| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
David Merrill
Advanced Member
USA
1147 Posts |
 Posted - 03 Jun 2005 : 10:36:35
|
I believe this is an optimistic way to view the future of America. Capital integration will have a wonderful impact on the banking empire in the next few years. The road may get a little rocky but if we prepare ourselves with proper education about identity, things may not get so rough.
This post is an answer to a private email. I decided it is edifying enough not to change the form. So I have changed the name of the member who wrote me and not indicate who he or she is in any subsequent posts.
quote:
Originally Posted by Handle
David,
Could you show me (in from state) how to "replace" my birth certifcate with something that is'nt "incorpated"? I really don't like the courts on me.
Thanks,
First Last
Understand the birth certificate. There is no other option than incorporation. But you have the option of ownership of the created corporation.
http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_certification.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_certification2.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_certification3.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_certification4.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_certification5.jpg
Registration as chattel by Birth Certificate
Use this birth certificate as a template. It is not my birth certificate. My name is David Merrill. Like my father's name is Philip Jansen and my mother, Louanne. They (parents, hospital) have been strongly suggesting you put your first, middle and last name together to form your name. When you put your family or surname on your name you have formed a new entity - legal name.
http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_NameDefinition.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_Name_legal,jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_Bible_family.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_Name_Bible_Dictionary.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_Name_common_law.jpg
on names
Changing your true name to a legal name made your name colorable (changeable) and you may need to do things like that in commerce. I suggest you would sign in the form "David Merrill dba DAVID MERRILL VAN PELT" for a driver license. Or "First Middle dba First M. Last" on contracts. "Dba" is "doing business as". When you get control of your identity (capital integration) you should be able to explain it so plainly the other party it will be comfortable - "My name is First Middle and Last is my family or surname. Putting them together makes a new legal name."
Now emerges the man in control of the commercial fictional entity. A project some suitors are doing is signing endorsement on checks with a self-inking stamp:
"DEPOSITED FOR CREDIT ON ACCOUNT OR EXCHANGED FOR NON-NEGOTIABLE FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES OF FACE VALUE."
Now the event has become non-taxable. You did not endorse debt currency as though it were money. If you cash the check, instead of drawing it out of account later, you are already stating that for the non-colorable entity, the FRNs are non-negotiable instruments. You are not coloring money.
Furthermore I would sign endorsement the way I have suggested above. If you are dealing direct deposit (electronic funds etc.) then make the adjustment on your signature card. That is the declaration of the form of the authorizing signature.
Another thing to get control of your contracts is that there is likely a 50 to 100 page contract going with your bank. It is supposed to be available in the lobby for inspection. Ask for this contract or tariff. Look through it and examine the terms carefully. You (either party) may make alterations. If you alter it and they do not complain or tell you not to bank there anymore, they accept the alterations. You want to strike through any agreement you made to give your funds to any third parties short of a bona fide court order. This will make it illegal to turn funds over to the IRS on a Notice of Levy or Lien.
Being a court of competent jurisdiction means capital integration of your identity complimented with carefully examining your contract affairs and refusing for cause contract offers that you do not like. The man or woman has that right of avoidance and refusal. Not so for any secondary persons or legal fictions.
Afterthought:
http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_NameDefinition.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_Name_legal,jpg
These definitions from Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition are Key. Usually in a dictionary when the word being defined is being used italics are utilized. But this is a law dictionary. Not only that, it has been described as the "Crown's UCC law dictionary" by Reverend Stranding. On his video he shows the heirarchy of the British Crown in the back of his hardcover; I have a paperback without that though. But it is for attorneys (esquires). So that is the scope of the dictionary. [It is funny that the bookstore owner was retiscent to sell it to me (c 1994). One of those nagging thoughts that haunts me. His job is selling books but I had to convince him I would not misuse my copy of Black's Fifth. Richard McDonald despises that particular law dictionary. I have heard that when somebody refers to it he pretends they are talking about a fifth of Jack Daniel's "Black Label".]
Now try to follow this if you want the Key to capital integration [for your head to become one (in identity; to reverse the dichotomy your parents and society have inflicted upon you)]. When we use foreign words like de jure we have a choice, to put those words in italics or parenthesis, "de jure". Since "name" in the definition explanation is both the word being defined and is foreign to the scope of the dictionary the editors put it in "quotation" marks both times they used it.
Notice that "name" to attorneys is the Christian or given name and the family or surname. To them legal name is name. To attorneys, to attorn you, they have legal name in mind. To them legal name is your name.
quote:
ATTORN. To turn. In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer homage and service from one lord to another. This is the act of feudatories, vassals, or tenants, upon the alienation of the estate. (emphasis added) 1827 Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary
Within the dichotomy it is Biblical that you become the vassal. The foreigner and stranger - "feign self to be another" - equivalently handing sovereign soil won by Revolution back to the Crown. If you do not know your name you become subject by natural law expressed in the Holy Bible to both usury and exemption from forgiveness of debt. See Deuteronomy 15:1-3 and 23:20. You will find "feign self to be another" in the Hebrew word for "foreigner" and "stranger", nakar. [You Christians getting excited about that; note I said 'natural law expressed in the Holy Bible', not Christian Common Law (an oxymoron to privatize common law). Abram/Abraham brought the natural law (first codified by Hammurabi) along with monotheism out of Ur, Chaldea/Babylon.]
If you have followed the counterclaim in admiralty Libel of Review then you would find a key document is a certificate of search by the US Courthouse clerk that all the foreign agents have failed to file and win judgment in the district courts of the United States. The Denver clerk started going a little astray and demanding a "last name".
http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_certificate_falsified.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_certificate_corrected.jpg
certificates of search from the district court
I wrote to Congress, the Speaker and tendered a $350 money order with my complaint, giving James R. Manspeaker 30 days to tell Congress why he felt justified in such falsification of court documents. That corrected the problem but it is easier to give the defendant the clerk's number so they can check for themselves. It turned out to be a blessing in disguise.
William Thornton, an associate of Richard McDonald www.1215.org talks about the same thing from a sovereign perspective.
http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_William_Thornton.wmv
clip about private attorney
Turn to "Legal name" in the same law dictionary and you will see that in the common law, that is the same definition for "name".
This might be a mindbender for a lot of you. But I assure you I am doing the best I can not to toy with you about this.
Regards,
David Merrill.
|
Edited by - David Merrill on 04 Jun 2005 05:51:57 |
|
|
Manuel
Advanced Member
USA
762 Posts |
Posted - 03 Jun 2005 : 22:04:38
|
Thank you David Merrill, certainly revealing.
The part about the attorney-like similar tastes and hang-overs with the Jack Daniels "Black Label," is clear :)
Hey, you think that our similar ages and month being born has something to do with our likeness? Naaaa.....
I am,
Manuel |
 |
|
|
Mark
Senior Member
USA
55 Posts |
Posted - 03 Jun 2005 : 23:54:54
|
Yes, it all makes my head ache  , though not the part about name vs Legal-name, just everything else.
Peace, Mark |
Edited by - Mark on 04 Jun 2005 00:02:28 |
|
|
|
David Merrill
Advanced Member
USA
1147 Posts |
Posted - 04 Jun 2005 : 05:56:31
|
Manuel; That is not my birth certificate. Albeit we may be the same age. Leo sun, Leo moon, maybe we are zodialogical twins.
Regards,
David Merrill. |
|
|
|
Manuel
Advanced Member
USA
762 Posts |
Posted - 04 Jun 2005 : 16:47:12
|
Either way David Merrill, thanks again. Leo's rule under God!
Everytime a movie starts with the lion roaring, I tell others:
"Hey... I've seen that movie already!"
I am,
Manuel |
|
|
|
HenryBowman
Regular Member
USA
33 Posts |
Posted - 09 Jun 2005 : 17:11:33
|
quote:
Originally posted by David Merrill
William Thornton, an associate of Richard McDonald www.1215.org talks about the same thing from a sovereign perspective.
http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_William_Thornton.wmv
clip about private attorney
I found most interesting that this William Thornton seems to be saying that we can "be" the "Court"
More! More! I want more!
Thanks
HB
ATFOTRAF |
|
|
|
David Merrill
Advanced Member
USA
1147 Posts |
Posted - 09 Jun 2005 : 18:54:20
|
Indeed there is one suitor who will contend with "judge" Figa in the US district courts about his orders coram vobis [writ of error from our court to yours]. The result will probably be an order for contempt from the sovereign's court.
But then again he will accompany three other suitors to the Provost Marshal before that happens. War and Emergency Powers. I am an intelligence nexus betweem some 100 sensory nodes. Cool! So I get the testimony first hand.
Regards,
David Merrill. |
Edited by - David Merrill on 09 Jun 2005 18:57:25 |
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
|
|
No. Thank you.
