| Author |
 Topic  |
|
Owenbrittont
Advanced Member
USA
86 Posts |
 Posted - 14 Apr 2003 : 22:39:50
|
I'm a little confused in how to invoke the UCC on the said authorities. I've been studying the UCC system for nearly four years, and do agree that we are in the system in one way because we've been registered into it.
Anyone have any good web sites that summarize the main points of getting from the Security Agreement on your alternate corporate entity (Strawman) to invoking penalties on said authorities by non judicial foreclosure... and how to enforce it ????? |
 |
|
|
doer
Advanced Member
uSA
198 Posts |
Posted - 14 Apr 2003 : 22:45:47
|
Sovereign1,
Some questions regarding your admonition:
To which UCC filing do you refer?
What do you mean by a "14th amendment person?
How do you "expatriate from the corp. USA"?
How do you "repatriate under the United States of America for
commonlaw trade name usage"? (I thought that we ALL have a
Common Law right to copyright our names.)
What kind of "excellent outcomes" are you getting?
Be Well,
Doer
|
|
|
|
Kevin Kranz
Regular Member
Albania
26 Posts |
Posted - 14 Apr 2003 : 23:22:25
|
I would like to know what you mean by the 14th amendment.
Also it has been put around by the someone, that you cannot copyright your name. However.
The fact is this, that because the evil ones who got this secret Code and put it in force unbeknowns to us all, have now got caught in their own net, because,our strawman name, which is in all capital letters, is our commercial or trade name that we copyright, like McDonalds trade name. Now when we copyright our strawman name it is written in the copyright contract that any, and all derivitives, or abreviations, of that name are also included in the copyright, which is private property, and when they use it, even in a letter or anywhere, it is a breach of the copyright act.
Now Christians can speak out like never before and fear not, that you will not ever be publically humiliated ever again. Gods enemies will eventually learn not to touch His annointed ones from speaking up. Praise the Lord forever. Turnkey |
|
|
|
Lewish
Advanced Member
uSA
496 Posts |
Posted - 15 Apr 2003 : 01:32:19
|
| Sovereign1, please forgive me, but you are giving erroneous information. When a person expatriates from the U.S., they are still bound by their adhesion contracts for a period of 10 years. There is extensive court documentation on this fact. The groups who are selling their expatriation/repatriation packages are ripping people off. I can also point you to cases of people who expatriated to Canada, became Canadian citizens, and yet still had to answer to U.S. courts. |
Edited by - Lewish on 15 Apr 2003 02:24:39 |
|
|
|
Lewish
Advanced Member
uSA
496 Posts |
Posted - 15 Apr 2003 : 01:49:33
|
Kevin, they are talking about the 14th amendment to the U.S. Consititution. It converted the free men of this country into slaves of the government because people accepted it without realizing what it was all about. And it is because of it that the Strawman exists, so that the government can legally interact with the Man and control us.
As to copyrighting your name. To just make such a statement is to be unclear as to what you mean. However, to say you want to copyright the name of the Strawman is clear. No one can copyright their Christian appellation.
Now when it comes to copyrights, there are 3 kinds: common-law, Common Law, and Commercial Law. In the U.S. you can not do a Commerical Law copyright on your Strawman's name, but in some states you can do a Trade Name registration of it. The old common-law copyright was replaced by the Statute of Anne, then the Berne Convention, and finally in the U.S. by the Copyright Act of 1976. Thus you can't use it either, because it has become the Commercial Law. But Common Law, which is the law of the sovereign people can be used to copyright your Strawman's name. Is is done by affidavit, which is then recorded in a government office. Here, it is the county recorder. Any affidavit, which is undisputed, in law, stands as truth. And, any affidavit which is disputed, must be disputed point by point, or the dispute is null and void. In the event that there is no government office in which to record your affidavit, you can publish it in the newspaper, once a week for 4 weeks, and it will stand with the same validity. But, putting it in the newspaper is expensive, as my copyright is seven pages long.
I hope this helps.
Peace in the Name of the Lord Jesus,
Lewis |
Edited by - Lewish on 15 Apr 2003 01:51:57 |
|
|
|
Lewish
Advanced Member
uSA
496 Posts |
Posted - 15 Apr 2003 : 02:23:17
|
Sovereign1, please forgive me again, but you are also erroneous about UCC filings resulting people going to jail. If you would bother to check Barton Buhtz's February newsletter, you will see where the U.S. Treasury has confirmed that they are holding some 20 million UCC-1 filings against Strawmen. Now, if you were going to go to jail for filing a UCC-1 against your Strawman, I would think that the jails would be overflowing with such people. Don't you?
Please get your facts straight, back them up with cites and court cases, and don't lead people astray. |
|
|
|
Kevin Kranz
Regular Member
Albania
26 Posts |
Posted - 16 Apr 2003 : 03:27:56
|
HI guys! We have found that it is working very well in being able to copyright your strawman.
Now in the copyright notice we have worded it:- that all and any derivitives and variations in the spelling of said trade-name/trade-mark. KEVIN KRANZ may neither be used, nor in any manner whatso-ever with out written prior,express, written consent and acknowledgement of Kevin Kranz as signified by the red ink signature ETC.
We have made it a self executing contract/security agreement in the event of unauthorised use.
If you read this carefully you will see that the apellation name is included in the copyright because it is a derivitive of the strawman.
Bless God. |
|
|
|
DanielJacob
Advanced Member
USA
138 Posts |
Posted - 17 Apr 2003 : 12:40:18
|
Brothers,
Red Ink, blue ink, black ink.... Then I wonder why I am beginning to question my beliefs. Can someone please direct me to the source for such remarks or at least shed some light upon why they would elect to use one color over another. I always thought that it would be best to use blue ink on your originals so that you could make copies, copies show up black, to send to those you wanted to and then you could retain the originals as such.
Peace to all... |
|
|
|
Lewish
Advanced Member
uSA
496 Posts |
Posted - 17 Apr 2003 : 13:12:34
|
Brother DanielJacob,
You use red ink on the copyright for several reasons. One of which is to show that it is done under Common Law. Another is, so that if anyone copies your signature on a copying machine, it will come out black. At least that was the theory until color copiers became prevalent.
Blue ink is used on any legally binding contract. If you notice, when you get a loan or mortgage, they always fill out their part in blue ink. This goes way back, and I don't know the origin.
Hope this helps. Everything has its reason. Sometimes it is just hard to find.
Lewis |
|
|
|
doer
Advanced Member
uSA
198 Posts |
Posted - 18 Apr 2003 : 01:26:26
|
Red ink is also symbolic of blood. This distinguishes the flesh-and-blood Man from his commercial alter-ego, the StrawMan.
Doer |
|
|
|
DanielJacob
Advanced Member
USA
138 Posts |
Posted - 19 Apr 2003 : 12:13:38
|
Brothers,
I can understand the symbolism of the red ink as representing blood. However, if that is all that it is, then it has no particular standing in Law and is therefore irrelevant. These are the types of questions that I eluded to in my EGO post. Why are we prone to accept, purely upon its face, prima facie, statements made by well meaning people and brothers that has no foundation in Law. Then we sit and wonder why we those that have the obligation of acting according to law ignore our processes. Could it be that they believe that we don’t have a clue because we are focused upon some particular color of ink? Just my thoughts.
Peace to all.
|
|
|
|
Lewish
Advanced Member
uSA
496 Posts |
Posted - 19 Apr 2003 : 14:16:13
|
There is foundation in Law. It is just not something that is easy to pull up at a moments notice.
A few of years ago, I bought a new car. The purchse agreement was typed in BLUE ink. Last year, I attempted to buy a new pickup truck. The purchase agreement was again typed in BLUE ink. This was a different dealer, different brand of vehicle.
Now, BLUE ribbons for typewriters are not your everyday item. So, there is some legal foundation for why they went to the trouble of procuring BLUE ribbons for the typewriters.
I will try to spend some more time trying to find the LAW foundation for the colors of ink.
Remember the Sacrifice our Lord made at this time of year,
Lewis |
|
|
|
DanielJacob
Advanced Member
USA
138 Posts |
Posted - 19 Apr 2003 : 15:21:41
|
Brother Lewis,
Interesting facts; I too am researching for substantiate the use of different colors of ink. I know that several years ago it was claimed that any lawful document had to be signed in blue ink. It was just accepted as fact given that those making the statements were purported to be the "experts" at that time and other statements made by them were in fact based upon research that could be confirmed by anyone willing to put forth the effort to go to a law library or other well stocked public library.
Peace to all. |
|
|
|
Robert-James
Advanced Member
uSA
353 Posts |
Posted - 19 Apr 2003 : 17:14:37
|
| Greetings. On a similar vein, the English Royal stationary always has a red thread in the paper. All English Royal Navy rope on its ships has a red thread in it. Why? Something about the Zerah line of Judah, and the red thread tied to a boys foot thousands of years ago. The inner mind can pick up on symbols whereas the conscious mind is totally dumbed down to an almost blind state of {non} being. Now, don't get me wrong, the Queen Elizabeth is a LEGAL FICTION, but the Abrahamic covenants are un-conditional to a chosen race of people...Israelites. Zerah has something to do with "day break". |
|
|
|
Owenbrittont
Advanced Member
USA
86 Posts |
Posted - 08 Jun 2003 : 20:56:32
|
| Some court or State filings only accept blue ink . ????? |
|
|
|
Owenbrittont
Advanced Member
USA
86 Posts |
Posted - 08 Jun 2003 : 21:02:09
|
| Is there a general format for the copyright / trademark and where to file it ???? |
|
|
|
Lewish
Advanced Member
uSA
496 Posts |
Posted - 08 Jun 2003 : 21:06:10
|
The common-law copyright, NOT a trademark, is recorded in the county you reside in. Many people are now also recording them in the county of their birth. A trademark is a commercial entity. The common-law copyright is over the fiction.
Contact me via private message and I can give you a copy of mine. It is seven pages long and derived from many others. There are still things I want to add to it when I get time.
Lewis |
|
|
|
Paul88
Regular Member
USA
31 Posts |
Posted - 22 Jul 2003 : 01:39:52
|
Hello all,
Could anyone tell me where I could start with UCC1? I would like to cancel all my contracts and copyright my Strawman. Also, after I copyright my SM I understand that no office or judge will be able to use my name, therefore leave me in piece? Also will this let me cancel my car loan, and mortgage?
G.D bless you all
Paul, |
|
|
|
doer
Advanced Member
uSA
198 Posts |
Posted - 22 Jul 2003 : 03:41:02
|
Paul,
See my post in response to your other question on the Topic, Obtained Manufacturer's Certificate of Origin |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
Cop Financially Ruined 4 ticketing Motorist
