| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| kirkguardian |
Posted - 29 Jan 2004 : 11:05:47
I've seen some interesting philosophical discussion going on here about the corporation sole. However, as I understand it, this particular forum area is for the discussion of law, and it doesn't appear to me that we've actually done much in the way of getting to the legal specifics of the corporation sole.
Many corporation sole internet sites are selling the corporation sole, and boasting of its alleged benefits, including tax immunity and asset protection. However, none of them offer much of anything to back up their interesting theories, other than their own wishful thinking.
I've found it problematic that there is so little on the internet that gives the other side of the corporation sole story. As the old adage goes, "There's two sides to every story."
Recently I've discovered a site that actually gives the other side of the corporation sole story, and it includes some very interesting articles that I've never seen any of before on any other corporation sole site. It's at http://geocities.com/corporatesole
Perhaps after folks here review some of those articles, we could then have some serious legal discussion here about the corporation sole (just a suggestion).
UPDATE 3-21-04: another very informative page I'm aware of is at http://hushmoney.org/corporate-sole_facts.htm |
| 20 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| David Merrill |
Posted - 20 Sep 2004 : 12:08:18
A pointer is Google "My Search" and this gives you a costom configuration of search engines by which you may find some of the warning trailers out there.
Regards,
David Merrill. |
| kirkguardian |
Posted - 20 Sep 2004 : 11:27:45
quote:
Originally posted by David Merrill
Experience tells me you will not be seeing the cites. Maybe they cannot be found any longer?
I'm looking for "sites" (as in web sites) not "cites" (as in "citations").
It would indeed appear that Linda Kruger has taken down her two web sites. However, some of her clients reposted her emails, as well as some of her web pages, on various forums.
There's some interesting debate on the corporation sole with Andrew DeDominicis of Impact Ministries International at http://hushmoney.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=186
There's also some interesting discussion of "Brother Andrew" and his connection to scam artists like Linda Kruger and Laurel LaFerrara at http://hushmoney.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=195 |
| David Merrill |
Posted - 19 Sep 2004 : 10:25:40
Dear Kirkguardian;
Experience tells me you will not be seeing the cites. Maybe they cannot be found any longer?
There was a fellow in Florida named Eddie Ray KAHN who gave the corporation sole a shot through his organization American Rights Litigators, which I think was a corporation sole. I drafted remedy for Eddie Ray but instead of forum shopping to common law, he was one to try traversing and combining whatever worked from whatever forum. So by mixing the bankrupt forum strategies into common law, he eventually got shut down by the Treasury. [I think the main problem was that he appointed his paralegal to liaison between us. The paralegal understood the concepts to learn from the counterclaim but Eddie just wanted to pick and choose what would work in the corporate forum.]
I have not studied corporation sole much because it does not interest me personally. But when Eddie wanted me to incorporate it into remedy I presumed he was saying "corporation soul" - breathing life into an artificial entity. What was amusing is how long Eddie and I talked about the construct with that misunderstanding. As though sole and soul were synonymous. We came to that conclusion when I wrote him and he saw my spelling.
So I propose readers think about that one. In the realm of debt (death) currencies the only functional entities are DEAD. Look on a memorial wall or gravestone at the name, ALL UPPER CASE. A corporation of man is not alive - see Dead Hand:
quote:
MORTMAIN. An unlawful alienation of lands, or tenements to any corporation, sole or aggregate, ecclesiastical or temporal. These purchases having been chiefly made by religious houses, in consequence of which lands became perpetually inherent in one dead hand, this has occasioned the general appellation of mortmain to be applied to such alienations. 2 Bl. Com. 268; Co. Litt. 2 b; Ersk. Inst. B. 2, t. 4, s. 10; Barr. on the Stat. 27, 97.
2. Mortmain is also employed to designate all prohibitory laws, which limit, restrain, or annul gifts, grants, or devises of lands and other corporeal hereditaments to charitable uses. 2 Story, Eq. Jur. _1137, note 1. See Shelf. on Mortm. 2, 3.
Bouvier's Law Dictionary - 1856.
In view that this Mortgaging (Mort = death; Gage = promise or bond) is universal among the corporate souls (legal names and NOM DE GUERRE/Strawmen on the Birth Certificate bond) one should be very careful about the use of corporate sole. And I mean, if you use one, follow the rules of your new creator corporation - ruling the dead in death:
quote:
Romans 6:16 Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
Regards,
David Merrill.
P.S. The concept can be found in Strong's @ neoteros and anthropos Greek #444 for defining a MAN. Notice Peter who evaded capture for cutting the Herodian Guard's ear by slipping out of his clothing (Mark 14:51, G #3495 [also see Matthew 19:20-24]) years later ran ahead of Shaul (later Paul) and warned Jesus in the Jewish community up north in Damascus. And thus by the codifiers of the account (Mark 4:10-12), deserved to bear the regenerate connotation of neoteros (new creature).
Also Qabbalists will tell you erroneously that the "breath of life" breathed into Adam was the holy ruach. But researching the text will reveal it was the neshmat chaim. Hebrew expresses three different levels of spiritual being 1) nephesh #5315 - the lowest like animation in a dog or flower, 2) ruach #7307 - higher 'soul' of a man or woman and 3) neshemah #5397 - this is the image of God within; the promise of an eternal relationship.
|
| kirkguardian |
Posted - 15 Sep 2004 : 11:18:25
I'm still interested, curiousinchrist, to see the links you mentioned.
I did however want to let folks here know that there's some very interesting information on Andrew DeDominicis ("Brother Andrew") of Impact Ministries International at http://hushmoney.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?p=409, and Linda Kruger of Living By The Word Ministries and Let's Prosper Together at http://hushmoney.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?p=408 |
| kirkguardian |
Posted - 14 Sep 2004 : 22:31:14
quote:
Originally posted by curiousinchrist
If you require witnesses as to the evil perpertrayted i can forward you to some sites where many are viocing discontent..
Since this is a thread I started I'll exercise my prerogative to allow the highjack to continue (no one seemed to make any direct comments to my original post, anyway).
I for one, curiousinchrist, would be most interested in seeing the evidence you speak of regarding Linda Kruger and Brother Andrew DeDominicis.
Please respond and post the sites here that you've alluded to. It would also be helpful to know if Andrew DeDominicis is a party to Linda Kruger's scam. All I can determine is that Andrew DeDominicis is the Overseer for Impact Ministries International, a corporation sole, and Impact Ministries International is the Resident Agent for Linda Kruger's corporation sole, Office Of The Presiding Overseer Of Living By The Word Ministries. |
| curiousinchrist |
Posted - 15 Feb 2004 : 04:01:35
Many thanks to those good people that responded to the dilemna i have facing me and sincere apologies to those who felt i had hijacked the main purpose of this thread.
advice has been sought , gratiously received and my route to the truth has been set,
thank you all again. |
| Bondservant |
Posted - 14 Feb 2004 : 13:49:32
This thread is titled "Corporation Sole: just another urban legend?", NOT "Is Linda Kruger a sinner?".
Get back on subject and confine your Linda Kruger comments and statements to private messages and emails among yourselves, not here on the forum. |
| Livefree |
Posted - 14 Feb 2004 : 13:08:26
The photo is probably old, and she is probably dead. |
| DanielJacob |
Posted - 14 Feb 2004 : 11:23:58
Again brother, I will say, post the evidence of your charges here so that the body may judge. If what you state in your post is true then it would appear that judgment is already being applied if those that have chosen to follow that path are leaving or being driven out. As you know, God is not mocked without retribution, and if this Linda Kruger is guilty of the charges you have made then she will pay for it. Again I will ask: Where and by what manner has Linda Kruger made presentments upon these threads? I don't remember reading anything here from her.
Now, as to you brother, do not let your furor cause you to attack other brothers just because they fail to act in a manner that you believe demonstrates a lack of conviction in the Eternal. Are we not told: One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth: at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established.
May His Peace be on your house.
|
| n/a |
Posted - 14 Feb 2004 : 09:03:55
Curiousinchrist, who is this Brother Andrew you speak of? |
| curiousinchrist |
Posted - 14 Feb 2004 : 02:04:08
If you require witnesses as to the evil perpertrayted i can forward you to some sites where many are viocing discontent..
not all, as myself, are worded completely in His way through the bible but it is obvious the concensus is thay linda kruger is a whore of the devil and cares not for those who she entraps as long as her personal gain increases...her "family" dwindles each day as they wake up to her abhorrent misuse of the good Lord's name...they depart under intimidation for simply requesting the truth..they are forced to depart involuntarily for questioning the situation and are then branded evil and demons.......
this woman is a fake, a Pharisee, a hypocrite,a despicable fraud in His name, an absolute abhorrence to the teachings of Him.........
Brother Andrew....why do you persist in sheltering this evil amidst those who are truly genuine to Him?
Would it be that you are also a fraud and have assisted the evil endeavours to mislead the lpT2 family with your corp.sole endeavours which fell into oblivion whilst you pocketed set up fees?
And Hermes who stated he could set up off shore bank accounts for a fee which never eventuated and thousands of dollars were spent and vanished from the good faithful's pockets as the susceptible disappeared with takings , leaving a trail of excuses in their wake....
sorry, but Brother Andrew you too are a fraud and will face the ultimate judgement for the misuse of your "position"...
again....why do you not respond........ |
| DanielJacob |
Posted - 13 Feb 2004 : 18:23:17
Curiousinchrist,
Perhaps, if you are seeking a court, you would/could present the evidence of two or three witnesses. I know not of this Linda Kruger or of any posts that she has made upon these threads. To charge one with hyprocrisy requires more than ones own determination.
Peace. |
| curiousinchrist |
Posted - 13 Feb 2004 : 14:41:27
well , that is the thought of many.........thank you
why is it then that her group of Pharisees is permitted to be a member of this good gathering of true christians?
why hasn her hypocrisy been allowed to remain here and soil the general good intention of registered groups here?
is brother andrew not aware of such abomimations to the good Lord's name?
is he not prepared to banish the evil? |
| Livefree |
Posted - 13 Feb 2004 : 10:18:17
"in basic english...is linda kruger fit to be an overseer of a christian group or has she proved herself to be nothing more than a fraud and disciple of the devil?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, she is the disciple of the devil. I'd stay away from her as if she were the devil himself. In fact, I'd stay away from all gamblers and gambling all together. |
| Oneisraelite |
Posted - 13 Feb 2004 : 07:23:09
[quote]Originally posted by oneisraelite
Greetings once more in the name of the King, brothers and sisters:
And again, peace be upon the house.
To further understand this we must first know what a "kingdom" is. It is made up of two words [one shortened], king and dominion and means the "king's dominion" or "jurisdiction". Jurisdiction is NOT a place, it is a condition.
This is why on virtually all applications [prayers] there is a line that says: STATE_____________________ They are asking us for our condition. If we say CALIFORNIA, for example, then we are alleging that we are in "the condition or status of CALIFORNIA", which is truth if one has volunteered to be a 14th Amendment citizen! These lifeless creatures are subsidiaries or franchises of the "Mother" corporation known as the UNITED STATES, U.S., ad nauseum
But as for me and my house, we shall serve Yahweh. Thus if one was "SILLY" enough to fill out one these "PRAYERS" try putting Yahweh on that line!!!
Genesis 1:27 So Yahweh created man in his own image, in the image of Yahweh created he him; male and female created he them.
Let him who has ears to hear, let him hear.
fellowcitizen of the commonwealth of Yisra'el, NOT the STATE OF ISRAEL. |
| Oneisraelite |
Posted - 13 Feb 2004 : 06:42:06
Greetings and salutations in the name of the King once more:
Peace be unto the house.
Shall we continue?
We recently read a piece by brother Richard Anthony: which made this seemingly unusual statement: "I am not religious, religion is death..." He is exactly right!! Religion is the tool used by the kosmokrator to "re-bind" Yahweh's Peculiar People. It turns the Word of Yahweh into a lie that we are enticed into serving the creature [man-made governments] and not the Creator [YaHuWeH] who is blessed for ever. 'amein.
Do yourselves a favor and follow the word trail connected with 'el, 'elohiym etc. You will find rather than "god" that they lead to the Hebrew word 'aiyl and means, "SPECIFICALLY!! CHIEF (POLITICALLY)"...this is the beginning of understanding. Here for your edification is one of the definitions [the correct one] of the word GOD from Webster's 1828 Dictionary of American English: GOD, n. 3. A prince; a ruler; a magistrate or judge... 4. Any person or thing...honored as the chief good.
Note here the use of the word "good". It is here used as a noun. So let us look that word up next, as a "noun".
GOOD, n. That which contributes to diminish or remove pain, or to increase happiness or prosperity; benefit; advantage; opposed to evil or misery.
And what did the Lawfull Counsellor tell us? Pay close attention...
Mattith'yahu [Matthew] 19:17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, Yahweh: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the Commandments.
He is adhereing to the Word of Yahweh here!!
Yasha'yahu [Isaiah] 43:11 I, even I, am Yahweh; and beside me there is no saviour. [Note: Yasha'yahu (Isaiah) means "Yahweh is Saviour" the name attributed by Dr Strong as the name of the Wonderful Counsellor sent to Yerusalem. If what Dr Strong says is truth, then the Messenger sent to Yerusalem would be Isaiah in the English translations, which it is apparently NOT!] Again, we digress...so on with the subject matter at hand...
Thus, whomever provides us with, benefits, privileges, advantages and protection is our god!!! and though many of us honour Him with our lips, our heart be far away. We "pray" to some nameless god or lord [baal], then fill out our applications [applications are prayers; follow the word trail if you don't believe us] to the kosmokrator or one of his many, many subsidiaries [for we are legion] for relief [deliverance]. And then scream..."god has answered my prayers and given me this new Cadillac!!" Ridiculous!! If Yahweh wanted you to have a Cadillac, you would NOT have to ask Him for one!!
The Latin word "christianus" means "sense development as in SILLY"
Webster's New World Dictionary of American English - Third College Edition, copyright 1988, page327: "cretin n. [[...<Christianus, CHRISTIAN: sense development as in SILLY"
Want Sciptural verification of this matter?
Titus 1:12 "One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, The Cretians [christians] are alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies."
When the followers of the Anointed One were first called "christians" in Antioch this is what they meant!!! It was akin to calling a white man a honkey or a black man a nigger...it was of the uttermost derogatory.
II Timothy 3:11 "Persecutions, afflictions, which came unto me at Antioch...what persecutions I endured: but out of them all Yahweh delivered me."
Now, please comprehend here that not all of the people of Antioch were "persecutors"...the Gentiles listened, the Iewes "stoned", i.e. "persecuted".
Ezekiel 12:2 Son of man, thou dwellest in the midst of a rebellious house, which have eyes to see, and see not; they have ears to hear, and hear not: for they are a rebellious house.
fellowcitizen of the commonwealth of Yisra'el, NOT the STATE OF ISRAEL. |
| Oneisraelite |
Posted - 13 Feb 2004 : 05:41:48
Greetings once more in the name of the King, brothers and sisters:
And again, peace be upon the house.
To further understand this we must first know what a "kingdom" is. It is made up of two words [one shortened], king and dominion and means the "king's dominion" or "jurisdiction". Jurisdiction is NOT a place, it is a condition. This is why the Anointed One, the Wonderful Counsellor told us that it would not come by waiting for it, it is not out in the desert someplace, etc. You "choose" voluntarily your "king-dom", your "juris-diction" [oath taken] by whomever or whatever you swear allegiance to. This is why kosmokrator [G#2888] had us saying a "Pledge of Allegiance" to him every morning as children...to get us used to the idea that he was the head and we were the tail at an early age. This is also why the Fourth Commmandment of Yahweh begins, "Remember" and is to be remembered on the "seventh" day [not Satyr-Day; satyr does not mean seven]. Shabbat comes from the word shabat and means "a sevening", which is an oth in the Hebrew, which is oath in the English or better known as HIS Pledge of Allegiance!! But we digress.
kosmokrator
kos-mok-rat'-ore
From G2889 and G2902; a world ruler, an epithet of Satan
Satan is a man or more precisely a man-made thing, it is Yahweh's adversary, worldly governments, governments of the creature which are against Yahweh and His anointed.
Psalm 2:2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against Yahweh, and against his anointed...
Hence, Yahu'aqob [Yahweh's heel-catcher], whom you may know as James, made this statement: Yahu'aqob [James] 4:4 Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with Yahweh? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of Yahweh.
"Friendship" and "friend" mean to be "in association with", i.e. "in confederacy with". If we are "in confederacy" with the "kosmokrators" then WE are the "adversary" of Yahweh; and we know many are not going to want to hear this...and may react just as the Pharisees did when Stephen was trying to tell them this truth; they put their hands over their ears and screamed so as not to hear, falsely believing that if they did not hear, they would not be held accountable.
We believe that there are many in this forum that are ready to hear, ready for strong meat but if there are some to whom this still seems as "foolishness", do not dispair, for Yahweh calls us into His "vineyard" at all hours of the day and those called last shall be paid first, :), and, if we who were called in the morning or the afternoon complain, we shall be chastised by the Father [Founder] of the Nation for it is His prerogative, His Will be done, NOT ours. Let those who have ears to hear, let them hear.
fellowcitizen of the commonwealth of Yisra'el, NOT the STATE OF ISRAEL. |
| Oneisraelite |
Posted - 13 Feb 2004 : 05:03:55
Greetings and salutations in the name of the King, brothers and sisters:
Peace be on the house.
Robert-James gave sound advice: "Corporation soles are man made, and have no soul, nor breath of life." Give 'em the litmus test; do they spring from the Tree of Life? If not, ignore them.
Here is Shaul's [Paul's] advice: "Romans 7:4 Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law [regulations created by man] by the body of Anointed [this is Yahweh's "body politic"]; that ye should be married [married means, "incorportated into one body"] to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto Yahweh." Thus, once this has been done, we go back again to what Robert-James said: The Head of [the] woman is [the] man, the Head of man is Anointed One, the Head of the Anointed One is the Father YaHuWeH. Order.
Anything else is "disorder" or "upside down", which of course is why Shaul and certain brethren were accused of "turning the world upside down"...look up the three Strong's numbers attached to these words...we perceive that it should have been literally tranlated: "removing the Holy Roman Empire" as it did not belong to the "order" or "world" of Yahweh, which explains why they were accused of "doing contrary to the decrees of [the] caesar. By the way the only decree of [the] caesar we see in the Scripture is this: Luke 2:1 "And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be taxed." That ought to have given us a "clue"!! It of course was a false charge because the caesar/commander-in-chief was not their Head...the Anointed One was: "...these all do contrary to the decrees of Caesar, saying that there is another king, Yahu'shua! [G#2424&H#3091] This name given Him by the Father means, "Halloo, i.e. call on the name of Yahweh" [H#3091 is made up of H#3068&H#7769], which of course is why they were admonished by the council to go and teach in this name no more, since everyone else was saying "Halloo or Hail Caesar" or "we have no king but [the] caesar/commander-in-chief"...just as the "chief priests and elders" teach today via Romans thirteen.
The brethren weren't, in truth, doing contrary to [the] caesar anymore than you could do contrary to Sadaam Hussein's decrees...he is NOT your head, thus his decrees are not meant for you. Let him who has eyes to see, let him see.
fellowcitizen of the commonwealth of Yisra'el, NOT the STATE OF ISRAEL. |
| curiousinchrist |
Posted - 13 Feb 2004 : 03:44:05
friends,
although your replies are appreciate i must admit to not being over familiarized with the bible and it's wordings....some of you are obviousy au fait with such.
personally i find 'reading between the lines" somewhat daunting in this scenario..
in basic english...is linda kruger fit to be an overseer of a christian group or has she proved herself to be nothing more than a fraud and disciple of the devil? |
| Manuel |
Posted - 12 Feb 2004 : 22:17:28
Greetings In His name Yahushuah,
Ignorance of His Law is no excuse, therefore bare His yoke of Truth, and carry the weight which others not even lift a finger. After all, it is/was our lack thereof which either leads us out of mans "trick" rules, codes, and "public policies," or continues the transgressions with the deceivers. A lesson learned is a lesson well understood.
In Him, If He Wills,
I am,
Manuel |
|
|
