principalis. The following is the basis for my conclusion. It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June 5, 1933 - Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only.
The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the Fed’s International Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War Powers. Members of Congress are simply the official trustees whom are presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. Government. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part: "The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States.” Since the Secretary of the Treasury receives no compensation from the U.S. Government, he/she is obviously an employee of the privately owned Fed. Therefore, the “Federal Tax Lien” that was found at my dwelling home is in fact a lien proposed by the Fed, not by any Lawful branch of the government of the United States. The Fed is a private corporation, which is neither wholly nor partly owned by the American People or the U.S. Government. In 1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their "subjects," the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal Reserve System. I deny that I am inherently a 14th Amendment second-class U.S. citizen and I further deny that I have ever intentionally asked to be treated as one. In addition, I deny that anyone, other than myself, has ever had the Right to hypothecate the intrinsic value of my labor to anyone else. One cannot Lawfully bargain with that which one does not Lawfully own. As the result of this alleged hypothecation of all of the peoples’ property, present and future, due to the bankruptcy of the federal government, the Fed may allegedly create a debt-based credit currency to loan to the American people in order to allow the people a way of discharging debts, the physical form of this fiat currency is known as Federal Reserve Notes (“Notes” hereinafter). However, roughly ninety percent of this fiat currency never leaves the bankbooks. It has been openly admitted by the representatives of the Fed that no gold, silver, or any other Lawful Consideration backs these Notes; the Notes are only backed by public faith.
These Notes are not redeemable for anything; they are, in effect and in Law, worthless. The Fed can allegedly create this debt-based credit currency out of thin air with the stroke of a pen on a ledger and, when they choose, can allegedly write it out of existence with equal ease. The alleged debt based currency that was loaned to me in exchange for my labor was comprised of these debt-based credit Notes. I have, therefore, allegedly exchanged the intrinsic value of my labor for a credit debt owed to the Fed plus interest collected as an alleged income tax. I then allegedly used these debt-based credit Notes to discharge, but not pay, other supposed debts incurred by me. This allegedly leaves me with a limited liability to the national debt. Therefore, the essential elements of Life and Liberty such as my dwelling home, my automobiles, my clothes, and so on are purportedly standing as the surety for the loan of these Notes or, more appropriately, the loan of credit that I have allegedly accepted in the stead of tangible fruits for my labor; I deny that this was ever my intent. Animus moninis est anima scripti. Confirmatio est nulla, ubi donum praecedens est invalidum.
It is my belief that the Fed has intentionally overlooked my initial and unintentional deposit, which was supposedly the intrinsic value of my labor. To illustrate this fact I present the following example from the Fed publication, Modern Money Mechanics, it reflects a typical bank deposit transaction: “For every deposit entry on the asset side of the ledger, there must be a corresponding and matching liability entry. The liability is there because it is a Demand Deposit Account, which means you could withdraw it all at any time. The two ledgers, assets and Liabilities must always balance out to zero.” Therefore, I have allegedly, yet unknowingly, deposited the fruits of my labor as collateral for a loan that the Fed has secretly made to me in some sort of weird and alien exchange for my labor; thus, according to the Fed’s rules, I must have made a deposit of intrinsic value that was an equal opposite to the debt that the Fed loaned me in exchange for my labor, plus interest of course. Since my deposit of the intrinsic value of my labor allegedly stands as collateral for these Notes that they have supposedly created then I have the Right to make a complete and total withdrawal of the intrinsic value of the fruits of my labor at any time that I choose. However, I doubt that the Fed would honor such a request for withdrawal. Supposedly, the value of my labor has simply disappeared.
I submit that it is no accident on the part of the Fed that the intrinsic value of my labor mysteriously disappeared at the same time and in the same place as the alleged value of the Fed’s debt based Notes appeared. I believe that the Fed is attempting to use the value of my labor for their profit, to my detriment. The courts have consistently ruled that banks cannot lend their credit, but can only lend their money, and that all loans of credit are ultra vires. First National Bank of Tallapoose v. Monroe, 69 SE 1123; Norton Grocery Co. v. Peoples National Bank 144 SE 501; Federal Intermediate Credit Bank v. I. Herisson, 33 F 2nd 841; American Express Co, v. Citizens State Bank, 194 NW 427.
As the result of my initial unintentional deposit being intentionally misplaced and concealed by the Fed and the resulting fraudulent tax debt arising from their carelessness, I am hereby giving Notice to the Fed’s agent, the IRS, that I am making a request for the proper procedure to demand a complete and total withdrawal of my initial deposits of value to the Fed. I wish to make this withdrawal retroactive to the instant that any and all alleged loans were made to me by the Fed, that were presumably secured by my alleged deposits. As it stands now, the Fed is holding approximately four hundred eighty five thousand, six hundred twenty seven dollars worth of the intrinsic value of my labor, which I unintentionally deposited to the Fed during the years 1978 through 2002. Until I see evidence that I am allowed to withdraw all of this money on demand, I can only assume that the Fed intends to keep my money as if it were their money, which it is not. The amount on deposit far exceeds any alleged tax (interest) that they claim that I owe. Therefore, all of the alleged and un-Lawful tax (interest) was paid in full prior to the filing of the “Federal Tax Lien.”
I suspect that the Fed will not honor any demand for the above mentioned withdrawal; therefore, until my demand is honored, I claim allodial ownership and free and clear title of any and all alleged property that the IRS claims I owe to the Fed as an interest payment, purported tax, alleged fine, or supposed penalty. I hereby place a Common Law Lien on all of the property in my possession as partial payment for the intrinsic value of my labor currently on deposit with the Fed. I deny that I Lawfully owe the Fed any usury fees for their use of the intrinsic value of my labor to make their money, profit, or credit; if anyone deserves an interest payment in the instant case, it is I. I further deny that I intentionally made a deposit or gift to the Fed of the intrinsic value of my labor.
I submit that either these Notes are based on the value of a deposit of the intrinsic value of my labor, or these debt Notes were totally un-backed, valueless and counterfeit from their inception. If I am allowed to withdraw the value of my labor from the Fed then it will negate the existence of the purported backing for any alleged loan that the Fed has made to me, thus negating any interest, tax, or penalty on such a loan retroactive to the instant that such a loan was allegedly made. If I am denied such a withdrawal then obviously nothing of value ever backed the Notes and any such loan was illegal and unlawful from its inception and so is any tax, interest, or penalty on such a loan. Out of necessity, I may have used these Notes, but if I have, it was done without prejudice to my God given Rights; any such act was done strictly because there was no other reasonable medium of exchange available to me.
I do not believe that the Fed has the power to create something of value out of nothing. Further, I aver and avow that only God can create something of worth out of nothing, no international banker of any status has that true power, and the use of these Notes by me is not to be construed as acceptance for the value of my labor. I proclaim that anyone who believes he has the power or ability to create something of value out of nothing, other than God Himself, has delusions of godhood, and I can have no faith in anything that he purports to have created including, but not limited to, these debt based Notes. Jura naturae sunt immutabilia. Ultra posse non est esse, et vice versa.
This alleged Notice of Federal Tax Lien amounts to nothing more than a foreclosure on my property by the privately owned Fed through their agent the IRS. I declare that the Fed has invested absolutely nothing of Lawful Consideration in the property in my possession, which they now intend to foreclose upon. Non oritur actio, ex turpi contractu. Contractus ex turpi caus, vel contr bonos mores nullus est. Ex malificio non oritur contractus. I, on the other hand, have invested in my property the intrinsic value of my labor, my blood, my sweat, and my tears. Inutilis labor, et sine fructu, non est effectus legis. In all truth it could only have been my labor that has paid for my property as if it were the very gold or silver backed currency that the People are guaranteed by Article I, Section X, of the united States Constitution and/or Executive Order 11110. If the alleged debt Notes created by the Fed are created from nothing then these Notes are likewise redeemable for nothing, they are not redeemable for gold or silver; they are similarly not redeemable for the intrinsic value of: my labor, my dwelling home, my automobiles, my good name, or any other thing. Conversely, my labor is redeemable for all things that I choose to own, within the limits of the intrinsic value thereof.
I profess that the Fed has reaped unimaginable wealth not only from me but also from the entire united states of the People; the Fed’s profit is a mathematically indefinable exponential gain to their investment of nothing. Ex nudo pacto non oritur action. It appears that the Fed falsely assumes that they have gained the fruits of my labor in exchange for a debt, which equates to less than nothing, they are mistaken; the Fed’s Notes are not backed by my labor nor my faith; I have given my faith to God and He has promised me the fruits of my labor. 2 Timothy: 2:6, states: “The husbandman that laboureth must be first partaker of the fruits”. If I were to put my faith in the Fed’s Notes then I would effectively be worshiping the Fed as a false god by showing a false belief that the Fed can create something of value out of nothing, I have no such belief or faith in the Fed or anything that its bankers purport to create; I will not perform any such worship of those members of the Fed who falsely presume that they have such godlike powers as to create or destroy wealth with the stroke of a pen. In the Holy Bible I am told at Matthew: 6:24, and at Luke: 16:13, that “No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.” I choose to serve God. No man warring for God should be troubled with secular business.
Despite my conclusions as to the nature of this alleged debt, so as not to offend anyone, I have previously offered to Lawfully make payment in full of any and all alleged debt on my part in Lawful gold or silver money. The IRS has refused to make arrangements to accept this Lawful payment from me, as the man and living soul that I am, under the name that God left in my stewardship; they have further refused to provide me with the name, specie, or type of a preferred and Lawful money suitable for extinguishing this alleged debt. Lex non cogit impossibilia. Reprobata pecunia liberat solventum. Their refusal to make arrangements to accept Lawful payment of this alleged debt is further evidence that there is no Lawful consideration to the alleged debt in question. Reprobata pecunia liberat solventum. Any alleged debt that is not based on Lawful consideration is null and void from its inception and is thus paid in full ab initio. Contractus ex turpi caus, vel contr bonos mores nullus est.
In the case of the First National Bank of Montgomery vs. Jerome Daly, State of Minnesota in Justice Court, County of Scott Township of Credit River, the Justice, Martin V. Mahoney, made the following rulings that support my belief in his Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Judgment and Determination, and his Judgment and Decree, and his Memorandum:
Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Judgment and Determination
1. That the Federal Reserve Banking Corporation is a United States Corporation with twelve (12) banks throughout the United States, including New York, Minneapolis and San Francisco. That the First National Bank of Montgomery is also a United States Corporation, incorporated and existing under the laws of the United States and is a member of the Federal Reserve System, and more specifically, of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
2. That because of the interlocking control activities, transactions and practices, the Federal Reserve Banks and the National Banks are for all practical purposes, in the law, one and the same bank.
3. As is evidenced from the book "The Federal Reserve System: Its Purposes and functions, pages 74 to 78 and 177 and 180, put out by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D. C., 1963, and from other evidence adduced herein, the said Federal Reserve Banks and National Banks create money and credit upon their books and exercise the ultimate Prerogative of expanding and reducing the supply of money or credit in the united states. The actual pages of the Federal Reserve Manual are reproduced herein on page 38 to 46,__ See especially page 75 of the Manual. This creation of money or credit upon the books of the Banks constitutes the creation of fiat money by bookkeeping entry.
4. Ninety percent or more of the credit never leaves the books of the banks so they need produce no specie as backing
5. When the Federal Reserve Banks and National Banks acquire United States Bonds and Securities, mortgages on private real property and mortgages on private personal property, the said banks create the money and credit upon their books by bookkeeping entry. The first time that the money comes into existence is when they create it on their bankbooks by bookkeeping entry. The banks create it out of nothing. No substantial fund of gold or silver is back of it or any fund at all.
Judgment and Decree
The above entitled action came on before the Court and a Jury of 12 on December 7, 1968 at 10:00 am. Plaintiff appeared by its President Lawrence V. Morgan and was represented by its Counsel, R. Mellby. Defendant appeared on his own behalf.
A Jury of Talesmen were called, impaneled and sworn to try the issues in the Case. Lawrence V. Morgan was the only witness called for Plaintiff and Defendant testified as the only witness in his own behalf.
Plaintiff brought this as a Common Law action for the recovery of the possession of Lot 19 Fairview Beach, Scott County, Minn. Plaintiff claimed title to the Real Property in question by foreclosure of a Note and Mortgage Deed dated May 8, 1964 which Plaintiff claimed was in default at the time foreclosure proceedings were started.
Defendant appeared and answered that the Plaintiff created the money and credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry as the consideration for the Note and Mortgage of May 8, 1964 and alleged failure of the consideration for the Mortgage Deed and alleged that the Sheriff's sale passed no title to plaintiff.
The issues tried to the Jury were whether there was a lawful consideration and whether Defendant had waived his rights to complain about the consideration having paid on the Note for almost 3 years.
Mr. Morgan admitted that all of the money or credit which was used as a consideration was created upon their books, that this was standard banking practice exercised by their bank in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, another private Bank, further that he knew of no United States Statute or Law that gave the Plaintiff the authority to do this. Plaintiff further claimed that Defendant by using the ledger book created credit and by paying on the Note and Mortgage waived any right to complain about the Consideration and that the Defendant was estopped from doing so.
At 12:15 on December 7, 1968 the Jury returned a unanimous verdict for the Defendant.
Now therefore, by virtue of the authority vested in me pursuant to the Declaration of Independence, the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, the Constitution of United States and the Constitution and the laws of the State of Minnesota not inconsistent therewith;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
1.That the Plaintiff is not entitled to recover the possession of Lot 19, Fairview Beach, Scott County, Minnesota according to the Plat thereof on file in the Register of Deeds office.
2.That because of failure of a lawful consideration the Note and Mortgage dated May 8, 1964 are null and void.
3.That the Sheriff's sale of the above described premises held on June 26, 1967 is null and void, of no effect.
4.That the Plaintiff has no right title or interest in said premises or lien thereon as is above described.
5.That any provision in the Minnesota Constitution and any Minnesota Statute binding the jurisdiction of this Court is repugnant to the Constitution of the United States and to the Bill of Rights of the Minnesota Constitution and is null and void and that this Court has jurisdiction to render complete Justice in this Cause.
The following memorandum and any supplementary memorandum made and filed by this Court in support of this Judgment is hereby made a part hereof by reference.
BY THE COURT
Dated December 9, 1968
Justice MARTIN V. MAHONEY
Credit River Township
Scott County, Minnesota
MEMORANDUM
The issues in this case were simple. There was no material dispute of the facts for the Jury to resolve.
Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of their interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire $14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Ansheuser-Busch Brewing Company v. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318, 46 N.W. 558. The Jury found that there was no consideration and I agree. Only God can create something of value out of nothing.
Even if Defendant could be charged with waiver or estoppel as a matter of Law this is no defense to the Plaintiff. The Law leaves wrongdoers where it finds them. See sections 50, 51 and 52 of Am Jur 2nd "Actions" on page 584 – "no action will lie to recover on a claim based upon, or in any manner depending upon, a fraudulent, illegal, or immoral transaction or contract to which Plaintiff was a party."
Plaintiff's act of creating credit is not authorized by the Constitution and Laws of the United States, is unconstitutional and void, and is not a lawful consideration in the eyes of the Law to support any thing or upon which any lawful right can be built.
Nothing in the Constitution of the United States limits the jurisdiction of this Court, which is one of original Jurisdiction with right of trial by Jury guaranteed. This is a Common Law action. Minnesota cannot limit or impair the power of this Court to render Complete Justice between the parties. Any provisions in the Constitution and laws of Minnesota which attempt to do so is repugnant to the Constitution of the United States and void. No question as to the Jurisdiction of this Court was raised by either party at the trial. Both parties were given complete liberty to submit any and all facts to the Jury, at least in so far as they saw fit.
No complaint was made by Plaintiff that Plaintiff did not receive a fair trial. From the admissions made by Mr. Morgan the path of duty was direct and clear for the Jury. Their Verdict could not reasonably have been otherwise. Justice was rendered completely and without denial, promptly and without delay, freely and without purchase, conformable to the laws in this Court of December 7, 1968.
BY THE COURT
December 9, 1968
Justice Martin V. Mahoney
Credit River Township
Credit River Township
Note: It has never been doubted that a Note given on a Consideration which is prohibited by law is void. It has been determined, independent of Acts of Congress, that sailing under the license of an enemy is illegal. The emission of Bills of Credit upon the books of these private Corporations for the purpose of private gain is not warranted by the Constitution of the United States and is unlawful. See Craig v. Mo. 4 Peters Reports 912. This Court can tread only that path which is marked out by duty. M.V.M.
JEROME DALY'S OWN ENTRY
REGARDING JUSTICE MAHONEY'S MEMORANDUM
FORWARD: The above Judgment was entered by the Court on December 9, 1968. The issue there was simple - Nothing in the law gave the Banks the right to create money on their books. The Bank filed a Notice of Appeal within 10 days. The Appeals statutes must be strictly followed, otherwise the District Court does not acquire Jurisdiction upon Appeal. To effect the Appeal the Bank had to deposit $2.00 with the Clerk within 10 days for payment to the Justice when he made his return to the District Court. The Bank deposited two $1.00 Federal Reserve Notes. The Justice refused the Notes and refused to allow the Appeal upon the grounds that the Notes were unlawful and void for any purpose. The Decision is addressed to the legality of these Notes and the Federal Reserve System. The Cases of Edwards v. Kearnzey and Craig vs Missouri set out in the decision should be studied very carefully as they bear on the inviolability of Contracts. This is the Crux of the whole issue. Jerome Daly.
It is my firm belief that the primary difference between the instant case and the Lawful conclusions set forth in the above cited case is that Jerome Daly was informed of the existence of a contract of the loan prior to entering into the above mentioned unlawful contract, whereas I have never been officially informed in clear and unequivocal language that I was engaged in the contract of a loan at all. Therefore, the same conclusions of fact and Law apply in the instant case as well as the one cited above. The unavoidable conclusion can only be that the Fed has collected all that is due from me, and more; the IRS is mistaken in all of their conclusions to the contrary. If any man has cause to believe that the bankers of the Fed have invested any Lawful consideration in my property, or that I have no Right to the fruits of my labor, or that I have not compensated the Fed in kind for one hundred percent or more of the intrinsic value, if any, of the loan(s) that I have allegedly received, or that anyone but God can create something of value out of nothing then let him speak now and present the evidence of his contention or may he forever keep his peace. At Matthew: 23:16, Jesus said: “Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor!”
Summation of Truth:
· I am, John James: Doe, II, a Christian man and living soul.
· I am not, JOHN J DOE, a fictitious colorable character under the jurisdiction of a colorable court of Admiralty jurisdiction.
· To claim that I have willfully volunteered to be a second class Fourteenth Amendment US citizen is as absurd as saying that a man being robbed at gunpoint under threat of loss of life made a gift of his money to his assailant.
· Federal Reserve Notes are nothing more than unsigned checks written on a closed account. Only the BTUs of heat these Notes would release if they were burned could measure their intrinsic value.
· Only God can create something of value out of nothing.
· The debt that has been forced upon me in exchange for my labor is the opposite of any purported income that is allegedly being taxed.
· Currency that has no Lawful consideration as backing can be neither Lawful money, nor Lawful income.
· If the Fed will not allow me withdraw the intrinsic value of my labor from the account in which it was placed then I can only assume that the Fed has stolen the value of my labor from me and deserves nothing else as payment for any alleged debt.
· The Fed has already received more compensation than they are due for any debt they allege is due to them.
· The IRS refuses to properly address me in this matter.
Proposed Solution:
My Advocate and Wonderful Counselor, Jesus the Christ, has advised me to offer Lawful payment of this alleged tax debt regardless of the validity of the allegation of this alleged debt. He has further advised me of the manner in which this offer must be presented. He has made it very clear to me, by His example, the actions that I must take at this point to make this offer acceptable to God the Father.
Jesus was angry when Peter told the tax collectors in Capernaum that his Master, Jesus, paid tribute to Caesar. However, so as not to offend the tax collectors, He instructed Peter the proper procedure for payment of the tax at Matthew: 17:27: “Notwithstanding, lest we should offend them, go thou to the sea, and cast an hook, and take up the fish that first cometh up; and when thou hast opened his mouth, thou shalt find a piece of money: that take, and give unto them for me and thee.” I understand that a fish is a creature bound by the laws of the sea; it must rely on the sea for its very survival. The fish in the instant case is the colorable fictitious entity referred to by the IRS as “JOHN J DOE”. The sea is the Admiralty law jurisdiction, the law of the sea, which this colorable entity owes its alleged existence to. I must, therefore, not speak as this colorable entity; I must speak as the Lawful Christian man and living soul that I am, with the Lawful name that God has left in my care. Further, I cannot offer payment in Federal Reserve Notes; I have no faith in these Federal Reserve Notes so they have no backing if I use them. I cannot pay a debt with another debt; it is simply impossible to do so. A l'impossible nul n'est tenu. I must offer Lawful money in gold and/or silver if I am to pay this alleged debt. Since payment of this alleged tax debt must be with Lawful money, payment is being offered under the Common Law jurisdiction. The Federal Reserve System is a legal fiction and legal person. The IRS is also a legal fiction and a legal person. Neither the Fed nor their agent, the IRS, exist under the Common Law; therefore, I must ask that a natural person accept the consequence of the Common Law and voluntarily enter in to a contract with me in order to accept this Lawful payment for the good of their master; I will offer this Lawful payment under the Common Law for the good of my Master; thus, these acts will be equal under the Law. Aequum et bonum, est lex legum.
The IRS has repeatedly refused to offer a contract that will allow Lawful payment for this alleged debt in gold or silver. The IRS has similarly refused to address me by my Lawful name. Culpa lata aequiparatur dolo. Therefore, I have devised the Common Law Contract for payment of this alleged debt as a willing servant of my Master, God the Father and I accept full Lawful responsibility for that payment. In turn the Fed/IRS may choose a natural person who is willing to be a servant of their master and accept the payment of the alleged debt and full Lawful responsibility for the Lawfulness of the allegation of that debt. My Common Law Offer of Payment is enclosed. If my offer is accepted in the prescribed manner then I will sell virtually everything that I own in order to acquire the Lawful money to pay this alleged debt. Further, I retain my Right to take Common Law action against the natural person accepting the enclosed Contract if it is determined that the allegation of this debt was unfounded in Law. I will render unto Caesar only that which is Caesar’s; I will render unto God that which is God’s.
If this Common Law Contract is not accepted within thirty days of its receipt, I will file a Common Law Notice of Default of Acceptance. I will surmise that no debt ever existed in fact or in Law and consider any further claim of tax debt null and void.
Respond only to:
“John James: Doe, II 4430 23rd Avenue Place South West Freeville, North Carolina state republic”
I, John James: Doe, II, aver and avow that all of the above is true to the best of my knowledge and good faith belief: Yea. Pursuant to the Holy Bible at James: 5:12.
Signed:_________________________, a Lawful man and living soul
Sealed:__________________________
Delivered on this_________ Day of the __________ Month of the ___________________Year of Our Lord, Jesus the Christ.
______________________________________________________________________
Common Law Contract for the Payment and Receipt of Any and All Federal Income Tax Debt Lawfully Owed By: John James: Doe, II
Debtor: John James: Doe, II
I, John James: Doe, II, a man and living soul, do hereby offer Lawful payment, under the Common Law, with the gold and/or silver Lawful United States coined currency specified below by the recipient named below for the alleged Federal Income Tax debt that the recipient alleges that I Lawfully owe.
Debtor’s Lawful Christian and family name and address of his dwelling home:
John James: Doe, II
4403 23rd Avenue Place South East
Freeville, North Carolina
Recipient:______________________:___________(complete proper spelling only, no initials)
I, _____________________:________________, a natural person, using my true and complete Lawful name in the instant case, do hereby swear under the penalty of perjury and under the punishment of the Common Law that:
1. I have personally determined that the debtor named above Lawfully owes the Federal Income Tax in the amount stated below.
2. Upon my receipt of Lawful payment of this debt no future action will be taken to collect said Federal Income Tax debt from the debtor.
3. The debtor named above owes _____________________________ dollars in Lawful money and must pay said amount to me in order to completely extinguish the Federal Income Tax debt, which I have determined that he Lawfully owes under the Common Law.
4. I am authorized by, ____________________________, to receive this debt from the debtor on, ___________________________, behalf.
5. I understand that I will be held personally liable under the Common Law for any damages to the debtor as the result any wrongful determination on my part of his Federal Income Tax debt.
6. The debtor must Lawfully pay this Federal Income Tax debt with (number and date of Lawful United States coined currency) __________________, __________________ twenty dollar gold pieces of Lawful United States coined currency and (number and date of Lawful United States coined currency) _____________, _____________ silver dollars of Lawful United States coined currency.
7. No Federal Reserve Notes or clad coinage is to be offered or accepted as payment for this or any alleged debt under the Common Law.
8. Failure to enter into this Common Law Contract or to make a counter Common Law offer of Contract within Thirty Days of the receipt of this Contract negates all present and future claims of a Federal Income Tax debt allegedly owed by the debtor.
Recipient’s complete Lawful Christian and family name and address of his/her dwelling home:
Name:
Address of dwelling home:
Debtor:
I, John James: Doe, II, a man and living soul, the alleged debtor in the instant case, aver and avow that upon completion and acceptance, by the recipient, of the Common Law Contract above that I will sign and accept this Common Law Contract and make immediate arrangements to pay the above stated amount in Lawful money to the recipient for the alleged Federal Income Tax debt that the recipient swears under penalty of perjury that I owe. I reserve my Right to seek restitution against the recipient under the Common Law for any damages that I may incur due to any un-Lawful determination by the recipient of this alleged Federal Income Tax debt.
The above statements are true to the best of my knowledge and good faith belief: yea. Pursuant to the Holy Bible at James: 5:12.
Signed, ____________________________, a man and living soul
On this _______________ Day of the __________________ Month of the ____________________ Year of our Lord
Recipient:
I, ___________________:____________, a natural person, the recipient in the instant case, aver and avow that upon completion and acceptance of the Common Law Contract above by myself and by the debtor that I will accept the Lawful money offered by the debtor, in the amount I have indicated above, as complete and total payment of any and all Federal Income Tax that I have personally determined that the debtor owes. I have been authorized by, _______________________, to accept payment for this debt under the Common Law. I personally accept all responsibility for any and all damages to the debtor that result from any false determination on my part as to the validity of the debt that I allege he owes.
I swear under penalty of perjury that all of the above is true to the best of my knowledge and good faith belief.
Signed, _____________________________, a natural person
On this _______________ Day of the __________________ Month of the ____________________ Year of our Lord
______________________________________________________________________
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
John James: Doe, II
AND WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO
THE FOLLOWING MAIL
LOCATION:
John James: Doe, II
4430 23rd Avenue Place South West
Freeville, North Carolina state republic
(SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE)
______________________________________________________________________
Signed and Sealed:
Common Law Notice of Default of Acceptance in Affidavit Form
On this Twenty Fifth Day of the Eleventh Month of the Two Thousand and Third Year of our Lord, Jesus the Christ
Registered Mail #_____________________
To Respondent:
Attention: Ray F. Howard, District Director
Internal Revenue Service
320 Federal Place
Greensboro, NC 27401
1. I, John James: Doe, II, a Christian man and a living soul, the undersigned Affiant ("Affiant"), now exercise my Ministerial Right of Visitation and hereby give notice to Ray F. Howard, District Director, Internal Revenue Service, the above named "Respondent," of this Common Law Notice of Default of Acceptance in Affidavit Form, hereinafter called "Notice of Default," and declare and testify:
That Affiant is a Christian man and a living soul, and is competent to testify, and further;
That Affiant has first hand knowledge of the facts related herein, and further;
That the facts related herein are true, correct and complete to the best of the knowledge and belief of the Affiant, and further;
That the law and conclusions of law related herein are true to the best of the knowledge and belief of the Affiant.
2. I, John James: Doe, II, declare and testify:
Respondent is hereby noticed that Respondent is in default of an opportunity to respond, within a reasonable time, to the “Common Law Contract for the Payment and Receipt of Any and All Federal Income Tax Debt Lawfully Owed By: John James: Doe, II” and the attached Affidavit made by John James: Doe, II, Affiant, dated the Nineteenth Day of the Ninth Month of the Two Thousand and Third Year of Our Lord and delivered to Respondent, individually and as agent for Respondent's principal, the Internal Revenue Service, by the United States Postal Service, Registered Mail number _RB 366 126 726 US_.
3. I, John James: Doe, II, Affiant, declare and testify:
Respondent was given the opportunity to rebut the facts, statements, claims, laws and conclusions of law made in the Affidavit by delivering and recording a controverting affidavit; and by Respondent's failure to answer with said Controverting Affidavit, Respondent is therefore in default of said Affidavit. Further, the Respondent has refused to accept an offer of Lawful payment for any and all Federal Tax that the Affiant was accused of owing by the Respondent. Due to this refusal of Lawful payment, the respondent has forfeited all right of claim for receipt of payment of any and all Federal Income Tax by the Affiant; any presumed debt of the Affiant by the Respondent is thusly null and void ab initio.
4. I, John James: Doe, II, Affiant, declare and testify:
The said default shall be hereafter effective against Respondent since Respondent has refused Lawful payment of the alleged income tax debt from the Affiant and has waived the right to answer within a reasonable time with said Controverting Affidavit and, by acquiescence, tacit admission and failure to contest under the doctrine of "Estoppel by Acquiescence," Respondent has forfeited Respondent's due process opportunity to contest the truth of the facts, statements, claims, laws and conclusions of law made in said Affidavit and has consequently affirmed said facts, statements, claims, laws and conclusions of law.
5. I, John James: Doe, II, Affiant, declare and testify:
In absence of Respondent's response according to the foregoing, the undersigned Affiant, John James: Doe, II, hereby presents same by necessity under duress of force, hereby inserts and records this Notice of Default upon and against above named Respondent, Ray F. Howard, District Director, Internal Revenue Service; individually and as agent for the Internal Revenue Service.
6. I, John James: Doe, II, Affiant, declare and testify:
Now, therefore, the undersigned Affiant shall rely upon said acquiescence, tacit admission and failure of Respondent to accept Lawful payment and failure to contest any and all actions by the undersigned Affiant shall now be taken in accordance to the uncontested facts, statements, claims, laws and conclusions of Law set forth in the said Affidavit defaulted. This Notice of Default is not being made and presented to Respondent voluntarily, but is being submitted by Affiant involuntarily and by necessity, under coercion and duress, as further set forth in said Affidavit, and this act is not to be construed as compliance with any statute or treasury regulation.
7. I, John James: Doe, II, Affiant, declare and testify:
Notwithstanding any statement, reference or information set forth in this Notice, I, John James: Doe, II, Affiant, have no intention of hereby offering or ratifying any contract and hereby make no further offer or ratification of any contract, expressed or implied. With respect to this Notice, it is a Common Law Maxim that: "Notice to the agent is notice to the principal; notice to the principal is notice to the agent."
8. I, John James: Doe, II, Affiant, declare and testify:
Any response to this Notice of Default must be sent to John James: Doe, II at the above mailing location as set forth on page 15 of said Affidavit Statement within 10 days of receipt hereof.
The undersigned Affiant, John James: Doe, II, has personal knowledge of the above facts, is a Christian man and a living soul, competent to testify to the above facts, and I aver and avow that all of the above is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge and good faith belief: Yea. Pursuant to the Holy Bible at James: 5:12.
Enclosures include Courtesy Copies of : “Affidavit”, “Common Law Contract for the Payment and Receipt of Any and All Federal Income Tax Debt Lawfully Owed By: John James: Doe, II” and Receipt for registered mail number – RB 366 126 716 US, accepted on September 22nd, 2003.
Signed, Sealed, and Delivered on this Twenty Fifth Day of the Eleventh Month of the Two Thousand and Third Year of Our Lord.
__________________________________, Sealed: ____________
John James: Doe, II, Affiant, through the Ministerial Right of Visitation |
|
|
|
loybost
Regular Member
USA
29 Posts |
Posted - 23 Nov 2003 : 21:05:54
|
Common Law Contract for the Payment and Receipt of Any and All Federal Income Tax Debt Lawfully Owed By: John James: Doe, II
Debtor: John James: Doe, II
I, John James: Doe, II, a man and living soul, do hereby offer Lawful payment, under the Common Law, with the gold and/or silver Lawful United States coined currency specified below by the recipient named below for the alleged Federal Income Tax debt that the recipient alleges that I Lawfully owe.
Debtor’s Lawful Christian and family name and address of his dwelling home:
John James: Doe, II
4403 23rd Avenue Place South East
Freeville, North Carolina
Recipient:______________________:___________(complete proper spelling only, no initials)
I, _____________________:________________, a natural person, using my true and complete Lawful name in the instant case, do hereby swear under the penalty of perjury and under the punishment of the Common Law that:
1. I have personally determined that the debtor named above Lawfully owes the Federal Income Tax in the amount stated below.
2. Upon my receipt of Lawful payment of this debt no future action will be taken to collect said Federal Income Tax debt from the debtor.
3. The debtor named above owes _____________________________ dollars in Lawful money and must pay said amount to me in order to completely extinguish the Federal Income Tax debt, which I have determined that he Lawfully owes under the Common Law.
4. I am authorized by, ____________________________, to receive this debt from the debtor on, ___________________________, behalf.
5. I understand that I will be held personally liable under the Common Law for any damages to the debtor as the result any wrongful determination on my part of his Federal Income Tax debt.
6. The debtor must Lawfully pay this Federal Income Tax debt with (number and date of Lawful United States coined currency) __________________, __________________ twenty dollar gold pieces of Lawful United States coined currency and (number and date of Lawful United States coined currency) _____________, _____________ silver dollars of Lawful United States coined currency.
7. No Federal Reserve Notes or clad coinage is to be offered or accepted as payment for this or any alleged debt under the Common Law.
8. Failure to enter into this Common Law Contract or to make a counter Common Law offer of Contract within Thirty Days of the receipt of this Contract negates all present and future claims of a Federal Income Tax debt allegedly owed by the debtor.
Recipient’s complete Lawful Christian and family name and address of his/her dwelling home:
Name:
Address of dwelling home:
Debtor:
I, John James: Doe, II, a man and living soul, the alleged debtor in the instant case, aver and avow that upon completion and acceptance, by the recipient, of the Common Law Contract above that I will sign and accept this Common Law Contract and make immediate arrangements to pay the above stated amount in Lawful money to the recipient for the alleged Federal Income Tax debt that the recipient swears under penalty of perjury that I owe. I reserve my Right to seek restitution against the recipient under the Common Law for any damages that I may incur due to any un-Lawful determination by the recipient of this alleged Federal Income Tax debt.
The above statements are true to the best of my knowledge and good faith belief: yea. Pursuant to the Holy Bible at James: 5:12.
Signed, ____________________________, a man and living soul
On this _______________ Day of the __________________ Month of the ____________________ Year of our Lord
Recipient:
I, ___________________:____________, a natural person, the recipient in the instant case, aver and avow that upon completion and acceptance of the Common Law Contract above by myself and by the debtor that I will accept the Lawful money offered by the debtor, in the amount I have indicated above, as complete and total payment of any and all Federal Income Tax that I have personally determined that the debtor owes. I have been authorized by, _______________________, to accept payment for this debt under the Common Law. I personally accept all responsibility for any and all damages to the debtor that result from any false determination on my part as to the validity of the debt that I allege he owes.
I swear under penalty of perjury that all of the above is true to the best of my knowledge and good faith belief.
Signed, _____________________________, a natural person
On this _______________ Day of the __________________ Month of the ____________________ Year of our Lord
______________________________________________________________________
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
John James: Doe, II
AND WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO
THE FOLLOWING MAIL
LOCATION:
John James: Doe, II
4430 23rd Avenue Place South West
Freeville, North Carolina state republic
(SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE)
Signed and Sealed:
Common Law Notice of Default of Acceptance in Affidavit Form
On this Twenty Fifth Day of the Eleventh Month of the Two Thousand and Third Year of our Lord, Jesus the Christ
Registered Mail #_____________________
To Respondent:
Attention: Ray F. Howard, District Director
Internal Revenue Service
320 Federal Place
Greensboro, NC 27401
1. I, John James: Doe, II, a Christian man and a living soul, the undersigned Affiant ("Affiant"), now exercise my Ministerial Right of Visitation and hereby give notice to Ray F. Howard, District Director, Internal Revenue Service, the above named "Respondent," of this Common Law Notice of Default of Acceptance in Affidavit Form, hereinafter called "Notice of Default," and declare and testify:
That Affiant is a Christian man and a living soul, and is competent to testify, and further;
That Affiant has first hand knowledge of the facts related herein, and further;
That the facts related herein are true, correct and complete to the best of the knowledge and belief of the Affiant, and further;
That the law and conclusions of law related herein are true to the best of the knowledge and belief of the Affiant.
2. I, John James: Doe, II, declare and testify:
Respondent is hereby noticed that Respondent is in default of an opportunity to respond, within a reasonable time, to the “Common Law Contract for the Payment and Receipt of Any and All Federal Income Tax Debt Lawfully Owed By: John James: Doe, II” and the attached Affidavit made by John James: Doe, II, Affiant, dated the Nineteenth Day of the Ninth Month of the Two Thousand and Third Year of Our Lord and delivered to Respondent, individually and as agent for Respondent's principal, the Internal Revenue Service, by the United States Postal Service, Registered Mail number _RB 366 126 726 US_.
3. I, John James: Doe, II, Affiant, declare and testify:
Respondent was given the opportunity to rebut the facts, statements, claims, laws and conclusions of law made in the Affidavit by delivering and recording a controverting affidavit; and by Respondent's failure to answer with said Controverting Affidavit, Respondent is therefore in default of said Affidavit. Further, the Respondent has refused to accept an offer of Lawful payment for any and all Federal Tax that the Affiant was accused of owing by the Respondent. Due to this refusal of Lawful payment, the respondent has forfeited all right of claim for receipt of payment of any and all Federal Income Tax by the Affiant; any presumed debt of the Affiant by the Respondent is thusly null and void ab initio.
4. I, John James: Doe, II, Affiant, declare and testify:
The said default shall be hereafter effective against Respondent since Respondent has refused Lawful payment of the alleged income tax debt from the Affiant and has waived the right to answer within a reasonable time with said Controverting Affidavit and, by acquiescence, tacit admission and failure to contest under the doctrine of "Estoppel by Acquiescence," Respondent has forfeited Respondent's due process opportunity to contest the truth of the facts, statements, claims, laws and conclusions of law made in said Affidavit and has consequently affirmed said facts, statements, claims, laws and conclusions of law.
5. I, John James: Doe, II, Affiant, declare and testify:
In absence of Respondent's response according to the foregoing, the undersigned Affiant, John James: Doe, II, hereby presents same by necessity under duress of force, hereby inserts and records this Notice of Default upon and against above named Respondent, Ray F. Howard, District Director, Internal Revenue Service; individually and as agent for the Internal Revenue Service.
6. I, John James: Doe, II, Affiant, declare and testify:
Now, therefore, the undersigned Affiant shall rely upon said acquiescence, tacit admission and failure of Respondent to accept Lawful payment and failure to contest any and all actions by the undersigned Affiant shall now be taken in accordance to the uncontested facts, statements, claims, laws and conclusions of Law set forth in the said Affidavit defaulted. This Notice of Default is not being made and presented to Respondent voluntarily, but is being submitted by Affiant involuntarily and by necessity, under coercion and duress, as further set forth in said Affidavit, and this act is not to be construed as compliance with any statute or treasury regulation.
7. I, John James: Doe, II, Affiant, declare and testify:
Notwithstanding any statement, reference or information set forth in this Notice, I, John James: Doe, II, Affiant, have no intention of hereby offering or ratifying any contract and hereby make no further offer or ratification of any contract, expressed or implied. With respect to this Notice, it is a Common Law Maxim that: "Notice to the agent is notice to the principal; notice to the principal is notice to the agent."
8. I, John James: Doe, II, Affiant, declare and testify:
Any response to this Notice of Default must be sent to John James: Doe, II at the above mailing location as set forth on page 15 of said Affidavit Statement within 10 days of receipt hereof.
The undersigned Affiant, John James: Doe, II, has personal knowledge of the above facts, is a Christian man and a living soul, competent to testify to the above facts, and I aver and avow that all of the above is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge and good faith belief: Yea. Pursuant to the Holy Bible at James: 5:12.
Enclosures include Courtesy Copies of : “Affidavit”, “Common Law Contract for the Payment and Receipt of Any and All Federal Income Tax Debt Lawfully Owed By: John James: Doe, II” and Receipt for registered mail number – RB 366 126 716 US, accepted on September 22nd, 2003.
Signed, Sealed, and Delivered on this Twenty Fifth Day of the Eleventh Month of the Two Thousand and Third Year of Our Lord.
__________________________________, Sealed: ____________
John James: Doe, II, Affiant, through the Ministerial Right of Visitation
|
|
|
|
gsgkill
Regular Member
USA
30 Posts |
Posted - 29 Nov 2003 : 13:18:26
|
property rights and tax liens
We always seem make the obvious sheep like moves. Like good robots we buy a pieces of property and run right down and register it with the county register of deeds office, why?
So they can become part owners of our property? so we can say look I own this property? now you can bond it I'll pay rent we will call it tax! Oh yes and make me a tenant on my equity deed.
I was talking to a friend of mine who is very knowledgeable in the field of property rights and he told me where is the law which requires us to register our deeds with the county?
He says there isn't, we just do it because everyone else has.
Sell you property to me for $25.00 and make it a matter of public record. Then notify the county where you had your property registered that you sold your property to John Doe giving them a copy of the public record. Tell the county assessor that as far as you know John is not going to register the deed with them. Buy back your property for $26.50 and hold on to the transactions and legal documents and keep them in a safe place. There will be nothing to lien at the county level because as far as the records show that property is not registered with them and county loses jurisdiction and therefore the IRS loses it as well. |
|
|
|
loybost
Regular Member
USA
29 Posts |
Posted - 04 Dec 2003 : 23:13:19
|
Greetings Brother Gary,
You make an excelent point (as you tend to do). Do you use gold or silver in this process?
Peace and Grace,
Loy
Loy Robert: Bost, III |
|
|
|
Surveyor
Regular Member
USA
31 Posts |
Posted - 05 Dec 2003 : 07:34:25
|
quote:
Originally posted by gsgkill
property rights and tax liens
We always seem make the obvious sheep like moves. Like good robots we buy a pieces of property and run right down and register it with the county register of deeds office, why?
So they can become part owners of our property? so we can say look I own this property? now you can bond it I'll pay rent we will call it tax! Oh yes and make me a tenant on my equity deed.
I was talking to a friend of mine who is very knowledgeable in the field of property rights and he told me where is the law which requires us to register our deeds with the county?
He says there isn't, we just do it because everyone else has.
Sell you property to me for $25.00 and make it a matter of public record. Then notify the county where you had your property registered that you sold your property to John Doe giving them a copy of the public record. Tell the county assessor that as far as you know John is not going to register the deed with them. Buy back your property for $26.50 and hold on to the transactions and legal documents and keep them in a safe place. There will be nothing to lien at the county level because as far as the records show that property is not registered with them and county loses jurisdiction and therefore the IRS loses it as well.
|
|
|
|
Surveyor
Regular Member
USA
31 Posts |
Posted - 05 Dec 2003 : 07:37:44
|
This is about the same as knowing that here is no law that requires anyone to get a license or a social security number either but just knowing this wont solve the problems of living without them. How do you plan to make the transfer a matter of public record without recording the deed. The tax man will not likely change the way the property is assessed until he has a recorded deed on record. As far as he would be concerned the property would still be in your name. This is how the property would be liened and you will still be fighting the same battle.
|
|
|
|
gsgkill
Regular Member
USA
30 Posts |
Posted - 05 Dec 2003 : 20:41:45
|
| I flinky dad sold my property ( legal description) to John Doe on (date,day and year. Same way you would copy write your name. When Published in the paper give heading Notice of Public Record. |
|
|
|
gsgkill
Regular Member
USA
30 Posts |
Posted - 05 Dec 2003 : 22:53:29
|
You can put together your abstract and $10.00 send a copy to The Bureau of Land Management requesting the certified copy Allodial title and take it to the country register of deeds and file it under misc. Cause they won't let file it where it needs to be. In essence you accomplish nothing. But at least you get the satisfaction of having an argument with them.
You can ask the County Assessor to give you a list copy of all the current bonds and interest rates and totals. You ask for all the past matured bonds there interest rates and totals. Once you get the list you ask for your percentage in the county to pay the current bonds including interest in full. If there are current bonds posted. Pay up front your percentage plus interest. Then make a public record in the newspaper heading Notice of public record I john Doe paid all my percentage of bonds ## and # in full. I have fired all past trustee's of my property (legal description) and have appointed myself as sole trustee. I hereby notice the county they must have my consent to enter me into any future bond contracts. I know a lady who did this successfully. She paid $800.00 up front for her share. The question is are there current unpaid bonds? You know that school bond they have been trying to pass for the last 10 years. But we might just keep paying those bonds which are not active anyway because everyone else does.
Isn't there something in the bible that says that gold and silver becomes worthless. I believe, I read that but cant seem to find it. You can buy silver dollars for $6.00 to 9.00. You can buy a $20.00 gold piece for what $300?. You can buy a silver round for 5.85.
Can you by gas with a silver dollar? Sure you can take your expensive silver dollar and by a dollars worth of gas. Could you buy gas with a $20.00 gold piece? maybe you could barter fifty bucks. You could sell any of that to a collector or a coin shop for FRN's So you tell me what spends in this New World Order? The only thing gold and silver is worth is what it is worth to me. This is why they have removed all the silver from the coins you can't spend the stamped dollar amount and stay solvent. In essence you could say gold and silver has been made worthless.
Watch out for claim jumpers, remember that's why we register those deeds. .
I know a small town in Missouri. The city wanted to pull a sneaky, so they published a notice of public record in Missouri but on the other side of the state. It was legal.and sneaky but legal. I don't see why you couldn't also make it a mater of pubic record you purchased said property back in the same way. |
|
|
|
Surveyor
Regular Member
USA
31 Posts |
Posted - 06 Dec 2003 : 09:40:48
|
Ezek:7:19: They shall cast their silver in the streets, and their gold shall be removed: their silver and their gold shall not be able to deliver them in the day of the wrath of the LORD: they shall not satisfy their souls, neither fill their bowels: because it is the stumblingblock of their iniquity.
Is this not what the people have already done back in the 30's.
Now the people cannot deliver themselves by gold and silver because they are bound in a legal relationship with the State by which they have lost ownership to all their substance and have not the price of redemption.
|
|
|
|
gsgkill
Regular Member
USA
30 Posts |
Posted - 06 Dec 2003 : 11:16:35
|
Just a small dream. off topic i guess
I own one city block of in the town where I live. What makes me a slave in this county is the sheep running the county. You use to be able to buy 6 inches of intercourse from intercourse Nevada. Now I wonder if 100,000 people purchased 100,000 one inch tracts of land would you now be a voting member of the County? Where by you could vote the sheep out and position informed members to become county assessor, sheriff, mayor, city councilman, Judge, policeman, register of deeds office. district rep? In my county there are about 3000 registered voters and only about a 3rd vote. the last election the sheriff won by 15 votes You could take this country back county by county. The same people in my county hold there office for life. They are never voted out. I would be glad to send one silver dollar for a tract of land one inch square and register my one inch square plot of property with the county I would be glad to pay my tiny tax. I would be glad to become a registered voter in your county. The trouble is were are a divided country. I live here you live there. I would wager that apfn.org could organize such an endeavor. |
|
|
|
gsgkill
Regular Member
USA
30 Posts |
Posted - 07 Dec 2003 : 20:21:05
|
I just read an article and then used several links like findlaw to several legal dictionaries on line. http://dictionary.lp.findlaw.com/dictionary.html
i found this website. I'm just new at this I went into shock once again.
the premises that we were al born into bondage is true. the premise that we are free is false. THE key legal word for to day is registered. as defined:
security and bond
security as defined in law under registed:
1 a: something (as a mortgage or collateral) that is provided to make certain the fulfillment of an obligation
Example: used his property as security for a loan
2.evidence of indebtedness, ownership, or the right to ownership
3.evidence of investment in a common enterprise (as a corporation or partnership) made with the expectation of deriving a profit solely from the efforts of others who acquire control over the funds invested
Example: a security involves some form of investment contract
bond as defined:in law under registered::
1 a: a usu. formal written agreement by which a person undertakes to perform a certain act (as appear in court or fulfill the obligations of a contract) or abstain from performing an act (as committing a crime) with the condition that failure to perform or abstain will obligate the person or often a surety to pay a sum of money or will result in the forfeiture of money put up by the person or surety.
b: one who acts as a surety
2: an interest-bearing document giving evidence of a debt issued by a government body or corporation that is sometimes secured by a lien on property and is often designed to take care of a particular financial need
(see also collateralized mortgage obligation)
also
: the money put up
Note: The purpose of a bond is to provide an incentive for the fulfillment of an obligation. It also provides reassurance that the obligation will be fulfilled and that compensation is available if it is not fulfilled. In most cases a surety is involved, and the bond makes the surety responsible for the consequences of the obligated person's behavior. Some bonds, such as fidelity bonds, function as insurance agreements, in which the surety promises to pay for financial loss caused by the bad behavior of an obligated person or by some contingency over which the person may have no control.
what does this all mean?????
Your parents registered your birth certificate with the state; it became a surity and a bond was taken on it. ie your a slave.
You registered your car it stop being your car. You registered you deed it stopped being yours. You registered to vote as an adult you became by your signature a debtor without even title to your own self. With you permission!!!!!
when you registered your fire arm it became not yours and therefore under the right to keep and bare arms it does not apply to you.
Everything you think you own is bonded and security is placed upon it.
This is where the bible comes in:
Da:8:5: And as I was considering, behold, an he goat came from the west on the face of the whole earth, and touched not the ground: and the goat had a notable horn between his eyes.
A he goat is actually a she goat and the, and the goat is a he goat. The first Goat mentioned is a she goat and the second a he goat. But the word goat does not mean an animal.
It describes a nature of something.
The first goat = strong 5795. The second goat = prancing skipping around depart early 6842
West = the region of the evening sun, barter, mortgage, occupy, surety 4628
Touched = violently strike, punish, destroy, beat, lay the hand upon 5060
Notable = compact, agreement behold, 2380
Ground = nations, wilderness, world to be firm 776
Face = whole earth
Earth = nations 776
Whole = all 3605
Between = within 996
Came = came 935
So here is my take on this;
Since I already know what the horn is; putting it into perspective as to the horn is.
Horn - Hebrew word 7161 a peak of a mountain corner of an altar, rays, shine, a ray of light.
Triangle, corner, rays, ONE eye
The English translation for eyes is Hebrew word 5870 is eye. (Singular) not Plural
As I was considering behold an strong (NEW WORLD ORDER)came to barter, mortgage, surety and occupy on the face of all the nations (GLOBAL) and did not violently strike the nations and the (NEW WORLD ORDER) made an agreement(TREATIES)(CONTRACTS) with the triangle that had the eye within. .
http://dictionary.lp.findlaw.com/dictionary.html
http://www.wealth4freedom.com/truth/birth-certificate.htm
|
|
|
|
Jaywood216
Occasional Poster
USA
13 Posts |
Posted - 13 Jan 2004 : 18:52:06
|
Hi All,
I'm a new guy here and have read with interest the various points of view. One thing I would like to ask of someone is this: I have read in several places about activating the TDA but I don't seem to find anywhere the process for doing it. Can someone fill me in on this, Thanks, Jim |
|
|
|
Lewish
Advanced Member
uSA
496 Posts |
Posted - 13 Jan 2004 : 22:28:48
|
Hi Jay,
You can't find the process, because there is no such thing relative to Redemption. A Treasury Direct Account is an account you open with the Treasury so that you can buy and sell Treasury bonds, notes, T-bills, etc.
Hope this helps,
Lewis |
|
|
|
DanielJacob
Advanced Member
USA
138 Posts |
Posted - 14 Jan 2004 : 00:52:44
|
Lewis,
Perhaps you could or would elucidate us a little further on the obtaining of the Treasury Direct Account. I have read about this on several forums but have yet to have someone explain it. Thanks..
Peace brother... |
|
|
|
Lewish
Advanced Member
uSA
496 Posts |
Posted - 14 Jan 2004 : 14:37:01
|
Daniel,
If you want a Treasury Direct Account, go to www.treasurydirect.gov and follow the instructions under "Open an Account".
Lewis |
Edited by - Lewish on 14 Jan 2004 14:37:43 |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
|
|
UCC "Redemption" Scheme
