| Author |
 Topic  |
|
True North
Advanced Member
USA
163 Posts |
 Posted - 11 Apr 2004 : 06:00:20
|
Salutations on your victory David Merrill
Your piece on the sceptre has been on my mind since you were last here, care to share it with me now?
Refusal for process didn't take root to my satisfaction, at least as concerns many of this forum, although it was discussed some. Laziness to follow through in district court with the refusal I suppose. Many seem to think that refusal at the mailbox would intimidate and therefore stop the disruption of the trust.
Welcome back
TN |
 |
|
|
David Merrill
Advanced Member
USA
1147 Posts |
Posted - 11 Apr 2004 : 17:11:23
|
I do not keep these things around. So I am not sure what "piece" you refer to. My basic take on the Sceptre of Genesis 49:10 is that the international banking cartel have been functioning as trustees of the original estate under a quasi-Judaism known as Ashkenazim/Khazarian, but even then only the "Elite" such as houses Rothschild and Roosevelt.
I am not clear about the 'taking root' reference but recall that I felt that I had left the basics and touched base. The refusal for cause is returned timely to the presenter and if you have secured an evidence repository in the U.S. Courthouse (a file jacket) you may acquire the United States' cognizance of the timely refusal. By sending a copy of the clerk instruction with the original refusal for cause back to the presenter, the presenter better understands there is no cause to develop.
Maybe I can explain that better now than before.
Regards,
David Merrill.
|
|
|
|
berkano
Advanced Member
uSA
129 Posts |
Posted - 13 Apr 2004 : 19:55:41
|
quote:
Originally posted by Lewish
Hello David,
I wondered for years how the Babylonians came up with 360 degrees in a circle. Then one day it hit me!
1*1*1*1*2*2*2*3*3*5=360.
Drats, now what do I do with that bit of info?
Lewis
Put it in a pipe and smoke it ;) |
|
|
|
berkano
Advanced Member
uSA
129 Posts |
Posted - 13 Apr 2004 : 19:58:55
|
quote:
Originally posted by David Merrill
*1*1*1*2*2*2*3*3*5=360.
I'm not sure I get it, specially the '1's. But it seems familiar.
What to do with it? I usually wait for patterns and consistencies to develop. Then if that happens maybe a theory? Then proving the theory, a useful tool.
Thanks, I am going to try to remember where I saw this before. My presumption has always been related to days in the solar year.
David Merrill.
[I was half asleep when "Keely"; I think its John Keely, kind of a non-famous Tesla of the last century. He or his modern followers use this notation breaking down octaves in harmonics. Is that it?]
It is believed by some that the solar year used to be exactly 360 days, equivalent to the degrees of a circle. I've read that some think the earth's orbit has been changed slightly by astronomical cataclysms, bringing different seasons as a result and a slightly longer year.
Any thoughts or insights? |
|
|
|
berkano
Advanced Member
uSA
129 Posts |
Posted - 13 Apr 2004 : 20:05:59
|
quote:
Originally posted by David Merrill
P.S. I feel I owe you all a debt of gratitude. The paranoia is the major stultifying factor inhibiting conveyance of the original estate to the heirs apparent. I think this forum, locked down, gagged or not, is very productive. This is going faster than I thought.
I might have missed something. Who is evincing paranoia? What is meant by this forum, "locked down, gagged?" Who is gagging and locking down the fourm? Is this in reference to Bondservant suggesting he might lock the forum from further posting? Are you referring to this Internet discussion forum or the forum of some court?
-- Berkano |
|
|
|
berkano
Advanced Member
uSA
129 Posts |
Posted - 13 Apr 2004 : 21:06:38
|
quote:
Originally posted by BatKol
Robert-James said: Greetings,
I suggest one read George Mercier's explaination on the FRN use. There is no legal-lawful contract involved. "Using FRN's under protest" negates their accusations.
BatKol: I never said there was a legal-lawful CONTRACT involved.
What is happening here is by using the FRN we are TRADING in it's REALM, fully regulated by the BEAST you claim to hate. You/we are trading on the VALUE of the CONTRACTS that back up the FRN. FRN'S under protest? LOL...Not much of a protest when we willfully choose to go out to WORK and sell our Labour by FRN, not much of a protest when we willfully choose to go to INGLES SUPERMARKET and eat CORP ENGINEERED FOOD. The FRN under protest is just a word game justification to take the sting off of our willfullness. I'd love to see you enter into discussion with a JUDGE and tell him you use FRNS under protest.. you would be one more added to the already long "failed arguments" list.
Berkano: How is using an FRN trading within the beast's realm? Since an FRN is nothing but a worthless piece of paper (not even large enough for toilet paper), how can it be considered a commodity for trade? The FRN does not back up the value of contracts. Paper cannot back up paper . . . FRN's are backed by the the full faith and credit of Waldo, which is nothing because nobody knows where Waldo is. ;) The use of FRN does not harm anyone. It is the issuance of FRN that is done harmfully. In the use of the FRN there is no actual value exchanged, there is no trade in fact, and therefore the use of the FRN is not regulatable (Legal Tender for ALL Debts). Moreover, I challenge you to explain how the use of an FRN constitutes sin, as you suggest. Keep in mind that the man asking you these questions has gone many times for weeks and months without a single FRN nor any need for one.
quote:
I notice you, Robert-James, keep avoiding explaning how a CONTRACT for the DOD INTERNET is "clean" and a CONTRACT for the DOT TAG is "not clean".
I'm not clear on what this means, so I'll surmise. You are suggesting the government "owns" the Internet and use of the Internet constitutes a contract? How? Where's the words to the contract, and where is the proof of agreement?
Actually, the Internet is millions of private networks connected together in a web of backbones and telcom lines. The government does not own the Internet, for it is a concept that defies ownership and even government regulation. I do happen to be an expert on the Internet, having worked in Engineering Escalations, and I tell you succinctly that the government owns the internet no more than it owns a private man's set of walkie-talkies.
quote:
Both contain your signature as a RESIDENT. Both say you agree to comply with all LAWS. Please explain this.
I've not signed anything to get Internet service. Are we to assume that someone else has? I've got T1 speed, lovin' it, lovin' it ;)
quote:
Robert-James: By your own words you will be judged. Could the accuser of the brethern be among us?
BatKol: Nice smoke-screen. There are many reading this who see you repeatedly refuse to answer the above question about the DOD INTERNET CONTRACT, yet have no problem publicly bragging that your "walk is unadultrated"... now, when you are being questioned as to the "hows and whys" you imply "accuser of the brethern". In a debate that would be called, fittingly, a 'strawman' tactic.
What is the DOD INTERNET CONTRACT?
-- Berkano |
|
|
|
berkano
Advanced Member
uSA
129 Posts |
Posted - 13 Apr 2004 : 21:26:36
|
quote:
Originally posted by BatKol
DanielJacob said: Does one have a DOD CONTRACT if one goes to a public forum to fellowship with the body over the INTERNET?
BatKol: Here is where I am coming from:
INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS are fully LICENCED and REGULATED to sell USAGE CONTRACTS for the WWW (ironically W in Hebrew is numerically 6). The WWW, as you already know, was created by the DofD, which is a DEPT of the US CORP.
The US CORP LICENSES the ISP CORPS (Your PROVIDER) to sell REGULATED ACCESS to this WWW via USER CONTRACTS. THOSE who sign or even electronicallly "agree" (THEY got your CREDITCARD at that point anyway) to these CONTRACTS are LEGALLY subject to all of the REGULATIONS (FCC, etc) of the www. If you have a copy of your CURRENT ISP CONTRACT read some of the language above the signature, or if you did it electronically, the WEBSITE of the ISP will have it. By CONTRACTING with this ISP you are agreeing to follow all FED, STATE, and LOCAL LAWS that GOVERN the INTERNET.
All word games and "justifications" aside it is easy to show that the WWW is BEAST JURISDICTION. One can easily test this JURISDICTION if they are foolish enough to. Try breaching a serious FCC INTERNET STATUTE and see what happens. The ISP who we CONTRACTED with, is in turn CONTRACTED with the US CORP. The ISP agrees to strict guidelines set forth by the US CORP and we, by CONTRACTING and USING the WWW via the ISP, agree also with these REGULATIONS.
We are literally PLUGGED into this JURISDICTION via our ISP CONTRACT and our physical USAGE of the www.
The question still remains: Why is this kind of CONTRACT to operate on a CORP REGULATED CONSTRUCT called the WWW (666?) "clean"?
** NOTICE: This post generated via US CORP APPROVED ISP **
I have repeatedly stated in the past that the Internet is God's tool to spread his truth and bring down the wall of ha Shatan's lies. This has come to me by the Spirit and by observation of how many times the spread of information via Internet has thwarted the US government's attempts to squelch freedom.
Batkol you claimed that the Internet is the Beast's jurisdiction. There is no evidence to support this. The Internet is a Spirit realm, of electricity, bytes, data, electrons, and does not exist as an ownable concept.
I can set up a DNS and name registration server on a private wireless network with no connection to the main Internet. Then I can let others in the neighborhood use my DNS server to resolve each other's network addresses as "www." addresses, letting them on my private network in no way connected to the Internet. I can host a website on one computer with the domain, www.god.com, and since everyone on my network is using my DNS server, when they browse, their computer will look for www.god.com on my network. Clearly the address is independent of the other outside Internet. The www. in addresses is irrelevant. There are over a hundred countries with their own Internets, and all Internets meet at certain points. The USDOD does not control these 100-plus Internets that comprise the world-wide-web.
You claimed that [WWW. == 666]. But this is not correct. That is not how numbers work in Hebrew. In Hebrew each subsequent number is added to the previous, like with Roman Numerals, so:
vav + vav + vav = W + W + W = 6 + 6 + 6 = 18. Eighteen is the Hebrew number for life! Gematriacly, the www. in the Internet domain names stands for life, not the beast.
-- Berkano |
|
|
|
True North
Advanced Member
USA
163 Posts |
Posted - 13 Apr 2004 : 21:27:39
|
David Merrill
Maybe a scenario to help the understanding of process ...?
Supposing a licensed professional comes to enlightenment of who he is and a complaint is filed with a tribunal (board of overseers of the profession) and the professional is commanded by the tribunal (through the mail) to quit doing something he has done.
The licensed professional then has a series of registered mail back and forth between the tribunal and said licensed professional to the extent of demanding due process and requiring the tribunal to state their jurisdiction in writing to him.
The tribunal will not state their jurisdiction and the same registered mail goes back and forth between the tribunal's lawyer and the licensed professional with the same results (no statement of jurisdiction) but a statement that the license makes the the licensed professional subject.
The licensed professional then sends a letter to the tribunal rescinding said license which the tribunal ignores and sends the now unlicensed (by way of rescission) professional registered mail which he simply refuses at the mailbox.
The tribunal holds their inquest which the professional does not know about (but the professional assumed notification of a tribunal hearing was the registered mail he refused at the box) and the tribunal finds the professional not guilty of wrong doing notifying the professional of the same by yet another registered mail and regular mail.
Would the professional use this opportunity to refuse for cause the tribunal's registered mail as an opportunity for his beginning of process? or was the opportunity at the outset of the first letter of demand by the tribunal?
The above is a bit muddy but any theoretical observations?
TN |
|
|
|
David Merrill
Advanced Member
USA
1147 Posts |
Posted - 24 Apr 2004 : 19:38:24
|
Dear True North;
A few months ago I was shock testing here. I wanted a feel about the fringe of Christianity that disagrees with Paul's doctrine of Romans 13. While here though, two "suitors" contacted me and neither has become a court of competent jurisdiction. Without publishing a true judgment, they keep in the academic realm of "hearer", trying to understand before they will "do" and become what they wish to be.
The theoretical observations about the above are on the notice only. If somebody has a license to say, practice medicine then there is a board overseeing things. Suppose the IRS is making a claim by notice of amount due and this develops into a Notice of Lien. Now suppose there is an agent (unpaid) on the board; this is more accurately an insurance adjuster. This person on the board is protecting debt based currency because it is a verb and has no stabilizing foundation but confidence in it. Federal Reserve Notes are insurance policies; promises to pay upon resolution of the national debt, and an insurance adjuster always sways a claim toward the principal, here the IMF/UN. So notice is given that the IRS claim is somehow going to be read into the licensing requirements albeit how a physician meets his financial obligations is in no way related to how well he heals people.
The notice must be refused for cause timely in order for the novation, or new contract terms to be defeated. But be warned, this usually leads to more notices as the attorneys try to get past the mailbox, etc. But the process of international law is much broader if you just stick to process.
Regards,
David Merrill.
|
|
|
|
BatKol
Advanced Member
USA
735 Posts |
Posted - 24 Apr 2004 : 22:18:30
|
Berkano said: Batkol you claimed that the Internet is the Beast's jurisdiction. There is no evidence to support this. The Internet is a Spirit realm, of electricity, bytes, data, electrons, and does not exist as an ownable concept.
Batkol: The information is not owned but it is subject to regulation if the information is considered "illegal". From "terrorism" to porn and everything inbetween. Check out the FCC's or other FRANCHISE'S involvement. "Bondservants" are not going out and busting child porn promoters on the internet, it's the Beast.
Berkano: I can set up a DNS and name registration server on a private wireless network with no connection to the main Internet...... There are over a hundred countries with their own Internets, and all Internets meet at certain points. The USDOD does not control these 100-plus Internets that comprise the world-wide-web.
Batkol: What kind of private contract would you have to sign to do this? Then, once you are contractually linked to the "private wireless network", you might want to consider what contracts THEY have signed since you would be yoked to them. The USDOD does not have to regulate every ZONE... other various FRANCHISES can handle that. It's ultimately the same THING.
Berkano: You claimed that [WWW. == 666]. But this is not correct. That is not how numbers work in Hebrew. In Hebrew each subsequent number is added to the previous, like with Roman Numerals, so:
vav + vav + vav = W + W + W = 6 + 6 + 6 = 18. Eighteen is the Hebrew number for life! Gematriacly, the www. in the Internet domain names stands for life, not the beast.
Batkol: You added the plus signs not me. If I have learned anything from communicating on this forum is to watch "the additives".
--- Batkol
|
Edited by - BatKol on 25 Apr 2004 08:30:36 |
|
|
|
David Merrill
Advanced Member
USA
1147 Posts |
Posted - 26 Apr 2004 : 15:22:24
|
I find the comment about 666 being 216 very informative. It means that number is 6x6x6. This corresponds with the 216 fold Name of God also. See Pi; Faith in Chaos by Darren Aronofsky. But you can get the 72 three-letter Angelic names from Exodus 3:19-21 I believe. You have to look at a Hebrew Pentateuch to see the three verses are each 72 letters long.
But the WWW being 666 is likely from Shaysh being the Hebrew word for "six". WW is thus Six. the second is the second and third WW and the third is the first and third WW. This is comfortable Gematria to look at the first and last letter too.
Regards,
David Merrill.
|
|
|
|
Robert-James
Advanced Member
uSA
353 Posts |
Posted - 26 Apr 2004 : 21:42:35
|
My goodness, have we fallen into a talMUDic trap? Wanna count 72? Count the stone's on the Giza pyramid on the dollar. The seventy two names of shem-ham-foresch, is pure talmudic goblygok.
But why would a modern day Pythagorian, put 72 blocks of stone on the obverse seal of the united States?
Well, it seems to the man, that there are two completely opposed systems of thought...throught out scripture. Shem vs. Cain. Two seed lines, as promised. Seed= DNA.
If ye were of the evil seed, how long would it take you to think...'we must take over the Christian Church'? About two hours. This happened many hundreds of years ago.
It is not over...till We win.
It is not over... till We win.
It is not over...till We win.
Israel was over six million people in David's countings, in 1020 b.c. 42,600 of Judah/Benyamin returned in 520 b.c. What happened to the million's of the ten tribes, plus Judah/Benyamin who joined unto the Israelite's? Who populated Europe? Who were the Phoenician's? {phoenicians are Israelites, acting as Cainanites}. Who is so blind...as My servants?
Then again, my problem is that I talk with folks that are completely scripturally illiterate.
I might as well ask who won the latest NASCAR race {Jeff Gordon}.
What is a suitor? A man, "hat in hand", asking for the hand of the Bride, and he asks the Father of the Bride.
What is Beluah Land? What is an Am-Eri-Can? Where are the Thirteen tribes gathered together?
Stupid is...as stupid does. |
|
|
|
David Merrill
Advanced Member
USA
1147 Posts |
Posted - 01 May 2004 : 15:10:40
|
I apologize for not reading the last message in any context before I commented about Gematria. I figured whoever wrote that last message was on the topic of discussion. Maybe that was somebody from Mathematics Worth Pondering who had been waiting to say something to me?
About suitors,you got that right. That is why you adopt a father (family)-in-law after being the suitor. The suiting is done in-law. It is all about commercial intercourse. Marriage licenses are technically applying to the local priesthood (State) to intermarry thus international commerce (admiralty). However you are not speaking in the scope of suitors "...saving to suitors, in all cases the right..." of 1789.
Another timeline (that compliments the detailed one already shown to you) shows the Khazarian/Ashkenazim (Hungarian Jew/Thirteenth tribe) adopted Judaism in 740 AD [The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler] and that this is exactly 1260 years after Darius displaced the Ten Northern Tribes with the Scythians (Assyrians) in 520/519 BC [The World of the Scythians by Rene Rolle]. Many obviously settled in the Caucusus Mountains between the Caspian and Black Seas. Then another 1260 years, a half "week" is 2000 AD when Ariel Sharon climbed the Temple Mount and began the current hostilities afresh. The violence cancelled Tabernacles (Matthew 24:15).
So far as the Great Seal goes, pure paranoia. By any definition you will probably read "...always defended strongly by the patient..." so I really will not waste my breath trying to cure you. I have read the pamphlet down at the federal repository titled The Great Seal of the United States and if you think I would adopt your notions over the facts, wake up. Get well soon.
I would not defend the Talmud for a second. But relationship begins with identity and that is where most people are hurting. It is not how hard we pray, but how well we pray. After tweaking the Table of Relative Weights for optimum resonance I was not surprised to find the transition over whole numbers fell at Germanium 72. It is really quite useful in forcasting. Yesterday I walked into the clerk's office and found the Affidavit of Mailing on the bill of exchange/fidelity bond on the computer screen - before I walked in. Of millions of pages, that one had been called up. Cicilia was a little confused when I ordered three certified copies of what was already on the screen and then three certified copies of the bill which carried my signature. I think it was the first time somebody was after what was already on her computer screen.
Regards,
David Merrill.
|
Edited by - David Merrill on 01 May 2004 18:56:26 |
|
|
|
Oneisraelite
Advanced Member
uSA
833 Posts |
Posted - 02 May 2004 : 04:49:36
|
Greetings brethren, in the name of the King:
Peace be unto the house.
brother Robert-James said: "Well, it seems to the man, that there are two completely opposed systems of thought...throught out scripture."
Man, oh man, did you say a mouthful, or what?
Example: After pages and pages and pages regarding sacrifices [slaughterings] and burn offerings we read something like this:
For thou desirest not sacrifice; else would I give it: thou delightest not in burnt offering. The sacrifices of Yahuwah are a broken spirit: a broken and a contrite heart, O Yahuwah, thou wilt not despise.
fellowcitizen of the commonwealth of Yisra'el, NOT the STATE OF ISRAEL. |
|
|
|
David Merrill
Advanced Member
USA
1147 Posts |
Posted - 02 May 2004 : 05:42:22
|
Good point.
Opposed to the commonwealth is the U.N. organ formed in 1947 by the Palestine Partition. A wonderful example of dichotomy. At least that is the point I get from your message; division.
Regards,
David Merrill.
|
|
|
|
BatKol
Advanced Member
USA
735 Posts |
Posted - 02 May 2004 : 11:46:14
|
brother Robert said: Example: After pages and pages and pages regarding sacrifices [slaughterings] and burn offerings we read something like this:
For thou desirest not sacrifice; else would I give it: thou delightest not in burnt offering. The sacrifices of Yahuwah are a broken spirit: a broken and a contrite heart, O Yahuwah, thou wilt not despise.
Steve: Yes. I ask then, where is the blood!? All that is required is a broken Spirit and a contrite heart. |
|
|
|
Robert-James
Advanced Member
uSA
353 Posts |
Posted - 02 May 2004 : 21:53:24
|
But David,
commercial intercorse, with, or without protection, is still intercourse with the whore and her banker's.
A hard saying: ye will either serve The Most High, or, mammon. This is why the glad tidings have always appealed to the downtrodden, as does scripture economic Law. No usury. Give back, at the end of seven, totally at the fifty year mark. And is why He stated that a rich man is 'almost' without a chance.Yahushuah proclaimed the jubilee for the captive "soul's"...not for the Nation-Commonwealth of Israel. He does not reckon Israel...among the nations. The East India Company knew this, and had a field day, at commerce.
To do this Patterson, the Scottish banker, took the Sceptre and Crown, and Globe, from the Royal's, who had it by annointing from the Pope, via king John, circa 1213.
An old saying: if ya don't have it, ya can't give it.
Certain men of the Mother lodge, well, never mind...
I coulda sworn that the sacrifice's of the old testament, were symbolic, of our beast nature! The ego, and HIS WILL be done, in the EARTH. [earth= ha Adam}
And Abel's sacrifice, a lamb, of the flock, spoke of much better thing's than Cain's sacrifice...of work's. Salvation, of the soul, is a free gift, it can never be earned, else, the EGO, would brag into his empty eternity. Now, that would be a real hell.
You may be right Steven...if "they had only listened to My Voice", YHWH said to Moses. But THEY did not. So step two come's forth. Mosess' law is full of blood, and sacrifice. Symbolism's.
He veiled the Plan, for THEY were not ready as a people, though He went ahead and married them anyWay.
Then Paul or whoever penned Hebrews, stated that for us to neglect such a great salvation as Yahushuah's laying down His Life, and count it as nothing. Well then, ahem, there is no hope, for them...in this age. They were the one's, not chosen unto salvation. Maybe better put, not Firstfruits.
I appreciate the understanding of not requireing bloody sacrifice's. But, and, I have seen many women give birth, and it is a bloody mess! To give Birth. And many risk their lives, in the natural, to bring forth the next generation.
Oh, for the symbolism's to come alive for us.
And they made their robes white...in the Blood of the Lamb.
Either this is a madman's insanity, or it hints of Spiritual Truth, not discerned by the natural mind.
"Savings to Suitor's"...
He must first marry the Bride in order to conceive with her, and bring forth New Life. A New Order.
If we can't connect the dot's, we will never see the picture. THEY created the matrix,[U.S][US] womb, from whence the son's shall be brought forth.
Then again, I see the face of The YHWH-IOUA, in the face of Yahushuah. Other men, see Yoseph/Miriam's boy.
American's have a Destiny to finish...The Work.
Let Us be about Our Father's 'business'.
Many, many, men/women, have sacrificed their blood to the advancement of the cause. Precious in the sight of Yahuweh, is the blood of His saint's. Saints= blood offspring. A thousand-hundred son's/daughter's, have been strengthened by the sacrifice of Yahushuah...in their time of testing. Never, never, take that away from them. Nor could you/we. They paid the price for Kingdom Building.
Am-Eriy-Can...My People...eye's opened...officiating as priests.[STRONGS CONCORDANCE...#5971-6179-3547]
As priests, as We have a High Priest, sitted on the Right Hand of the Creator of the Universe.
Eye's opened, though the Light be so Bright. [and who really want's to awake from their slumber?]
Officiating as priests....takes that CIVIL DEATH. [sacrifice MY WILL]
I know of many American's who have no connection with the beast system, through contracts. A child will understand this, before long.
Courage is to "do" what you are afraid of doing. Love is the Force, that will see you through. No greater Love has a man but this...to lay down his life {blood} for his brethern.
Yahshua was told three times before entering into the Promised state: "be of good courage". [but I am afraid....good, you should be}
American's are living a dream. Yoseph was called a dreamer. The hell Yoseph had to go through, to acquire the reality of his dream! And at the end, he saved the family of Israel, and was not, not, ever to with-hold forgiveness to his brethern. For The YHWH had choosen Yoseph to suffer this fate, in order that The IOUA would make sure His Promise to Yacob/Israel, that Israel would never suffer lack with food and shelter. For Yacob said, "if ye provide shelter and clothing, I Will make ye My elohim". Father keeps His promises.
And a promise He made to Abraham...is unconditional. Check it out. And surely, We know that the Edomite's/Khazar's, have no inheritance in Our promise. Well, then again, if THEY bow at Your Feet, then, ye shall discern. Think Isralei's Sharon will bow?
Luke 19:27.
Steven, Father's Plan, before the age began, was to sacrifice His Firstborn Son. And every Firstborn son will do just that.
He who seeks to save his life shall lose it. It is all written in black and white. William Blake stated to the blinded English countrymen: you see black where I see white. Your heaven is my hell, and my heaven is your hell.
JESUITS HAVE A SAYING; BLACK IS WHITE. They be Cain's offspring...today. They have an office to fulfill. And, they are sweating blood, in that someone's have seen through the veil. A whole bunch of One's.
A man with a broken/contrite heart, is a precious vessel of honor, indeed. He would be able to give up the most precious thing's he has, for the Kingdom's sake. I knew a man once, who gave up a wife, and the most lovely family ever given. Why would he do such a thing?
|
|
|
|
BatKol
Advanced Member
USA
735 Posts |
Posted - 02 May 2004 : 23:09:55
|
Robert-James said: I knew a man once, who gave up a wife, and the most lovely family ever given. Why would he do such a thing?
Steve: I know a man who continually bad mouthed his faithful wife and cast such a dark shadow over his house-hold to the point that his family had to escape the prison or be sucked spirtually dry. His family and friends tried to bring it to his attention but he was too far gone on a self-appointed priest ego trip to see the reality of the situation. Very sad. The irony of our two stories is the man I speak of is probably asking himself the same question that the man you speak of asks himself: Why would he do such a thing?
BTW, I respect that YHWH has shown you the connections and concepts above. However, you might want to also ponder the concept that YHWH has shown different folks different things and that, in time, YHWH's good pleasure will ultimately be done. So be it. |
Edited by - BatKol on 03 May 2004 08:36:13 |
|
|
|
David Merrill
Advanced Member
USA
1147 Posts |
Posted - 03 May 2004 : 08:46:51
|
I hope I can do those Replies justice. I suppose some of the things I say, that do not match up well with my current dictionary of linguistic symbols get passed by too.
So I try to get the gist - commercial and sexual congress are equated. But I live by the ideals you speak of. At least for now, I have no DOB, bank account, SSN etc. The people who become suitors, who are proven courts of competent jurisdiction need energy to survive and the only honest method is intercourse [locally "trade" but who is local anymore? (county fairs)]. We all hire the butcher and farmer to be the violent ones (unless you are a butcher or farmer, I don't know).
So these courts of competent jurisdiction get control of the mailbox and let's say, stop getting forced to their knees before nuisance and often nightmare suits. After a few months of this, their friends notice the change and pry my name out of them. I have never advertised. Often quite the opposite when I feared one suitor would tell two and thus a mathematical anxiety of having to change email addresses and phone numbers. Thing is, most people cannot just say, "Give me $500 cash, no receipt. Your case and default judgment is your receipt. My signature is all over it. When you figure out how bad I ripped you off, you will give me a big hug and tell your friends too."
I am not religious so the symbol "worshipping mammon", like Matthew 6:24 means something different to you than me. For now I enjoy telling the cop I have no information - I have no DOB. Without the Strawman bond there is no jurisdiction - territorial, subject matter or in personam. Isn't that what property rights are about? I am in control of what I have; not the policeman? So far as birth certificate, I honestly do not have one.
But the potential suitors that took the trouble to get in contact with me from the ecclesia.org site turned out to be academicians; researchers. They paid, best guess to figure out why the papers work. I told them the papers do not work - they lead the man or woman through a paradigm shift about commerce and contract responsibility. It seems to work well enough that when a man can honestly prove he is a court of competent jurisdiction in lieu of the bankrupt courts of the United States and the subsequent bereft States, others want what he has.
Maybe what he has is the ability to function on his feet; without being forced to his knees (debt action in assumpsit) - regardless of the God (or gods) he worships.
Regards,
David Merrill.
|
|
|
|
Lewish
Advanced Member
uSA
496 Posts |
Posted - 05 May 2004 : 12:13:30
|
Hello all,
The book David has referred to in past posts as "The Lamb to the Slaughter" is actually titled "Are you lost at 'C'". The title of the first chapter is "The Lamb to the Slaughter". I highly recommend suitors get a copy if you want to understand more of what more of this subject.
Regards,
Lewis |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
|
|
"saving to suitors" clause of 1789
Topic Locked
