Demand for Written Bill of Particulars

<John James: Smith>, suae potestate esse, et uxor, Lawful cover for <Jane Doe: Smith>, feme covert

Demandant; against,
<John Q. Patrolman>, , STATE OF <your State>,
<MUNICIPAL COURT, CITY OF CRIME>, <whatever is stated on the papers you were given>

Defendants

(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)

Case No. <registered mail number - Sheriff's number>

Petition:

Lawful Demand for Written Bill of Particulars

Dated: The <twenty-first day of the second month>, in the Year of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus, The Christ, <nineteenth hundred and ninety-nine>.

By <John James: Smith>, suae potestate esse, et uxor, by Authority of the Law of Coverture of and over His Lawful Christian Wife, <Jane Doe: Smith>, feme covert:

In the matter of: <Traffic citation No. 12345-678> and it’s accompanying abandoned paper marked with the unlawful and invalid personae designata <JANE DOE, JANE SMITH, Jane D. Smith>, misnomers:

This is a Lawful Demand for a Written Bill of Particulars, issued by and under the Ministerial Power and Authority vested solely in and appertaining to the Ministerial Office of Christ, established in Truth and Substance by the Grace of God through Our Sovereign Lord and Savior Jesus, the Christ, and which is the Foundation of Law, customs, and usages common among all Good and Lawful Christians, being co-heirs and appointed co-executors of His Testament governing His Estate brought into being by His original Act sworn to by Him in His Testament, and in execution of the Judgments declared therein by Him, against <the same Defendants as entered above>, acting Alien Enemies of Our Sovereign Lord and Savior for whom I am one of several appointed Ministerial Officers;

All parties take notice the above named Demandant is herewith submitting this timely Lawful Demand for a Written Bill of Particulars to the above named Defendants and their fellow agents and principals as presently known to be the <Police Officers, Prosecuting Officers, Superior Court of Your State Officers, Corporate Your State Municipality and its Officers, and the corporate State of Your State described above>;

The Demandant is herein requiring that this Bill of Particulars be fully answered, responded to, and presented to the Demandant in the timely manner specified below so that the Demandant may ascertain the particular nature and cause of the accusations being made against the Demandant, and such that the greater purpose of God’s Law may be accomplished to the Christian and general usage of the due Process of His Law;

This Demand for a Lawful Bill of Particulars is being made within the jurisdiction and venue of the above court ekklesia, as is proper according to due process of Law. As is required in Law, all questions herein made to the Defendants must be answered truly, correctly, completely, and with full awareness of the penalties for bearing false Witness against Almighty God. Failure to answer, plead, or otherwise perfect the Record in Law in response to the said questions will be deemed as an abandonment of prosecution by the Defendants to lay, evidence, and prove in Law before this Honourable Court any purported right or claim against the Demandant;

The Demandant is without sufficient knowledge as to the nature and cause of the purported accusations made and being made by the Defendants in this matter so as to make a response to any pleading or a defense to the ongoing unlawful persecution of the Demandant in a foreign and strange venue of unknown and purported law. The Demandant is aware that these types of unlawful persecutions will not be prosecuted in the Defendant’s foreign venue in the Demandant’s Lawful Christian Appellation, as shown above. Thusly, it is unlawful to bring any proceedings against this Demandant in any other misnomer than that in which I have herein represented my true Christian Appellation to be.

Take notice that failure to acknowledge the Demandant by his or her proper Christian Appellation is prima facie evidence of evil Faith and malicious prosecution of an unlawful criminal nature by the Defendants;

The Defendants must respond and answer these particular questions presented in the reasonable time of ten days, as is usual and customary in due process of Law. Defendants may make a good faith written request showing a bona fide need for more time than ten days, and with a showing of reasonable facts in support as to why more time should be allowed, the Demandant may allow Defendants to respond within an additional time. Otherwise, failure to respond within ten days from receipt of this Demand will result in a default against the Defendants.

One. What is the correct spelling, including proper capitalization, punctuation and consecutive wording order, in Lawful English, of all of the Defendants herein specifically named?

Two. What is the correct spelling, including proper capitalization, punctuation and consecutive wording order, in Lawful English, of any principal on whose behalf any Defendant is acting, either directly or as an agent or Officer?

Three. What is the correct spelling, including proper capitalization, punctuation and consecutive wording order, of all Statutory Licensed ‘Bar’ Attorneys and other Counsel for all of the Defendant’s principles in this matter?

Four. What are the correct names, spellings, including proper capitalization, punctuation and consecutive wording order, of all corporate Officers and Agents by which <Police Officer B. Smith> is being directed, supervised or instructed in this matter?

Five. What is the specific ‘Cause of Action’ which is purported to have taken place in this matter? What specific ‘Damages’ are purported to have been sustained as a result of this purported ‘Cause of Action’?

Six. Who, by name, is the ‘person’ which is purportedly to have been ‘Damaged’ and upon which the Defendant’s matter or matters are purportedly based?

Seven. Is the actual ‘Damage’, upon which the Defendant’s Cause of Action is purportedly based, the result of a breach of Contract; If so, what is the particular ‘Nature of the Contract’, and how and when, with particularity, has the Demandant become enjoined into this Contract?

Eight. Are the Defendant’s seeking to institute a secretive jurisdiction and venue against the Demandant by lodging this matter in a <Superior Court of Your State>?

Nine. The Lawful court ecclesia in which Demandant has pledged to be held accountable before Almighty God and His Laws is the <Kingdom of Christ superior court, Your county, Your state>. What is each Defendant’s purpose for failing to Lawfully lodge their accusations in Demandant’s court of Law for judgement?

Ten. Is this matter being used in any way in attempt to gather funds for the servicing of any bankruptcy by any of the Defendants; and, are any of the Defendants acting as agents for principals who are in any way attempting to gather funds for the servicing of any bankruptcy?

Eleven. Is there any Military or Executive jurisdiction or venue being exercised by any of the Defendants?

Twelve. Is there any de facto, as opposed to de jure, governmental agency involved in any way with any matter concerning the Defendants?

Thirteen. Please show that you are physically capable of writing the true and correct Christian Appellation or proper name of the Demandant by so writing it. Please write the complete Lawful praenomen, nomen, and cognomen of the Demandant using the proper upper and lower case spelling, ordering and punctuation, as prescribed by Lawful and proper English.

Fourteen. How is the Defendant’s Appellation or ‘name’ written as shown in the papers you have knowledge of or have made yourself in this matter?

Fifteen. Does any Defendant claim, assert, or believe that the Lawful and True Christian name of the Demandant is correctly spelled, punctuated and ordered on all the paper Defendant’s have written or produced in this matter?

Sixteen. If the answer to question fifteen is ‘Yes’, then what facts are you relying upon to make that claim?

Seventeen. If the answer to question fifteen is ‘No’, are you willing to dismiss this case with regards to its Lawful applicability to this Demandant? If not, why not?

Eighteen. Do you claim that the Demandant is not a Good and Lawful Christian nor a Lawful inhabitant and dweller of the premises in the jurisdictional venue of <Your> state?

Nineteen. Do you believe or claim that the Demandant is an artificial, fictitious or statutorily created ‘person’? If so, specify which type or type of 'person' or ‘persons’ you believe the Demandant to be.

Twenty. If you believe or claim that the Demandant is an artificial, fictitious or statutorily created ‘person’, what facts do you allege to support your assertion?

Twenty-one. Are the papers you have submitted, or have direct knowledge of in this matter, entered or submitted in the Lawful Appellation or name of the Demandant?

Twenty-two. Does any entity, corporation, or association with any form of spelling of the proper name "<Your State>", in any capitalized or non capitalized combination thereof, have any interest what-so-ever in the Demandant’s matter herein referenced?

Twenty-three. Is the difference in capitalization of letters between the term "<STATE OF YOUR STATE>" as compared to the phrase "<Your state, i.e. Florida State>" an indicator that the state referred to as "<Your state>" is not the "<STATE OF YOUR STATE>"?

Twenty-four. If the answer to question twenty-three is ‘no’, what is the Basis in Law for allowing the Defendants or their agencies to sit in judgement as a Lawful court in this matter?

Twenty-five. If the answer to question twenty-three is ‘yes’, is one of the spellings shown in that question a de facto, military, or bankrupt entity? If so, what condition is the entity in, being either bankrupt, de facto, or military?

Twenty-six. Are the papers filed or submitted by Defendants in this matter in a court of record within the Lawful venue and jurisdictional boundaries of <Your> state?

Twenty-seven. Is the Defendant’s purported indictment a criminal case, i.e., is there any possibility of incarceration, imprisonment, or a criminal fine, and if so, which?

Twenty-eight. Is the referenced matter and purported indictment either a civil or remedial case?

Twenty-nine. If the answer to question twenty-eight is ‘yes’, is it either partially or fully civil?

Thirty. Do you claim or believe that this matter is one pertaining to violations of malum prohibitum or ‘acts prohibited’ and that this is not a matter involving any malum in se or ‘wrong of itself’?

Thirty-one. If the answer to the preceding question is ‘yes’, what is the Basis in Law and Fact for presuming that the Demandant is subject to malum prohibitum?

Thirty-two. Do you claim or believe that there is an injured or damaged party in this matter as evidenced by a Corpus Delicti or body evidencing a crime, as under the principles of God’s Laws, the Christian common Law?

Thirty-three. If there is any damaged party, state the amount of compensatory damage sought in lawful money including damage estimates from two reliable sources. State any amount being sought for punitive relief pursuant to this matter.

Thirty-four. If either "<Your state>" or the "<STATE OF YOUR STATE>" or the "<State of Your State>" is alleged to be a damaged or injured party in this matter, give the name, address and the state of residence of one or more citizens who were injured.

Thirty-five. Are you, or any of the Defendants, or agencies of the Defendants, or the principles in this matter, in a condition of bankruptcy? If so, by what authority do you or any Defendant claim a right to indict or petition as a principal?

Thirty-six. Are you a principal party of interest in this matter, or are any proceedings in this matter being brought in your name as an agent for another principal? If so, what is the name of said principal party of interest?

Thirty-seven. Do you believe or claim that the actions set forth in the purported action against the Demandant were committed outside of the Lawful venue, jurisdiction and premises of the people of <Your> state? Was this <traffic citation> initiated in some other jurisdiction, venue or premises related to any legislative venue or jurisdiction of the de facto STATE OF <YOUR STATE>?

Thirty-nine. Do you believe or claim that the "STATE OF <YOUR STATE>", as such phrase is used in the paper belonging to the Defendants in this matter, is a Federal territorial district, or Territory, or other Property belonging to the United States as defined or used in Article IV, Section 3 of the Constitution for the United States of America?

Forty. Do you believe or claim that the "COUNTY OF <YOUR COUNTY>", as such phrase is used in the paper belonging to the Defendants in this matter, is any form of either a de facto, military, or other governmental structure?

Forty-one. Do you contend that the Demandant acted in any jurisdiction or venue other than the "state of <Your State>"? If so, which specific jurisdiction and what facts are relied upon to support this contention?

Forty-two. Is the purported indictment, as referred to and purportedly entered into by the Defendants in this matter, being prosecuted by a public prosecutor under the general powers of a Lawful civil government, unfettered by legal disabilities including bankruptcy, military rule or intervention, or any form of de facto governmental oversight or control? If not, is this case being prosecuted by a common informer or other such private prosecutor?

Forty-three. Is the "<SUPERIOR COURT OF YOUR STATE>", where the purported criminal matter against the Demandant is allegedly being prosecuted, a court which is Lawfully empowered and competent to render full justice in Law if a counterclaim of a criminal nature is advanced?

Forty-five. Are you and any Attorneys, Counsel, Defendants, Defendant’s Principles, Judges, and others unknown, fully competent, informed and knowledgeable of the merits of Law when proceeding to unlawfully prosecute this matter, and being fully aware of the potential penalties for being involved in a wrongful prosecution? Do you have knowledge about the crimes known as Malicious Prosecution, Extortion, Fraud, Malfeasance of Office, Perjury of Oaths, Participating in Corrupt Organizations (RICO), Legal Malice, Malpractice, contributing to a False Imprisonment, Theft of Property, and other similar matters?

The foregoing Demand for a Written Bill of Particulars is not to be construed as ‘discovery’, a traverse into any matter, an appearance in Defendant’s purported jurisdiction or venue, a waiver of any Lawful Rights, or in any way a motion or joinder to the referenced matter or to any unlawful tribunal, nor discovery to the merits of the matter.

Failure by Defendants, singularly or collectively, to timely and completely respond to this Demand will be construed as an unlawful act by each or all Defendants to willfully withhold full disclosure of the Nature and Cause of the purported accusations you are instituting, or have already instituted, in the referenced matter, and will make it impossible under Law for the Demandant to meaningfully enter into any Joinder of Issues with Defendants as regards to the merits of Defendant’s accusations or purported indictments.

Notification is herewith entered that there will be no Lawful response, traverse, or defense by the Demandant against any purported accusations, indictments, or judicial process being made by Defendants. Failure to provide a true, sworn, accurate and complete Bill of Particulars shall be construed as a failure to prosecute, a request to dismiss, and constructive intent by the Defendants and all related co-Defendants to enter a nolle prosequi by tacit procuration.

Sealed, under Authority, and by Direction of Christ Jesus, by His Direct Act of My own hand on the <eighth day of the second month> in the Year of Our Lord and Savior, Christ Jesus, <nineteen hundred ninety-nine>.

Solely by the Grace of God do I have the Honor of Being a Good and Lawful Christian Man.