Posted - 18 Sep 2003 : 22:22:42
| I offer the following to those of you who keep intermingling the word "jew", with Hebrew and/or Israelite, as if "jew" is synonymous with Hebrew/Israelite/Judahite.
Such is not the case. The brainwashing is so complete, due to media
propaganda, that most won't believe it, even when it come straight
from the HORSES' mouths.
Also, the word "jew" DOES NOT APPEAR in the Bible until II Kings 16:6, some 1500 years after Abram, whom so many liars are wont to call a "jew", along with the 12 desciples, and Jesus.
Under the heading of "A brief History of the Terms for Jew" , in the 1980 Jewish Almanac is the following:
"Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an Ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew." (1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3).
" We Jews have spoiled the blood of all races; We have
tarnished and broken their power; we have made everything foul,
rotten, decomposed and decayed." (The Way to Zion, by Munzer)
They have always claimed they are not a race!
[ When that is expedient for them, some of them do ........ -- James ] Well, read what they themselves have written in their own encyclopaedia.
THEY DO NOT BELONG TO THE WHITE RACE!
The Jews admit they are not even Whites! See what they have written about themselves:
Report from: The Jewish Post & Opinion
Friday, June 28, 1968
Jews Are Not Whites, Professor Tells Rabbis
BOSTON- A political scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who has been speaking to a Jewish convention over the past few months, told the Reform Rabbis meeting here that Jews are not white. Speaking on the Jewish academician, Prof. Leonard J. Fein, explained that "we are not white symbolically, and we are not white literally". He then added that we should "not permit ourselves to be lumped together with white America, for that is not where we belong."CONTINUING, he explained that "We are too much an oppressed people, still, and too much a rejected people, even in this country, to accept the designation 'white.'. and to count ourselves as white, moreover, Is to deny our brotherhood with the Yernenites (Yemenites ?) and the Kurdistanis in Israel, with the B'nei Yisrael from India and the Black Jews of New York."
[If the "jews" are a race, how can there be black, yellow, whites and
admixtures who claim to be "jews" ??? What about the black Falasha "jews" of Ethiopia? -- James ]
Employing a theme which he used in addressing other Jewish convention, Dr. Fein asserted that Jews are not black, "We are Jews", he went on. "and because we are Jews, and not white,
and not black, we must see to it, as a community, that we do not come to act as whites, whether by choice or because others so identify us. Not only because it is forbidden us, not only because we of all people ought to know better, but because we shall cut ourselves off from our own future if we do." He then went on to relate this view to the Negro. "And because we are Jews, it seems to me that we are entitled to insist that there be a special relationship between us and Negroes; a relationship based not upon a common enemy, not upon a common history, but instead upon a common purpose of teaching America at long last what pluralism is all about." [ Yes mr. "jew"; it is about Genocide of the WHITE RACE. Elanor - The Red - Roosevelt, stated that she yearned
" for the day when there will only be a BROWN RACE on earth." --- James ]
Now since we have the above confession from the impostor's mouth
[ Revelation 2:9 & 3:9 ], that "jews" are NOT WHITE, let us see
from a few BIBLE VERSES, what color the Hebrew/Israelite people are.
1Sam 16:12 And he sent, and brought him in. Now he was ruddy, and withal of a beautiful countenance, and goodly to look to. And the LORD said, Arise, anoint him: for this is he.
ruddy (rude) -dier, -diest
1 having a healthy red color [a ruddy complexion]
2 red or reddish
3 [Brit., etc. Colloq.] confounded: an intensive: also used adverbially [euphemism for bloody]
[ME rudi < OE rudig < rudu, red: see rudd]
(C)1995 Zane Publishing, Inc. (C)1994, 1991, 1988 Simon & Schuster, Inc.
1Sam 17:42 And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and ruddy, and of a fair countenance.
Song 5:10 My beloved is white and ruddy, the chiefest among ten thousand.
[ Oh gee guys; there it is ..... RIGHT THERE IN THE Bible;
My beloved is WHITE ........
you DO believe the Bible, DON'T YOU??????? -- James ]
Lam 4:7 Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies, their polishing was of sapphire:
[ Ruddy means that one able to SHOW BLOOD IN THE FACE ! You
BLUSH; BLOOD rushes to yer FACE AND EARS ........
Adam, Hebrew word # 120 means: man; human being
DERIVED FROM Hebrew # 119, 'adam which means:
RUDDY of Nazarites.
To CAUSE TO SHOW RED (sounds like BLUSHING to me) -- James ]
Also, we have the little matter of Rebbekah's brother Laban. Laban is Hebrew # 3837 which means .......... gasp .........
WHITE ! ( same as Hebrew # 3836 which means WHITE, which is derived from Hebrew # 3835 which means " TO BE WHITE". Which means that Rebbekah and Laban's PARENTS were WHITE HEBREWS, just like Adam, Abram, Isaac, Jacob and the TWELVE PATRIARCHS
who became known as ISRAELITES, NOT "jews", BECAUSE Jacob's name was
changed to ................gasp .............. there it is; right there in the Bible ............... ISRAEL. Notice his name was NOT changed to "jew", but rather, Israel.
READ IT AGAIN.
Under the heading of "A brief History of the Terms for Jew" , in the 1980 Jewish Almanac is the following:
"Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an Ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew." (1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3).
In Revelation 2:9 & 3:9, Jesus said it is BLASPHEMY for someone to call themselves a "jew" - the original was Son of Judah - when they are not, but ARE of the SYNAGOGUE of SATAN!
The late Louis D. Brandeis (another Jewish traitor), long a Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, in his book, "The Jewish Problem-How To Solve It." wrote:
"Let us recognize that we Jews are a distinct nationality of which every Jew, whatever his country, his nation or shade of belief, is necessarily a member...Organize, Organize, Organize, until every Jew in America must stand up and be counted, or prove himself wittingly or unwittingly of the few who are against their own people."
By this statement [jew]Justice Brandeis really claimed dual citizenship for all Jews, and certainly degenerated to appeals to Jewish exclusiveness and nationalistic pride and loyalty.
[ From: Origin of the Jews by Willie Martin ]
The First Jews
First let us make it abundantly clear that there were no Jews prior to the 1700s, for the letter "J" had not been invented prior to that time. "J: This letter has been added to the English Alphabet in modern days; the letter I being written formerly in words where J is now used. It seems to have had the sound of y, in many words, as it still has in the German. The English sound of this letter may be expressed by dsh, or edth. A compound sound coinciding exactly with of g, in genius; the French , with the articulation d preceding it. It is the tenth letter of the English Alphabet. (Noah Webster's First Edition of an American Dictionary of the English Language 1828 Edition)
"Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created. And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth."
Please note that neither Cain nor Able is mentioned in Adam's line. Therefore, we can conclude from this that neither Cain nor Able were Adam's children. For if they had (been) God certainly would have instructed that they be noted as such.
False Doctrine Placed in the Scriptures By Kenite Scribes
In the Books of The Chronicles we find recorded there the names and the genealogies of the Tribes of Israel and where their portions of the inheritance is listed.
"These were the sons of Caleb the son of Hur, the firstborn of Ephratah; Shobal the father of Kirjath-jearim, Salma the father of Bethlehem, Hareph the father of Beth-gader. And Shobal the father of Kirjath-jearim had sons; Haroeh, and half of the Manahethites. And the families of Kirjath-jearim; the Ithrites, and the Puhites, and the Shumathites, and the Mishraites; of them came the Zareathites, and the Eshtaulites. The sons of Salma; Bethlehem, and the Netophathites, Ataroth, the house of Joab, and half of the Manahethites, the Zorites. ‘AND' THE FAMILIES OF THE SCRIBES which dwelt at Jabez; the Tirathites, the Shimeathites, and Suchathites. THESE ARE THE KENITES that came of Hemath, the father of the house of Rechab." (1 Chronicles 2:50-55)
Other genealogies in the Bible go into great detail and never leaves out a son! (Especially a firstborn son) If one reads Genesis 4:1 correctly, as depicted, it is not there either. Why is Cain totally left out?? Cain's descendants are mentioned separately in Genesis 4:17-24 and it doesn't list Adam as the father of Cain! WHY???
The next place we find Cain in the Scriptures is Genesis 15:19 and we will have to read verses 18 through 21:
"In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates: The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites, And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims, And the Ammonites, and the Canaanites, and the Girga****es, and the Jebusites." (Genesis 15:18-21) (KJV)
One of these nations among the Canaanites was the KENITES (#7017 Strong's) which were DESCENDANTS OF CAIN. Being that Cain was of the SATANIC SEEDLINE, he would infect his satanic blood AMONG ALL THESE TEN NATIONS.
And the "Kenizzites" were Edomites.
In the Peake's Commentary on the bible, page 116 we find this about this mixed group of nations spoken of in Genesis 15:19-21:
"When the Israelites entered Canaan they found there a VERY MIXED population generally designated by the term Amorite or Canaanite."
The Adam Clarke's Commentary on the Bible, Abridged by Ralph Earle, page 38, says: "The Kenites. Here are ten nations mentioned, though afterwards reckoned but seven; see Deuteronomy 7:1; Acts 13:19. Probably some of them which existed in Abram's time had been BLENDED with others before the time of Moses, so that seven only out of the ten then remained."
Kenites: "[KEE nights] (metalsmiths)-- the name of a wandering tribe of people who were associated with the Midianites (Judges 1:16) and, later, with the Amalekites (1 Samuel 15:6). The Kenites lived in the desert regions of Sinai, Midian, Edom, Amalek, and the Negev. The Bible first mentions the Kenites as one of the groups that lived in Canaan during the time of Abraham (Genesis 15:19); their territory was to be taken by the Israelites (Numbers 24:21-22). The Kenites were metal craftsmen who may have traced their ancestry to TUBAL-CAIN (a descendant of Cain) (Genesis 4:22). (from Nelson's Illustrated Bible Dictionary) (Copyright (C) 1986, Thomas Nelson Publishers)
The Wycliff Bible Commentary, editors: Charles F. Pfeiffer & Everett F. Harrison has this to say on page 8, and this quote will cover Genesis 3:14-15: "CURSED (arűr) ART THOU. The Lord singled out the originator and instigator of the temptation for special condemnation and degradation. From that moment he must crawl in the dust and even feed on it. He would slither his way along in disgrace, and hatred would be directed against him from all directions. Man would always regard him as a symbol of the degradation of the one who slandered God (cf. Isaiah 65:25).
HE WAS TO REPRESENT NOT MERELY THE SERPENT RACE, BUT THE POWER OF THE EVIL KINGDOM.
As long as life continued, men would hate him and seek to destroy him. I WILL PUT ENMITY. The word "ębâ" denotes the blood-feud that runs deepest in the heart of man (cf. Numbers 35:19-20; Ezekiel 25:15-17; 35:5-6) THOU SHALT BRUISE (shűp).
A PROPHECY OF CONTINUING STRUGGLE BETWEEN THE DESCENDANTS OF WOMAN AND OF THE SERPENT TO DESTROY EACH OTHER. The verb shűp is rare (cf. Job 9:17; Psalm 139:11). It is the same in both clauses.
[ Compare Revelation 12:17 -- James ]
"When translated ‘crush' it seems appropriate to the reference concerning the had of the serpent, but not quite so accurate in also rendered lie in wait for, aim at or (LXX) watch for. The Vulgate renders it "conteret," "bruise" in the first instance and in this famous passage, CALLED THE PROTEVAGEFIUM, ‘FIRST GOSPEL,' the announcement of a prolonged struggle, perpetual antagonism, wounds on both sides, and eventual victory for the seed of the woman(Genesis 3:15 & Revelation 12:17). "God's promise that the head of the serpent was to be crushed pointed forward to the coming of Messiah and guaranteed victory. Thus assurance fell upon the ears of God's earliest creatures as a blessed hope of redemption."
The Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible, Volume 3, page 782: "KENITES: Meaning (metalworkers, smiths). Clan or tribal name of semi-nomadic peoples of South Palestine and Sinai. The Aramaic and Arabic etymologis of the root ‘gyn' show that it has to do with metal and metal word (thus the Hebrew word from this root, ‘lance'). This probably indicates that the Kenites were metal workers, especially since Sinai and wadi ‘arabah were rich in high grade cooper ore. W.F. Albright has pointed to the Beni Hassan mural in Egypt (19th century B.C.),
"As an illustration of such a WONDERING GROUP OF SMITHS. This mural depicts thirty-six men, women and children in characteristic Semitic dress leading along with other animals, donkeys laden with MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, weapons and an item which Albright has identified as a BELLOWS.
He has further noted that Lemech's three children (Genesis 4:19-22) were responsible for HERDS (Jubal), MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS (Jubal), and METAL WORK (Tubal-Cain, or Tubal, THE SMITH), the three occupations which seem most evident in the mural...2nd quote from the same article: THE EARLY MONARCHY. During this period a significant concentration of Kenites was located in the southern Judean territory. This is clear from 1 Samuel 15:6 cited above and also from David's relations with them."
Postexilic references. In 1 Chronicles 2:55 the FAMILIES OF THE SCRIBES living at Jabaz are said to be Kenites. Apparently, during the kingdom and exile periods, certain Kenites had given up NOMADIC SMITHING and had taken on a more sedentary, but equally honorable PROFESSION (?) OF SCRIBE.
Peake's Commentary on the Bible, page 114: "The etymology of the name suggest THAT THEY WERE SMITHS OR ARTIFICERS, a theory which is supported by their association with the Wadi ‘Arabah, where there were copper deposits which had been worked by the Egyptians since the middle of the 3rd millennium.
The Jamieson, Fausset & Brown Commentary On The Whole bible has this to say on Kenite, page 293: "THE FAMILIES OF THE SCRIBES; either civil or ecclesiastical officers of the Kenite origin, WHO ARE HERE CLASSIFIED WITH THE TRIBE OF JUDAH, NOT AS BEING DESCENDED FROM IT, but as dwellers within its territory, and in a measure INCORPORATED with its people."
The Matthew Pool's Commentary On The Holy Bible has this to say on the Kenites, Volume 1, page 778:
"THE SCRIBES; either civil, WHO WERE PUBLIC NOTARIES, WHO WROTE AND SIGNED LEGAL INSTRUMENTS; OR ECCLESIASTICAL...and are here mentioned not as if they were of the tribe of Judah, but because thy dwelt among them, and probably were allied to them by marriages, and so in a manner incorporated with them. Which dwelt, or rather, dwelt; Hebrew, were dwellers. For the other translation, which dwelt, MAY SEEM TO INSINUATE THAT THESE WERE DESCENDANTS OF JUDAH, WHICH THEY WERE NOT; but his translation ONLY SIGNIFIES COHABITATION WITH THEM, for which cause they are here named with them."
All these things the Jews do today, here in America. And because Christians have listened to the lying, deceiving, traitorous, Priests of Baal, the Judeo-Christian Clergy they have almost destroyed our nation and are fast destroying our people.
Who Were/Are The Kenites?
It is obvious from all this that the scribes in the House of Israel, in the days of the Kings, were Kenites, and that the title of scribes was kept in the family so-to-speak, just as it is in some parts of the world today. So it is obvious that the Israelites allowed them to stay in the land with them because they were the Kenite Scribes that were living in Canaan when Israel first come into the land, after their 40 year trek through the wilderness in their escape from Egypt.
For it is the land of Canaan that Yahweh told Abraham: "In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates: THE KENITES, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites, And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims, And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Girga****es, and the Jebusites." (Genesis 15:18-21)
These verses are witnesses that Yahweh gave the land to Abram (before He changed his name to Abraham) and some 400-500 years before the Children of Israel returned to the Promised Land under the leadership of first Moses and then Joshua.
Kenites: Strong's Concordance #7017 Qeyniy (kay-nee'); or Qiyniy (1 Chronicles 2:55) (kee-nee'); patronymic from OT:7014; a Kenite or member of the tribe of Kajin: KJV - Kenite.
Kenites: Strong's Concordance #7014 Qayin (kah'-yin); the same as OT:7013 (with a play upon the affinity to OT:7069); Kajin, the name of the first child, also of a place in Palestine, and of an Oriental tribe: KJV - CAIN, Kenite (-s). (Biblesoft's New Exhaustive Strong's Numbers and Concordance with Expanded Greek-Hebrew Dictionary. Copyright (c) 1994, Biblesoft and International Bible Translators, Inc.)
[ We have ALREADY SEEN, in the first part of this treatise, that
the Hebrews were WHITE, NOT Oriental ! -- James ]
Which shows that Kenites are identified with the descendants of Cain or Kajin. Therefore, Kenites are the descendants of Cain. And since Cain intermarried (mixed race) with pre-Adamic peoples and thus the Kenites were only partially of Adamic stock; THEY WERE DEFINITELY NOT FROM THE TRIBE OF SHEM, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT SEMITES.
"The Kenites were a nomadic people whose original home was in the region just south of Palestine, and they were loosely associated with the Amalekites. Balaam, in his prophecy recorded in Numbers 24:20-23, spoke of the Kenites in connection with the Amalekites. "And he took up his parable, and said, Balaam the son of Beor hath said, and the man whose eyes are open hath said: He hath said, which heard the words of God, and knew the knowledge of the most High, which saw the vision of the Almighty, falling into a trance, but having his eyes open: I shall see him, but not now: I shall behold him, but not nigh: there shall come a Star out of Jacob, and a Sceptre shall rise out of Israel,
[ NOT out of a bunch of so-called "jews". -- James ]
and shall smite the corners of Moab, and destroy all the children of Sheth. And Edom shall be a possession, Seir also shall be a possession for his enemies; and Israel shall do valiantly. Out of Jacob shall come he that shall have dominion, and shall destroy him that remaineth of the city. And when he looked on Amalek, he took up his parable, and said, Amalek was the first of the nations; but his latter end shall be that he perish for ever. And HE LOOKED ON THE KENITES, AND TOOK UP HIS PARABLE, AND SAID, STRONG IS THY DWELLINGPLACE, AND THOU PUTTEST THY NEST IN A ROCK. NEVERTHELESS THE KENITE SHALL BE WASTED, until Asshur shall carry thee away captive. And he took up his parable, and said, Alas, who shall live when God doeth this! And ships shall come from the coast of Chittim, and shall afflict Asshur, and shall afflict Eber, and he also shall perish for ever. And Balaam rose up, and went and returned to his place: and Balak also went his way." (Numbers 24:15-25)
Jeremiah the Prophet wrote that Yahweh did NOT speak to, NOR did He give any command to Israel concerning burnt-offerings or sacrifices in the day that He brought them out of Egypt. "For I SPAKE NOT UNTO YOUR FATHERS, NOR COMMANDED THEM IN THE DAY THAT I BROUGHT THEM OUT OF THE LAND OF EGYPT, CONCERNING BURNT OFFERINGS OR SACRIFICES: But this thing commanded I them, saying, Obey my voice, and I will be your God, and ye shall be my people: and walk ye in all the ways that I have commanded you, that it may be well unto you. But they hearkened not, nor inclined their ear, but walked in the counsels and in the imagination of their evil heart, and went backward, and not forward." (Jeremiah 7:22-24)
Here we can see that Jeremiah has declared that the Kenite scribes had falsified the Law by writing lies into it. This was because the Kenites were worshipers of Baal, and the fact that animal sacrifice was a very important part of the worship of Baal, Jeremiah's proclamation and denunciation would seem to be substantiated.
Therefore, it is clear that it was the Baal worshiping Kenite Scribes who tampered with the Word of Yahweh. For He would not have commanded His Israel People, to practice the same rites of animal sacrifice that were so important to the Canaanitish worshipers of Baal? Yahweh commanded Israel not to follow the heathen.
Neither is there any mention of Cain and Abel in the Chronology of Adam listed in 1st Chronicles: "Adam, Sheth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalaleel, Jered, Henoch, Methuselah, Lamech, Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth." (1 Chronicles 1:1-4) By this we know that none of the offspring of Cain were the seed of Adam, and were the seed of the Devil, just as Christ told us in John 8:44. The very first people, that of the descendants of Adam, Seth, Abraham, Isaac (Whom we, the White Race is named after as instructed by Jacob/Israel in the 48th chapter of Genesis).
"The Angel which redeemed me from all evil, bless the lads; and let my name be named on them, and the name of my fathers Abraham and Isaac; and let them grow into a multitude in the midst of the earth." (Genesis 48:16)
This has been fulfilled, in that . And they have, have also, been called after Jathe Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic and kindred people of the earth have been called "Anglo-Saxons" after the name of Isaac Jacob/Israel because they have been called Israelites. These same people have always occupied the center of the earth, for they can be found to have created nations and civilizations just north and south of the equator.
However, we must mention here that Esau was the brother to Jacob; so he was NEVER an Israelite; but his seed would have been of mixed blood, because of his marriage to the Hittite women:
"And Esau was forty years old when he took to wife Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and Bashemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite." (Genesis 26:34)
Then we are told in Genesis 28:8-9:
"And Esau seeing that the daughters of Canaan pleased not Isaac his father; Then went Esau unto Ishmael, and took unto the wives which he had Mahalath the daughter of Ishmael Abraham's son, the sister of Nebajoth, to be his wife."
Thus we can see clearly that neither Esau nor any of his descendants were Israelites. But all of his children from that time on could be classified as Jews. Also, his descendants could be called brothers to the Arabs, because he married one of Ishmael's daughters.
The first time that a mixed multitude is mentioned in the Bible is in Exodus 12:37-38:
"And the children of Israel journeyed from Rameses to Succoth, about six hundred thousand on foot that were men, beside children. And a mixed multitude went up also with them; and flocks, and herds, even very much cattle."
Then the mixed multitude is mentioned again in Nehemiah:
"Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the mixed multitude." (Nehemiah 13:3)
There was another group of mixed breeds which came back from the Babylonian captivity with SOME of the True Israelites which returned to build the Temple. During this time the priests found that many of the Israelites had married into the other races, and had strange wives (meaning they were not Israelites) and were told to separate themselves from them:
"Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the mixed multitude." (Nehemiah 13:3)
PLEASE NOTE THAT NEITHER CAIN NOR ABLE IS MENTIONED IN ADAM'S LINE. Therefore, we can conclude from this that neither Cain nor Able were Adam's children. For if they had God certainly would have instructed that they be noted as such.
Neither is there any mention of Cain and Abel in the Chronology of Adam listed in 1st Chronicles: "Adam, Sheth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalaleel, Jered, Henoch, Methuselah, Lamech, Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth." (1 Chronicles 1:1-4) BY THIS WE KNOW THAT NONE OF THE OFFSPRING OF CAIN WERE THE SEED OF ADAM, AND WERE THE SEED OF THE DEVIL, JUST AS CHRIST TOLD US IN JOHN 8:44.
The Jewish Encyclopedia, states:
"EDOM IS IN MODERN JEWRY." (Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, p. 41)
Which is a true statement, based on the above information that we have seen in the Scriptures. The Jews know this and they know they are not Israelites because they have admitted it, both here and under the heading of "A brief History of the Terms for Jew" in the 1980 Jewish Almanac is the following:
"Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an Ancient Israelite a ‘Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew." (A brief History of the Terms for Jew, in the 1980 Jewish Almanac)
There was another group of mixed breeds which came back from the Babylonian captivity with SOME of the True Israelites which returned to build the Temple.
During this time the priests found that many of the Israelites had married into the other races, and had strange wives (meaning they were not Israelites) and were told to separate themselves from them:
"Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the mixed multitude." (Nehemiah 13:3)
This is a subject that has very effectively been obscured by society and churches in particular. Thank God, there is a remnant that understands the Bible truth concerning the seed of the serpent.
Some of you may be cognizant of the edifying details of this documentation, however we know that very few people have ever been exposed to the detailed information herein, which supports the literal and physical existence of the Luciferian seed of the serpent in our midst.
Unfortunately the heretic doctrine of virtually all churches today, expound the lie that the seed of the serpent, Satan the devil, is manifest in some obscure virus in the ethereal space, that may infect or contaminate man, causing man to be evil. (However, these Judeo-Christian churches claim they have the prescription to destroy this virus). Therefore, it is our endeavor to present the Biblical evidence, that we are all rubbing shoulders with the literal and physical seed of the serpent here on earth daily. We shall document the evidence in this matter from the undeniable researched Word of God, the Bible. Many relevant scriptures we will note for you to read, because we do not have space to quote all the pertinent documentation.
So if the seed of the serpent is literally and physically in our midst, then we would want to recognize them, wouldn't you? Let us begin with Jude 11-13:
"Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core. These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots; Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever."
Who are these "people" spoken of in these scriptures? An ilk that are spiritually and materially dead, non-productive, loud and noisy, wandering over the earth to work their diabolical deeds of rape, murder, theft and corruption, which has reserved for them the pits of hell.
We read further of these in Matthew 23:33:
"Ye serpent, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?"
Serpent: Strong's Concordance: #3789 ophis (of'-is); probably from 3700 (through the idea of sharpness of vision); a snake, figuratively (as a type of sly cunning) AN ARTFUL MALICIOUS PERSON, especially Satan: KJV– serpent.
Generation: Strong's Concordance: #1081 gennema-what has been born or begotten
a) THE OFFSPRING OR PROGENY OF MEN or animals
b) the fruits of the earth, the produce of agriculture
These are the words of Yahshua (Jesus), and it certainly behooves us to consider who He is speaking of herein. With all of the evidence in the Bible, why is the seed of the serpent in our midst a total mystery to the great majority of the people on earth? Why does Yahshua identify the seed of the serpent as Mystery Babylon in Revelation chapter 17? The answer is very simple: Because the people have rejected knowledge, and do not and have no desire to recognized the enemies of Yahshua.
"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou has forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children."
We have the first evidence in the Bible, of the seed of the serpent in Genesis 3:15:
[ Also read Revelation 12:17. -- James ]
"And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, (Lucifer and Eve) and between thy seed and her seed; (progeny, offspring) It shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel."
Here we see that Yahweh declared war between His children (seed), and the children (seed) of the serpent Lucifer. This war has been raging in the world since Genesis 3:15, to this very moment, and will not ease until the victorious second coming of Yahshua. Certainly we have the Word of God, as evidence, that the seed of the serpent exists here on earth. Therefore it is incumbent upon all Christians, to understand the who, what and where our enemies are. How can a Christian wage the Divinely ordained war for Yahshua, if we do not recognize the enemy?
The seed of the serpent has long ago infiltrated every facet of society in order to pervert the Divine plan of God. It is the duty of all true, sincere Christians to guard the keys to the Kingdom. But the truth of the matter is; we have turned the keys to the Kingdom over to the seed of the serpent, the Jews, and that is why we today have the doctrine of Balaam in our churches.
First let us consider the words of Jude 11-13, a people that are "twice dead." We read in Job 26:5:
"Dead things are formed from under the waters, and the inhabitants thereof."
We see that Job speaks of the spiritually and materially dead inhabitants formed under the waters. The prophet tells us in Isaiah 14:9:
"Hell from beneath is moved for thee at thy coming: it stirreth up the dead for thee, even the chief ones of the earth: it hath raised up from their thrones all the kings of the nations."
Indeed this tells us where most of the rulers of all nations are along with their proselytes, and we also know that the Jews have been in control of most governments ever since ancient Babylon. Please pay particular attention to the following scriptures, pertaining to the dead:
"Wilt thou show wonders to the dead? Shall the dead arise and praise thee? Shelah." (Psalm 88:10); "For her house inclineth unto death, and her paths unto the dead." (Proverbs 2:18); "But he knoweth not that the dead are there; and that her guests are in the depths of hell." (Proverbs 9:18); "The getting of treasures by a lying tongue is a vanity tossed to and fro of them that seek death." (Proverbs 21:6); "With my soul have I desired thee in the night; yea, with my spirit within me will I seek thee early: for when thy judgments are in the earth the inhabitants of the world will learn righteousness." (Isaiah 26:9)
Yahshua when speaking to the Jews in John 8:47:
"He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God."
There are a multitude of scriptures that identify the Jews as being (spiritually and materially) dead from the womb, from birth.
They are not children of Yahweh, they are a cabal of Luciferian children that are literal vampires and parasites, deriving their physical existence from the blood and material assets of the children of Yahweh. All deceit, crime, corruption, perversion, and anti-Christ activity in the world, can be traced to it's origin, the Jew and his proselytes.
Are Today's Jews True Israelites?
"Things are seldom as they seem ... Skim milk masquerades as cream." (Gilbert and Sullivan, Pinafore)
These passages were not compiled to reveal Israel's identity. However, since it has been proven that God continues to have a specific purpose and plan for His people Israel, then it becomes imperative to identify who the Israelites are and who they are not. This brings us to the second of the two questions posed in chapter 1:
Who Are The Israelites Today?
Even asking the question presupposes that there are reservations about the identity of the modern-day Jew and his relationship to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel. For the majority of Christians the answer is a foregone conclusion. Ask this question of the average person claiming to be a Christian, and he will quickly tell you: "The true descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are those people today who call themselves Jews." Yet in light of that answer, we should know that the Bible makes it very clear that there are imposters masquerading as Israelites although no Israelite blood flows through their veins. The book of Revelation informs us of this deception and the identity of these blasphemers:
I [Yahshua] know your tribulation and your poverty (but you are rich) and the blasphemy by those [imposters] who say they are Jews [Judahites] and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan. (Revelation 2:9)
In other words, there are those who claim to be of the house of Judah or Judahites, and therefore Israelites, but who in reality are imposters identified by Yahshua as a synagogue of Satan. We find a double witness to this statement in Revelation 3:9
"... I [Yahshua], will cause those of the synagogue of Satan, who say that they are Jews [Judahites], and are not, but lie - behold, I will make them to come and bow down at your feet, and to know that I have loved you. (Revelation 3:9)
Modern-day Jews themselves verify the truth of these passages in what they say and write, although in many cases their admissions are not meant for non-Jewish eyes or ears.
Posted - 19 Sep 2003 : 06:59:59
| ISRAEL: The Rise of ESAU's Army
Edom, Esau, and Idumea
Of great importance to past/current/future events is the answer to this question: Who & what is the United Nations created border-State now called ISRAEL, and what do the Hebrew manuscripts tell us about these people? First, let's take an historical look at the recent past:
"In her book My Life, former Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir recalls the 7th meeting of the Canadian Jewish Congress in the spring of 1947, when the future Zionist Israeli leader, Dr. Nahum Goldmann, boldly explained, 'We insisted on Palestine not because of religious, historical or sentimental reasons, but because Palestine is a turning table of three continents and in the military, political, and strategic sense it is the world's Center. Besides, the oil reserves in this area are much higher than on the whole American continent'."
These people don't care at all about the "Promised Land" (Caanan) God said He gave to the lineage of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Records of their various British & Canadian Congress meetings during WWII shows that they also had debated settlements in Australia, Africa, Madagascar, Poland and South America. Have we forgotten that those who settled the present-day Israel were often illegal refugees forced onto ships against their will? These are "strangers" in the border-State of Israel today as they were "strangers" in the lands of Germany, Poland, Russia, Austria, Hungary or America just 50 or so years ago. According to their own Torahs and Scriptures, they are wanderers with no inheritance in any land.
But, the 'God of Israel' knows who are really His. The two World Wars were permitted to establish Israel in the land of ancient Canaan so He could fulfill prophecy given to them -- NOT create a Mafia-state for 'strangers' to hijack the world. According to their own ancient Hebrew manuscripts, a tiny remnant of the predestined true seed of Abraham, Isaac and Israel are to be restored in the 'Covenant Land' of Caanan. There, it says the 'God of their forefathers' is to meet them in the ministry of the two prophets (as prophecied in Zechariah 4).
Beware of wolves in sheep's clothing. Beware of 'strangers.' Test all things by the PRESENT Truth of the Logos-Word. All Israel is NOT Israel, and all Christendom is NOT Christian.
The blinded people on this earth are wondering why everything is so out of order right now; why politics are upside down and inside out; why the once "Christian West" who owns and controls the world's resources (and who developed its industries and invented its technologies) is completely bankrupt; and after a purported "victory" in two World Wars, why "we" who live in the western nations have become the tail and not the head.
Who is the head? Confusion concerning the nature of world and local events exists simply because people don't truly believe the prophecies.
The complete article can be found at http://tylersword.org/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=317
Posted - 24 Sep 2003 : 23:29:42
| Excellent reply Bondservant. The other quote regarding what the ZIONISTS are REALLY after in the PROMISE LAND, is the mineral values in the dead sea, which amounts to - I believe - SEVERAL TRILLION $$$$$. I have the quote in my archives, but can't turn it up right now.
Posted - 24 Sep 2003 : 23:35:58
| I have some notes on Jews = Philistines (= Avites = Cainites?):
Though there is no further mention by this name, the Casluhim are declared to be the origin of the Philistines:
Genesis 10:14* And Pathrusim, and Casluhim <03695>, (out of whom came Philistim,) and Caphtorim.
1 Chronicles 1:12* And Pathrusim, and Casluhim <03695>, (of whom came the Philistines,) and Caphthorim.
The Casluhim themselves are not declared to have become the Philistines, rather the Philistines came out of them, perhaps of a people which made a political affiliation or commercial alliance with them. Next it will be seen that the Avites became the Philistines. Perhaps these are those who associated with the Casluhim, but that's speculation until better information is found.
There is no explicit explanation in the Bible of where the Avites came from. Their first mention is in Deuteronomy 2:
19* And when thou comest nigh over against the children of Ammon, distress them not, nor meddle with them: for I will not give thee of the land of the children of Ammon any possession; because I have given it unto the children of Lot for a possession.
20* (That also was accounted a land of giants: giants dwelt therein in old time; and the Ammonites call them Zamzummims;
21* A people great, and many, and tall, as the Anakims; but the LORD destroyed them before them; and they succeeded them, and dwelt in their stead:
22* As he did to the children of Esau, which dwelt in Seir, when he destroyed the Horims from before them; and they succeeded them, and dwelt in their stead even unto this day:
23* And the Avims which dwelt in Hazerim, even unto Azzah, the Caphtorims, which came forth out of Caphtor, destroyed them, and dwelt in their stead.)
Reading Deuteronomy 2:19-23 carefully, the Avims are seen to have destroyed the Caphtorims and dwelt in their stead. The Avims, also called Avites, are again mentioned at Joshua 13:3, confirming they prevailed against the Caphtorims:
Joshua 13:3* From Sihor, which is before Egypt, even unto the borders of Ekron northward, which is counted to the Canaanite: five lords of the Philistines; the Gazathites, and the Ashdothites, the Eshkalonites, the Gittites, and the Ekronites; also the Avites:
These Avites made the false gods Nibhaz and Tartak:
2 Kings 17:31* And the Avites made Nibhaz <05026> and Tartak <08662>, and the Sepharvites burnt their children in fire to Adrammelech and Anammelech, the gods of Sepharvaim.
According to the Strong's definitions, Avites means "perverters", and their god Nibhaz had the form of a dog, and Tartak means "prince of darkness."
The Philistines are declared to come from Caphtor:
Jeremiah 47:4* Because of the day that cometh to spoil all the Philistines, and to cut off from Tyrus and Zidon every helper that remaineth: for the LORD will spoil the Philistines, the remnant of the country of Caphtor.
Amos 9:7* Are ye not as children of the Ethiopians unto me, O children of Israel? saith the LORD. Have not I brought up Israel out of the land of Egypt? and the Philistines from Caphtor, and the Syrians from Kir?
Caphtor is named as the place in which the Caphtorims dwelled, whom the Avites destoyed and supplanted (Deut. 2:23), who are then named "Philistines" (Jer. 47:4, Amos 9:7). It is then evident that it is the Avites who God speaks against when He declares:
Ezekiel 25:16* Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I will stretch out mine hand upon the Philistines, and I will cut off the Cherethims, and destroy the remnant of the sea coast.
Zephania 2:5* Woe unto the inhabitants of the sea coast, the nation of the Cherethites <03774>! the word of the LORD is against you; O Canaan, the land of the Philistines, I will even destroy thee, that there shall be no inhabitant.
Caphtor is identified as Crete; see <03731>. It is interesting to note that in the New Testament, Paul declares the Cretians as evil liars:
10 For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision:
11 Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake.
12 One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, The Cretians are alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies.
13 This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith;
14 Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.
15 Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.
16 They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.
So it is seen that the Avites, the "perverters," have become known as the Philistines, or foreigners, who are based on or originated from the island of Crete.
Next of interest is to compare verses in 2 Kings 14 with the parallel verses in 2 Chronicles 26 to see that king Azariah, also called Uzziah, built the city of Elath, also called Eloth, among the Philsitines.
2 Kings 14:
21* And all the people of Judah took Azariah, which was sixteen years old, and made him king instead of his father Amaziah.
22* He built Elath, and restored it to Judah, after that the king slept with his fathers.
2 Chronicles 26:
1* ¶ Then all the people of Judah took Uzziah, who was sixteen years old, and made him king in the room of his father Amaziah.
2 He built Eloth, and restored it to Judah, after that the king slept with his fathers.
* * *
6* And he went forth and warred against the Philistines, and brake down the wall of Gath, and the wall of Jabneh, and the wall of Ashdod, and built cities about Ashdod, and among the Philistines.
Easton's Topical notes lists this for "Elath," topic 1143:
"Grove; trees, #De 2:8| also in plural form Eloth #1Ki 9:26| etc.; called by the Greeks and Romans Elana; a city of Idumea, on the east, i.e., the Elanitic, gulf, or the Gulf of Akabah, of the Red Sea. It is first mentioned in #De 2:8| It is also mentioned along with Ezion-geber in #1Ki 9:26| It was within the limits of Solomon's dominion, but afterwards revolted. It was, however, recovered and held for a time under king Uzziah #2Ki 14:22| Now the ruin Aila."
1 Kings 9:26* And king Solomon made a navy of ships in Eziongeber, which is beside Eloth, on the shore of the Red sea, in the land of Edom.
Elath/Eloth was a city among the Philistines. It seems clear that while the kingdom of Judah ruled over that city, it was inhabited by Philistines.
Then we read that king Rezin of Syria recovered Elath to Syria whereupon he "drave the Jews" from the city.
2 Kings 16:6* At that time Rezin king of Syria recovered Elath to Syria, and drave the Jews from Elath: and the Syrians came to Elath, and dwelt there unto this day.
This verse is the (very important) first occurance of the Hebrew word "yehuwdiy," <03064> a word patronimically derived from that for "Judah" <03063>, translated as "Jews." Some claim this word is merely another name for Judah, but it really means "Judeans," as political affiliates, as opposed to blood-line Judahites.
Some people say 2 Kings 16:6 refers to the Syrians running the people of Judah out of Elath. But Elath/Eloth was a Philistine city, though ruled by Judah. King Rezin just took control of Elath from Judah and kicked out its tenants, the Philistines.
Setting this verse in context shows of whom this first usage of the word "Jews" really speaks: Avites, perverters, foreigners to the land, attempting to hide as political affiliates: Judeans.
Since Israel rejected the rule of God and desired a king (1 Samuel 8:4-22), rejecting family cohesion and prefering political affiliations, it is no surprise to find the hated Philistines working their way into the heart of Judah, blurring the lines of separation a step at a time.
Posted - 24 Sep 2003 : 23:59:23
| Here's the Quote:
"The Jews might have had Uganda, Madagascar, and other places for the establishment of a Jewish Fatherland, but they wanted absolutely nothing except Palestine, not because the Dead Sea water by evaporation can produce five trillion dollars of metaloids and powdered metals; not because the sub-soil of Palestine contains twenty times more petroleum than all the combined reserves of the two Americas; but because Palestine is the crossroads of Europe, Asia, and Africa, because Palestine constitutes the veritable center of world political power, the strategic center for world control." (Nahum Goldman, President World Jewish Congress).
YOU CAN BELIEVE that the 5 trillion in minerals was part of the consideration ...........
Posted - 31 Oct 2003 : 00:32:52
| "Look! I will force those who belong to Satan, those liars who say they are Jews but are not, to come and bown down at your feet. They will acknowledge that you are the ones I love.” Revelation 3:9
The following is an article that traces the origins of those who call themselves "Jews".
GOG, MAGOG AND THE
KINGDOM OF THE KHAZARS
"Son of man, set thy face against Gog, the land of Magog,
the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal, and
prophesy against him." Ezekiel 38:2
"A THOUSAND YEARS before the establishment of the Modern State of Israel, there existed a Jewish kingdom in the eastern fringes of Europe, astride the Don and Volga rivers..." So begins a thesis by Jewish author Kevin Alan Brook. The kingdom of which he speaks appears at first consideration to be comprised of nearly as much disinformation, misinformation, "myth"information, and, curiously, NO-information as there is actual provable historical fact. Yet upon closer scrutiny this kingdom, known as Khazaria, or the Kingdom of the Khazars, is clearly revealed in a vast body of historical evidence, much of which has come to light only in the last three to five decades.
This mysterious kingdom, which has sculpted our modern world to an astounding (and alarming) degree, once occupied an immense land area of over a million square miles extending from western Hungary/Austria eastward to the Aural Sea, north to the Upper Volga, and its southern region extending to the Caucasus Mountains between the Black and Caspian seas. It was at that time literally the largest country on earth. It has only been in the last several decades, however, that greater documented evidence from ancient manuscripts has come to light and revealed the astonishing historical truth of this ancient kingdom and its connection to the origins of modern-day Israel.
For full article click link http://www.travesser.com/winds/khazars.html
Edited by - Adam on 31 Oct 2003 22:00:39
Posted - 31 Oct 2003 : 13:18:14
| Referring to a quote from above:
"According to many different ancient manuscripts, not just Hebrew writings, the Edomites are the descendants of Esau who married 'serpent seed women.' He basically committed genocide on the seed of Adam, Abraham and Isaac."
Is there any ties to the painting below, were Michael Angelo was commissioned to paint the serpent as half serpent and half woman:
Posted - 16 Nov 2003 : 00:58:40
| Excellent Manuel;
Abraham,Isaac & Jacob.
" In Isaac - Saac's Sons(Saxons)- shall my SEED be called ......."
Here's a couple of verses that put a few more pieces in the puzzle.........
Revelation 12:17 And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
The same seed as here:
Genesis 3:13: And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.
14: And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:
15: And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.
Gen 17:19 And God said, Sarah thy wife shall bear thee a son indeed; and thou shalt call his name Isaac: and I will establish my covenant with him for an everlasting covenant, and with his seed after him.
Gen 21:12 And God said unto Abraham, Let it not be grievous in thy sight because of the lad, and because of thy bondwoman; in all that Sarah hath said unto thee, hearken unto her voice; for in Isaac shall thy seed be called.
The SERPENT LEVIATHAN is in America. Persecution of Christians is BEGINNING, Put on the WHOLE armor of God. We now won't have to get our news about the Christians being slain in the foreign countries by the Muslims and others. We will SOON BE THE NEWS ! At the moment, Christians are being told to shut up about their religion; soon the minions of the Beast who control the 10 mile square called Washington D.C., will be bringing out the guillotines, as prescribed by TalMUD-ic "law" via Public Law 102-14. Those of us who insist on proclaiming Jesus as Deity will be decapitated.
Don't fail to check out this link:
"The following while true , believe it or not was written by an atheist."
" Vying for the authorship of the One World Religion are a number of factions, including certain interest groups that wish the theocracy to be based primarily on Judaic ideology, emulating the firm and merciless hand of Islam's mullahs and omams. Under such a dictatorship, books would be banned and burned, and freethinkers would be jailed or executed. If the Hassidic Jewish Movement has its way, the so-called Noahide Laws would be followed to the letter, as would many others found in the "Old Testament," prescribing capital punishment for abortion, euthanasia and "sexual deviation" such as adultery and homosexuality. The punishment, in fact, for breaking any of the Noahide Laws is decapitation."
[ Calling Jesus Deity, is blasphemy to a TalMUD-ic "jew". The punishment will be decapitation.
" .......the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ."
Along with the dissolution of Christianity by way of its being merged with Talmudism, equally ominous is the fact that Constitutional law is quickly being chewed up and spit out as Talmudic law. The 'Law' of the Pharisees.
On January 12, 2000, Stephen Ames, Jr., a guest on the Sweet Liberty broadcast, read to us from a book written by Menachem Elon, Deputy President, Supreme Court of Israel. (Remember the author's name - Menachem Elon. It appears in a news article following, although the newspaper spelled his first name without the 'c' -- 'Menahem'.)
Published by The Jewish Publication Society, Philadelphia Jerusalem 5754 / 1994, Elon's book is titled: JEWISH LAW; HISTORY, SOURCES, PRINCIPLES; Ha-Mishpat Ha-Ivri; Volume 1. On pages 1144-1145 the author is discussing the codification of law in Europe and the U.S. in comparison with codification of Jewish Law. Elon says of Maimonides:
"This quality of Jewish law is axiomatic and beyond dispute. Not even Maimonides, who compiled the greatest and most nearly perfect halakhic code of all, sought to establish his work as the source of halakhic authority... Nor did Maimonides entertain even the slightest idea of introducing any change in the law through his work. He then concluded: [referring to Maimonides introduction to his code book]
"Everything in the Babylonian Talmud is binding on all Israel. Every town and country must follow all the customs, give effect to the decrees, and carry out the enactments of the Talmudic Sages because the entire Jewish people accepted everything contained in the Talmud ..."
'Every town and country must . . . give effect to the decrees, and carry out the enactments of the Talmudic Sages. . . ' My casual and somewhat sarcastic remark was, "who cares what a former Israeli Supreme Court Justice says. That doesn't affect us." Next day -- as if in direct response to that conversation -- the Newark, New Jersey Star Ledger, 1-13-00, carried two articles on Talmudic law in the U.S. (emphasis added) The first headline boasted:
The Talmud confronts Florida's electric chair
By Amy Ellis Nutt; Star-Ledger Staff:
Evidence of the increased interest in Jewish legal studies at American law schools can be found in the fact that more than three dozen schools now teach the subject; that the American Association of Law School Professors has its own Jewish law section; and that there is now a Jewish law casebook being used as a reference tool in courses on the subject.
But the most profound evidence may well be found right now at the highest level of American Justice. Last month, a brief was filed before the U.S. Supreme Court regarding Florida's use of the electric chair and whether it constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, prohibited by the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution.
What makes this brief unique is that it does not rely on a single tenet of American law, but rather solely on the Talmud.
According to the two lawyers who filed the brief, Nathan Lewin and former Israel Supreme Court Justice Menahem Elon, the Talmud can provide an important way for evaluating the fair implementation of the death penalty.
"What we're saying is that under Jewish law three principles apply", Lewin told the Jerusalem Post. "That you should (execute) as painlessly as possible, as quickly as possible, and with the least mutilation of the body as possible. Those all derive from the principles that were in the Talmud 2,000 years ago". They are consistent, as well, with the Eighth Amendment. . .
"I would consider it a substantial contribution", Lewin said, "if in either a majority or concurring or some opinion, the court says,
'Look, our conclusion that this is cruel and unusual punishment is buttressed, is informed, is supported by the fact that 2,000 years ago the rabbis in the Talmud said it would be impermissible to actually burn somebody at the stake, because that would be a death that would disfigure and would cause pain over an extended period of time'.
"That would engender respect in the world at large for a body of law that we study all the time and believe is divinely inspired and worth our time and attention."
Think about what you've just read! The U.S. Supreme Court accepted a brief based solely on Talmudic Law and which did 'not rely on a single tenet of American law'. Do bear in mind that the U.S. Supreme Court was established to decide cases where the constitutionality of laws come into dispute. The U.S. Supreme Court was created by the states as a branch of the federal government under the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court is not the supreme law of this land, nor are decisions made by Supreme Court justices when those decisions effectively amend the Constitution!
It would be worthwhile to read again (from Doug Reed's book) Dr. Kastein's explanation of how the scribes translated / wrote the Talmud, along with their peculiar interpretations and interpolations:
". . . with a definite object in view, that of making it comprehensible to the Greeks; this led to the distortion and twisting of words, changes of meaning, and the frequent substitution of general terms and ideas for those that were purely local and national".
In essence then, the Talmud is a compilation of the distortions, twisted words, changed meanings, and frequent substitution by the priesthood, of the true Law of Creator. The Talmud, as Jesus charged, is man's law -- an evil and perverted law, as opposed to the immutable, changeless Laws of Creation as Jesus taught . . . to simply do unto others as you would have others do unto you, and that -- in perfect justice -- we are allowed to reap what we sow. Ignorance of the law is no excuse, because the 'knowledge of good and evil' -- knowing right from wrong -- is a knowing within each and every one of us.
Talmudic law allows and encourages homosexuality, pedophilia, sodomy, and bestiality. Talmudic law commands its adherents to charge usury to all gentiles, while forbidding lending with interest to Talmudists (Jews). In fact, in the Old Testament we find specifically the commandment of Jehovah in Deut. 15: 6 that:
"... and thou shalt lend unto many nations, but thou shalt not borrow; and thou shalt reign over many nations, but they shall not reign over thee".
Talmudic law commands the killing of all gentiles, especially Christians, since they are 'heretics' and 'blasphemers'. Jews who have fallen for the lies of the Talmud, and Christian Zionists who have fallen for the lies of their particular brand of 'Christianity' are truly people of the damned.
It appears that the Talmud prevailed before the U.S. Supreme Court, since Old Sparky has been cast out of use. Mr. Lewin's assertion that the Talmud would not permit burning at the stake because "that would be a death that would disfigure and cause pain over an extended period of time", is a lie. It belies the words and commands of their god, Jehovah, as well as the Talmudic Law itself, as stated in Sanhedrin, 64a:
"He who gives of his seed to Moloch incurs no punishment."
Moloch was an Ammorite god of the Old Testament. He who 'gave his seed' to Moloch did so by throwing his newborn baby into a fire, burning the infant alive - a human sacrifice. The Talmudic sages decreed that the act of burning a live infant as a sacrifice to Moloch incurred no punishment. Another name for Moloch could be Jehovah, as we read in Exodus 13: 1,2:
"And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, Sanctify unto me all the firstborn, whatsoever openeth the womb among the children of Israel, both of man and of beast; it is mine."
In Ezekiel 20: 25-26, because Jehovah was ticked off when his 'peculiar and special' people had not obeyed all his statutes and judgments, he said:
"Wherefore I gave them also statutes that were not good, and judgments whereby they should not live;
And I polluted them in their own gifts, in that they caused to pass through the fire all that openeth the womb, that I might make them desolate, to the end that they might know that I am the Lord."
And Jesus said:
"But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea." Matt: 18:6
The second article featured in the Star-Ledger on 1-13-2000 is a lengthy discourse on why Talmudic law is being taught in American law colleges. We will excerpt from this one. Above a photo of Rutgers-Camden Talmudic law professor, Steve Friedell, reading the Talmud in his office is the caption:
"A professor finds his calling in teaching Jewish law at Rutgers".
Using the phrase 'Jewish Law' throws the reader off track. There is no such thing as 'Jewish Law'! Jewish law is Talmudic Law. Another small photo gives a close-up shot of a book which caption states:
"Below, Friedell holds a copy of the Talmud".
What is not explained to the readers of the article is that Friedell is holding up only one volume of the 63-volume set. Instead, the Talmud is presented as 'a' book and described as:
"... the 2,000 year old book of Jewish law... a towering collection of writings, 5,422 pages long, without vowels and punctuation."
Another glaringly omitted fact is the existence of the oral law, non-written to ensure that no gentile could ever discover its content. The headline on this second article (emphasis added) reads:
He answers to a higher authority
"Friedell is a professor at Rutgers University Law School-Camden, and is one of just a handful of law school academia in the country specializing in the teaching of Jewish law. For hundreds of years in this country, law students and legal scholars have relied on American casebook law to illuminate the intricacies of our legal system.
But with globalization taking place in every area of life -- from politics to economics to art and entertainment -- law schools are now recognizing the importance of studying non-Anglo-American legal systems and incorporating such courses as Jewish law into their curricula.
. . . If a Talmudist is an expert in the Talmud, he is surely a humble one -- it is a book, says the slightly graying professor, that constantly challenges, constantly encourages debate, and leaves the student always looking for new insights.
. . . In a 1992 article he wrote for the Indiana Law Journal, Friedell quoted a character from Herman Wouk's novel, Inside, Outside:
"Under the opaque Aramaic surface of the Talmud is a magnificent structure of subtle legal brilliancies, all interwoven with legend, mysticism, the color of ancient times, and the cut-and-thrust of powerful minds in sharp clash. I can't get enough of it, and I've been at it for decades."
Clearly Friedell feels likewise.
. . . Rayman Solomon, the dean of Rutgers-Camden Law School is a big supporter of Friedell. "There has been a real renaissance in the study of Jewish law", says Solomon, "and a renewed interest in comparative law in general: Roman law, Greek law, Jewish law.."
. . . Friedell, who says that more than half of his Jewish law classes are composed of non-Jewish students, holds his specialized seminar every other year at the Law School in Camden. When he is not teaching the course in Camden, he is teaching it as an undergraduate course in New Brunswick -- but using Hebrew texts.
. . . Says Friedell: "The Talmud isn't studied for any particular reason, it's studied just as an end in itself. It's a boundless sea. . . And I've just scratched the surface".
So there it is... 'with globalization taking place in every area of life', why should we rely only on the U.S. Constitution as our basis of law? Our option, of course, would be to obey the 'law of nations' via the International Criminal Court, founded on Talmudic Law. The Talmud 'constantly challenges, constantly encourages debate, and leaves the student always looking for new insights'. Those 'new insights' are nothing more than interpretations of vaguely written laws -- vaguely written to invite interpretation, depending upon the circumstances and the individuals concerned.
To illustrate that the interpretation does indeed depend upon the individuals and circumstances involved: In 1979, three Jewish legislators, Elizabeth Holtzman, Joshua Eilberg and William Lehman, heavily supported by major Jewish organizations, successfully lobbied for passage of the 'Holtzman Amendment'. This new law created the OSI (Office of Special Investigations of the Justice Department) to ferret out alleged 'Nazi war criminals' living in the U.S.
Over its twenty-year history, at a cost of $60,000,000, fifty octogenarians have been deported as a result of the mostly-Jewish staffed OSI's 'ferreting'. Two fairly recent example of their activities and double standards were found first in a 11-4-1998 Chicago Sun Times article (excerpted):
"Jewish community leaders applauded an immigration judge's decision to deport (Bronislaw Hajda, 74) who served as a guard in a Nazi labor camp in WWII."
One of the Jews said that, 'a measure of justice is achieved'. So, fifty-three years after the war, a former soldier (who was 21 years old at the time of his alleged 'crime') was deported, forever separated from family, friends, and his home of more than half a century, in spite of that fact that absolutely no crime could be proven against him. On the other side of the coin, just one month later, an Associated Press article that appeared in several major papers on 12-9-1998 stated:
"Warsaw -- Israel has refused to extradite a Jew accused of atrocities against German prisoners in Poland after WWII, the Polish Justice Ministry said yesterday. Solomon Morel, who commanded the Swietochlowice camp for Germans in southern Poland from February to November 1945, allegedly tortured inmates and is considered responsible for at least 1,538 deaths.
Israel refused Poland's request for extradition, saying the statute of limitations had run out". from: End Times - End Games by Hans Schmidt
Where Jewish revenge is concerned, there is no statute of limitations, even when no crime has been proven against an individual. Yet, when a Jew commits genocide against gentiles, Israel refuses to extradite on grounds that the statute of limitations ran out. The OSI is funded by Americans (98% gentiles according to census figures).
Now comes the International Criminal Court (ICC), as part and parcel of the globalization of law. Not a new idea, the ICC was first dubbed the International Court of Justice less than a year after the U.S. signed Americans up as members of the United Nations Organization, to keep the peace, mind you. As reported in U.S. Department of State Publication 2808, 1947, on page 2 we read:
The Acting United States Representative to the United Nations to the
Secretary General of the United Nations
United States Delegation to the United Nations
August 26, 1946
"EXCELLENCY: I have the honor to transmit herewith, under cover of a note dated August 16, 1946. . . a Declaration by the president of the United States of America [Harry S. Truman] recognizing, on behalf of the United States of America, the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice under Article 36 of the Statute of the Court.
My action today in depositing this Declaration, accepting on behalf of the United States the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice, is further testimony to the determination of my Government to do all in its power to assure that the United Nations will fulfill the role assigned to it, which is nothing less than the preservation of world peace.
One of the most elemental functions of the United Nations in the preservation of world peace is the development of procedures of pacific settlement. In these procedures, the role and functions of law is clear. We feel that international law is already sufficiently developed to serve as a guide and basis in international relations. We feel further that the best way of assuring its further development, and the only way of enabling it to fulfill its function, is by referring to a responsible international tribunal all disputes properly justiciable by such a tribunal.
We accordingly look forward to a great development of the rule of law in international relations through a broad acceptance of the function of the Court in the spirit of this Charter. Accept, Excellency, the renewed assurances of my highest consideration. -- Herschel V. Johnson
Harry Truman's declaration on behalf of the United States of America, on August 16, 1946, stated in part the recognition of the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice in all legal disputes hereinafter arising concerning the interpretation of a treaty; any question of international law; and the nature or extent of the reparation to be made for the breach of an international obligation.
In March, 1994, the U.S. Congress passed legislation authorizing the implementation of an International Criminal Court. Professor Cherif Bassiouni, of DePaul University in Chicago -- the leading academic proponent of the ICC, who is world-renowned for his expertise on the subject -- had proposed expanding greatly on the list of crimes under ICC jurisdiction, arguing in favor of the "broadest possible jurisdiction of the court".
He proposed such additional international crimes as environmental offenses, insults to a foreign State and disseminating false or distorted information. The same group who created and controls the UN also owns and controls the media, which consistently disseminates false and distorted information. That won't count of course. The list of crimes isn't complete, by the way, and once the UN's Court is fully recognized we can count on the list ever-expanding as the ICC tests its power.
A report by the Congressional Research Service (August 14, 1990 - Revised: March 9, 1993), authored by Daniel Hill Zafren, had this to say about adding to the list of 'International Crimes': (excerpted):
"Summary: While a complex and controversial subject. . . recent world events have supplied a new impetus for serious study and consideration of such a proposal, along with the possibility of increasing categories of war crimes and, perhaps, even enactment of an international criminal code.
Introduction: ". . . two areas of thought have been receiving increased attention. One is the possible formation of an international criminal court. . . and/or the already established international crimes, as well as taking jurisdiction over any additional crimes that may be established by any future international criminal code.
Some arguments in favor of such a proposal: The United Nations International Law Commission has declared that the establishment of a permanent international criminal court is possible, and has suggested a workable structure for it. . .
It would symbolize the supremacy of law. It would be the start of legal respect for, and making more effective, the construction of an international order. . . "
Recall that the United Nations, a.k.a. the League of Nations, a.k.a. the League to Enforce Peace is "a Jewish idea", as Nahum Sokolow stated at the Carlsbad Congress on 8-24-1922.
The International Criminal Court will serve as the 'keeper of peace' for the world, when the priesthood comes into its full power -- if they succeed. (They've been trying for 3,000 years and haven't succeeded yet). According to Theodore Pike's Israel - Our Duty our Dilemma, the final gathering of Jews won't be only in Israel, for they believe that the whole world will be their playground. From pp. 54-55):
"In legal and business matters, the Gentile also found himself beneath equality with the Jew. This - as the Jewish Encyclopedia explains under 'Gentile' p.620 - was because the Gentiles had been 'outlawed' by God from the beginning:
"The passage in Moses' farewell address: 'The Lord came from Sinai, and rose up from Seir unto them; he shined forth from Mount Paran'. . . indicates that the Almighty offered the Torah to the Gentile nations also, but, since they refused to accept it, He withdrew His 'shining' legal protection from them, and transferred their property rights to Israel, who observed His law.
A passage in Habaakuk is quoted as confirming this claim: 'God came from Teman, and the Holy One from Mount Paran. . . He stood and measured the earth he beheld, and drove asunder [outlawed] the nations.'. . . the Talmud adds that He had observed how the Gentile nations steadfastly refused to obey the seven moral Noachian precepts, and hence He decided to outlaw them [the Gentile nations]". Baba Kama (38a)
So, according to the Talmud, all land is their land. In an article by J. Zane Walley, of the Paragon Foundation titled "A Lightening Bolt of Reality -- The Forced Relocation of Rural Populations", Walley said:
"I followed that thread into the spool and stumbled on a United Nations website, U.N. Protected Areas in the United States. The website contained 129 fine-print pages of U.N. Protected areas in America! 129! Millions upon millions of acres of our country are listed. Those protected areas are regulated by the IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources). When I compared the U.N protected areas to regions that are under fire from federal regulators and environmental takings that force people from the land, I found they are the same.
In researching the IUCN I found that they are the environmental agency of the United Nations, bringing together 76 states, 111 government agencies, 732 NGOs (non-governmental organizations), 36 affiliates, and some 10,000 scientists and experts from 181 countries. Their membership list of signatory American agencies and NGOs has dumbfounded me.
U.S agencies with IUCN membership and providing funding include: Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Department of the Interior, National Park Service, U.S. Agency for International Development, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce and Department of State.
Other documents also have severely unnerved me. The United Nations Program of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development produced a how-to manual, The Forced Relocation of Rural Populations, which was distributed in Africa and included the stated mission,
"To foster a more balanced spatial distribution of the population by promoting in an integrated manner equitable and ecologically sustainable development."
Our own government has two publications in print that will raise your hackles: The first, Your Rights and Benefits as a Displaced Person, (Pub. No. FHWA-PD-95-010) states, "Government programs designed to benefit the public often result in acquisition of private property and sometimes in the displacement of people from their residences, businesses, or farms."
The other pamphlet, Acquiring Real Property for Federal and Federal Aid Programs and Projects (Publication No. FHWA-PD-95 -005), spells out how the government can take your land. The U.S Government publications and the U. N. Manual have analogous themes."
For our reader who wants to verify the 'UN Protected Area' program, specifically in the United States, listed by State alphabetically, the direct access URL is:
Whose bright ideas do you suppose are the federal, state and local laws, rules, and regulations that have laid claim to hundreds of thousands of square miles of land in these united States? And progressive taxation on private property, so the worker bees lose their homes when the taxes climb beyond their ability to pay? And the tens of thousands of farms lost to the bankers, by hook and by crook?
People (non-lawyers) who have spent years studying law in the U.S. claim there are 6,000,000 laws on the books today. When one takes into account the myriads of ordinances in the thousands of local units of government, combined with state and federal laws, along with bureaucratic rules and regulations that are given force of law, that figure doesn't sound like a stretch.
In our Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for the 2001-02 session there are over 600 proposed new laws relating to taxation alone! See what the Protocols say about that:
"From this follows that taxation will best be covered by a progressive tax on property.
The tax upon the poor man is a seed of revolution. . .
A tax increasing in a percentage ratio to capital will give a much larger venue than the present individual or property tax, which is useful to us now for the sole reason that it excites trouble and discontent among the people." Protocol No. 20
It would not be wise to dismiss this as lightly as I initially dismissed the quote in Menachem Elon's book on Jewish (Talmudic) Law. Could this 'vast and living work' called the Talmud, be the reason why judges in today's court systems are so flagrantly violating Constitutional law in favor of their 'interpretation' of the law? The answer to that can also be found in the Protocols:
"Under our influence the execution of the laws of the goyim has been reduced to a minimum. The prestige of the law has been exploded by the liberal interpretations introduced into this sphere.
In the most important and fundamental affairs and questions judges decide as we dictate to them, see matters in the light wherewith we enfold them for the administration of the goyim, of course, through persons who are our tools though we do not appear to have anything in common with them...
In general, our judges will be elected by us only from among those who thoroughly understand that the part they have to play is to punish and apply laws and not to dream about the manifestations of liberalism at the expense of the educationary scheme of the State, as the goyim in these days imagine it to be." Protocol No. 15
Could this be the reason why the laws from both the U.S. Congress and State Legislatures - for that matter from Local Governments too - are written so broadly and vaguely? Of course it is. And under which 'authority' are the laws written? Is that authority the Constitution for the United States of America or the Babylonian Talmud? The answer to that is becoming all too frighteningly clear.
Who drafts the language for those great numbers of laws, given we know it isn't the legislators themselves? The drafters are the swarms of lawyers (Jesus called them 'scribes') who work for the multitudes of non-governmental organizations and environmentalist groups. And who do you suppose owns the environmentalist movement?
For state and local governments there are (at last count) 56 adjunct organizations created by the Council of State Governments (CSG) mentioned earlier. Proposed state laws are written by the lawyers for these various organizations and heavily lobbied within the halls and offices of government.
To name but a few of these NGOs: National Association of Governors, National Conference of State Legislators, National Association of Counties (affiliated with the state associations, which brag of their 'offices on Capitol Hill in D.C.')... there are associations of Chiefs of Police, Mayors, Township Supervisors, Secretaries of State, Lieutenant Governors, the list is seemingly endless. It could be safely asserted that there is an 'association' for every elected official and appointed bureaucrat.
On the other side of this same coin is the independent ALEC - American Legislative Exchange Council - purportedly established as a 'conservative alternative' to the more liberal NCSL. ALEC was established by Paul Weyrich and became the most powerful lobby in state legislatures during the mid-seventies through the early nineties attempting to dupe the legislators into calling for a Constitutional Convention, in order to finally rid themselves of that pesky instrument (the Constitution for the united States of America). They nearly succeeded.
Before we leave off here we must mention that state legislators today - at least in Pennsylvania - are advised in their various committees by hired Executive Directors. As one researcher was told, their duties are to 'guide and direct the state legislators'.
The Pennsylvania Association of County Commissioners is 'guided and directed' by an executive director who 'works closely with the state legislature in promulgating laws pursuant to the local governments'. The newest fad in Pennsylvania is a bewildering array of Tax Fairness Laws. This brings to mind another statement from the Protocols.
"The administrators, whom we shall choose from among the public, with strict regard to their capacities for servile obedience, will not be persons trained in the art of government, and will therefore easily become pawns in our game in the hands of men of learning and genius who will be their advisers, specialists... Protocol No. 2
And how, indeed, are the people to perceive the underlying meaning of things when their representatives give the best of their energies to enjoying themselves?" Protocol No. 10
For the sake of continuity at this juncture, let us repeat two earlier quotes; the first from Protocol No. 9:
"Above the existing laws without substantially altering them, and by merely twisting them into contradictions of interpretations, we have erected something grandiose in the way of results.
These results found expression first in the fact that the interpretations masked the laws; afterwards they entirely hid them from the eyes of the governments owing to the impossibility of making anything out of the tangled web of legislation"
And from Brian Kennedy's Freemasonic Destruction of Western Civilization:
"The U.S. legal system enshrined the Talmudic practice of building up 'case law' on fine distinctions, and hairsplitting nuances. Black can be made white or vice-versa, under such a system. It is a made-to-order recipe for tyranny and manipulation by unseen authority...
Of course, this was the intention from the very beginning. Jews have been controlled by their rabbis for two thousand years under the pernicious system."
Here's what the law students in the U.S. are learning today. A book from Penn State University, written by Benjamin Henszey, Barry Myers and Reed Phalan titled Introduction to Basic Legal Principles states:
"The law can be defined, therefore, as a body of rules for human conduct, enforced by a governing power, as the means by which the control of society is achieved.
The term society includes the neighborhood, town, state, nation and to the extent control among nations is achieved through law, the world.
The rules of law that exist today are the result of a process of gradual evolution over centuries of social progress, a process which continues unabated."
Is there more than one book of law that has survived throughout centuries and is being used globally, including in the U.S. Supreme Court? The people of said 'book' are scattered to the ends of the earth and are bound to obey the laws contained therein. As we've also learned, the elite among the people of the Talmud are advisors to those who occupy - or they themselves occupy - positions of the highest political, economic and judicial power in this country and across the face of this earth.
According to a document from Georgetown University titled the "Law of the ****ar" - being Jewish commercial law as early as 1060 AD in Europe - the Uniform Commercial Code is based on that law of the ****ar. With its adoption by all fifty states, the UCC has become national in nature. This explains the harmonization of Americas' laws with other nations, for the UCC is international law.
For its application in the U.S., the UCC was constructed by a group of lawyers from the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws - a permanent standing sub-committee created by the American Bar Association - which claims the UCC is the single most important document since the Constitution. The NCCUSL is also known as the 'Uniform Law Commission'.
From its history on the ULC website we read that:
"Most significant was the 1940 Conference decision to attack major commercial problems with comprehensive legal solutions -- a decision that set in motion the project to produce the Uniform Commercial Code in partnership with the American Law Institute. The Code took ten years to complete and another 14 years before it was enacted across the country. It remains the signature product of the Conference. . . "
So, one by one, state legislatures adopted the Uniform Commercial Code. Courts of Justice become courts of commerce, and Americans wonder why their 'Constitutional rights' are being trampled in those seemingly foreign courts. We found confirmation regarding the Law of the ****ar in a most unusual source - the Harper Collins' Atlas Of World History. On pages 102 and 103, titled: The Jewish diaspora - AD 70 to 1497 - we read that:
"For over 2000 years the history of the Jews has been a story of external dispersion and internal cohesion.
From about the 6th century... Jews became identified with international and regional trade."
'International and regional trade' is regulated under the the NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) and GATT/WTO (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization). These agreements control commerce between nations.
Recall the speech of Secretary of State, Cordell Hull, in 1941 proclaiming the end of nationalism and the imperialism of industry and free trade to be commenced after the defeat of Germany. Recall the main points agreed upon by the gathering of churchmen in 1942 declaring a world monetary system, open borders, etc.
Some of the people of the Talmud -- not all mentioned previously -- who wielded control of the U.S. Government, therefore its foreign policy since the early 1900s , under Wilson (WWI) and Roosevelt (WWII) are Supreme Court Justices Louis Brandeis and Felix Frankfurter, Samuel Untermeyer, Col. Edward Mandel House, Bernard Baruch, and the whole gang of international bankers.
When international agreements made by the U.S. Congress prove to be nothing more than instruments of destruction to the manufacturing base, the jobs base, and therefore the very economic structure of our society... state legislators have an oath-bound duty to opt out of those agreements.
NAFTA and GATT/WTO are often referred to as 'treaties'. They are not treaties. Both were passed in Congress by a simple majority of both chambers. Treaties are ratified only the the U.S. Senate by two/thirds of those present and consenting.
As for the Uniform Commercial Code, the same above mentioned World Atlas has this to say, of the Jews:
"Internal and external factors, including the widespread dispersal of Jews both in Islamic lands and throughout Christian Europe, Jewish group solidarity, facility of linguistic communication, and a uniform system of commercial law based on the Talmud accounted for the changes . . ."
'Facility of linguistic communication' - Hebrew school, so no matter where they live or what the language of their host country, they can always communicate.
'Jewish group solidarity' - a nation within nations.
'A uniform system of commercial law based on the Talmud' - the UCC.
Before we leave the Uniform Commercial Code, let us see what the code itself reveals, again, from the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) website:
U.C.C. - ARTICLE 1- GENERAL PROVISIONS
PART 1. SHORT TITLE, CONSTRUCTION, APPLICATION AND SUBJECT MATTER OF THE ACT
§ 1-102. Purposes; Rules of Construction; Variation by Agreement.
(1) This Act shall be liberally construed and applied to promote its underlying purposes and policies.
'Liberally construed' like the Talmud, to give the courts broad leeway in their interpretations, to promote its underlying purposes and policies? Think about it.
Earlier we quoted from Ted Pike's book, which transcribed a statement from the Jewish Encyclopedia, to wit:
". . . the Talmud adds that He [Jehovah] had observed how the Gentile nations steadfastly refused to obey the seven moral Noachian precepts, and hence He decided to outlaw them [the Gentile nations]'. Baba Kama (38a)
Before we leave the subject of Talmudic Law, we need to take a serious look at the 'seven moral Noachian precepts', also known as the Noahide (or Noachide) Law. . . from the Talmud, for the Goyim only.
I repeat; DO NOT FAIL TO GO TO THIS LINK to get the BIG Picture:
I do NOT ask that God bless America; I beg that He have MERCY on this rotten WHORE HOUSE of a country, with its rotten WHORE POLITICIANS who have sold us out, and which makes
Sodom and Gomorrah look like a Church gathering.
The horseman is here!